The hottest male nooler

AgentWood wrote:

Patrick wrote:

depthcharge wrote: Hear that Patrick?

They want us to post our pictures.

:\pimp3:

I think not, DC.

you could post a picture of your third cousin five times removed and we wouldn't know the difference. just call him patrick.

But that would be dishonest, AW.....

In any event, I have no such relatives, or if I do, I don't have their pictures.

Patrick wrote:

AgentWood wrote:

Patrick wrote:

depthcharge wrote: Hear that Patrick?

They want us to post our pictures.

:\pimp3:

I think not, DC.

you could post a picture of your third cousin five times removed and we wouldn't know the difference. just call him patrick.

But that would be dishonest, AW.....

In any event, I have no such relatives, or if I do, I don't have their pictures.

you are an intriguing individual, p.

AgentWood wrote:

Patrick wrote:

AgentWood wrote:

Patrick wrote:

depthcharge wrote: Hear that Patrick?

They want us to post our pictures.

:\pimp3:

I think not, DC.

you could post a picture of your third cousin five times removed and we wouldn't know the difference. just call him patrick.

But that would be dishonest, AW.....

In any event, I have no such relatives, or if I do, I don't have their pictures.

you are an intriguing individual, p.

An unexpected response, AW.

Perhaps Maya might be able to give you some insights.

leeharveyoswaldR.I.P1963 wrote: let's just end this now, i will prevail. Yes, im getting cocky.

Imagine if they had called it "Hottest Male Member" then.

Patrick wrote:

AgentWood wrote:

Patrick wrote:

AgentWood wrote:

Patrick wrote:

depthcharge wrote: Hear that Patrick?

They want us to post our pictures.

:\pimp3:

I think not, DC.

you could post a picture of your third cousin five times removed and we wouldn't know the difference. just call him patrick.

But that would be dishonest, AW.....

In any event, I have no such relatives, or if I do, I don't have their pictures.

you are an intriguing individual, p.

An unexpected response, AW.

Perhaps Maya might be able to give you some insights.

Ahem!

BIGINOIL wrote:

Patrick wrote:

AgentWood wrote:

Patrick wrote:

AgentWood wrote:

Patrick wrote:

depthcharge wrote: Hear that Patrick?

They want us to post our pictures.

:\pimp3:

I think not, DC.

you could post a picture of your third cousin five times removed and we wouldn't know the difference. just call him patrick.

But that would be dishonest, AW.....

In any event, I have no such relatives, or if I do, I don't have their pictures.

you are an intriguing individual, p.

An unexpected response, AW.

Perhaps Maya might be able to give you some insights.

Ahem!

Yes?

Patrick wrote: An unexpected response, AW.

Perhaps Maya might be able to give you some insights.

i have a smidgen of insight, p.

still find you intriguing. why unexpected?

Patrick wrote:

depthcharge wrote: Hear that Patrick?

They want us to post our pictures.

:\pimp3:

I think not, DC.

I have images of Pats, Huntsman and myself and I'm prepared to post them for a short period of time.

Actually I won't post Huntsman because he's not around to defend himself. Plus he's standing next to a dude in a Wookie-suit in the shot, so it doesn't do much for his height.

:\pimp3:

Patrick wrote:

Spotnick wrote:

AgentWood wrote: whatever happened to muffy, anyway?

Last time he was here, was was "The Real Huntsman" and other several nicknames.

He's lurking...

Gee, I thought that was DC.......

So much for that particular conspiracy, P.

Tsk, tsk.

:\pimp3:

depthcharge wrote:

Actually I won't post Huntsman because he's not around to defend himself. Plus he's standing next to a dude in a Wookie-suit in the shot, so it doesn't do much for his height.

:\pimp3:

doesn't seem like a problem. we can simply deduce that he's less than 7 feet tall.

AgentWood wrote:

depthcharge wrote:

Actually I won't post Huntsman because he's not around to defend himself. Plus he's standing next to a dude in a Wookie-suit in the shot, so it doesn't do much for his height.

:\pimp3:

doesn't seem like a problem. we can simply deduce that he's less than 7 feet tall.

The problem is more determining who is the Wookie.

I'll see what I can muster up later.

:\pimp3:

depthcharge wrote:

AgentWood wrote:

depthcharge wrote:

Actually I won't post Huntsman because he's not around to defend himself. Plus he's standing next to a dude in a Wookie-suit in the shot, so it doesn't do much for his height.

:\pimp3:

doesn't seem like a problem. we can simply deduce that he's less than 7 feet tall.

The problem is more determining who is the Wookie.

:\pimp3:

does huntsman have copious amounts of body hair?

The Man Up North wrote:

AgentWood wrote: whatever happened to muffy, anyway?

Whatever happened to me anyway ???

i told you...we need some photographic evidence, seb!

The Man Up North wrote:

AgentWood wrote: whatever happened to muffy, anyway?

Whatever happened to me anyway ???

i told you...we need some photographic evidence, seb!

AgentWood wrote:

does huntsman have copious amounts of body hair?

Sorry Agent Wood, I can't claim to know him that intimately.

:\pimp3:

depthcharge wrote:

AgentWood wrote:

does huntsman have copious amounts of body hair?

Sorry Agent Wood, I can't claim to know him that intimately.

:\pimp3:

as wookiees wear no clothing, surely you could tell which was man and which was wookiee?

Why Hello Its me

Plus my bands Cover for our album.

AgentWood wrote:

depthcharge wrote:

AgentWood wrote:

does huntsman have copious amounts of body hair?

Sorry Agent Wood, I can't claim to know him that intimately.

:\pimp3:

as wookiees wear no clothing, surely you could tell which was man and which was wookiee?

It's a nice theory but they both had their bandoliers fitted quite low that particular day.

Gags aside, Huntsman is a fairly regular lookin' Joe. He doesn't actually run around in long curly boots with a potted plant on his head or anything like that, as some here may have envisaged.

:\pimp3:

Now Pats on the other hand...

:\pimp3:

AgentWood wrote:

Patrick wrote: An unexpected response, AW.

Perhaps Maya might be able to give you some insights.

i have a smidgen of insight, p.

still find you intriguing. why unexpected?

I wouldn't have thought my comments would seem intriguing, AW. I try to blend into the wallpaper.

depthcharge wrote:

AgentWood wrote:

depthcharge wrote:

AgentWood wrote:

does huntsman have copious amounts of body hair?

Sorry Agent Wood, I can't claim to know him that intimately.

:\pimp3:

as wookiees wear no clothing, surely you could tell which was man and which was wookiee?

It's a nice theory but they both had their bandoliers fitted quite low that particular day.

Gags aside, Huntsman is a fairly regular lookin' Joe. He doesn't actually run around in long curly boots with a potted plant on his head or anything like that, as some here may have envisaged.

:\pimp3:

Are you quite sure that photo is really H, DC?

Not really, no.

:\pimp3:

depthcharge wrote: Not really, no.

:\pimp3:

I expected more of a fight. Long week?

I liked your comment about blending into the wallpaper though, Pats.

Seen Garden State yet? Perhaps your aunt buys your shirts too.

:\pimp3:

depthcharge wrote: I liked your comment about blending into the wallpaper though, Pats.

Seen Garden State yet? Perhaps your aunt buys your shirts too.

:\pimp3:

Haven't seen that one yet, DC. Looks like it could be a good source of wardrobe ideas.

Do you mind if I post our photos later, P?

For the ladies?

Apparently AgentWood is offering a free massage to the winner.

... Albeit an ego massage.

:\pimp3: