The more I listen to track 1, the better it sounds.
The more I listen, the more I am inclined to agree that 9 is better than 8.
The more I listen, the more I am inclined to believe Turn is the best thing they have ever done.
98 replies · 1,832 views
The more I listen to track 1, the better it sounds.
The more I listen, the more I am inclined to agree that 9 is better than 8.
The more I listen, the more I am inclined to believe Turn is the best thing they have ever done.
It is almost a surreal experience to be playing the above tracks in 2005 as new.
I find the album to be the missing link between PC&L / LL and T. And I'm so glad it was eventually found.
There are more shiver inducing moments than a grown man should ever be confronted with.
For NO, it was just another day in the week ... which I believe to be the key to the song structures and more importantly, Bernard's recaptured laconic singing style.
No doubt about the shivers.
One reaction I have to 9 is that it sounds like NO saying to PSB, if that's the sort of thing you want to do, here is how to do it.
You're so right about BS's singing on this album, H, to me of course most notably on 10.
Bit disappointing someone slapped a one star on this thread Pastie?
I was distracted from work for 10 mins trying to distinguish the concessions from the claim.
:\pimp3:
depthcharge wrote:
Bit disappointing someone slapped a one star on this thread Pastie?
I was distracted from work for 10 mins trying to distinguish the concessions from the claim.
:\pimp3:
I have no idea where the stars come from, DC. Do you?
The concessions come first, then the claim.
Wouldn't do that to you, P.
Seems there are critics wielding daggers out there though.
:\pimp3:
depthcharge wrote:
Wouldn't do that to you, P.
Seems there are critics wielding daggers out there though.
:\pimp3:
I didn't think you did, DC. I was just asking if you knew the explanation for this new phenomenon.
Perhaps it's one of our old "friends."
huntsman wrote: The Lone Star State. Is that a re-mix?
Perhaps a remix of Texas.
Pastie, if you check the top of the thread you'll see a star icon where punters can rate the entertainment value of the thread, or so I understand.
My bet is Hucklebutt threw you a shiny yellow one to assist your ratings.
:\pimp3:
depthcharge wrote:
huntsman wrote: The Lone Star State. Is that a re-mix?
Perhaps a remix of Texas.
Pastie, if you check the top of the thread you'll see a star icon where punters can rate the entertainment value of the thread, or so I understand.
My bet is Hucklebutt threw you a shiny yellow one to assist your ratings.
:\pimp3:
Thanks for the elucidation, DC. It appears we have a new toy or game if we choose to play it.
NObabe wrote: I have just rated it.
Thank you very much for that kind and generous gesture, my lady. I hope to be able to return the favor some day.
Were you thinking about visiting Eastern Europe P?
You could take your lady out to Dracula's Castle for some soup.
huntsman wrote: Were you thinking about visiting Eastern Europe P? You could take your lady out to Dracula's Castle for some soup.
My passport expired years ago, H.
huntsman wrote: Rubbish.
Are you telling me it didn't, H? Or that I should travel without one?
Although the States is about the size of Saturn, it would be nice to think that you could make it to Sweden for a coffee, just to experience a different air.
But who am I to say such a thing. I don't even know how to fit a cambelt.
huntsman wrote: Although the States is about the size of Saturn, it would be nice to think that you could make it to Sweden for a coffee, just to experience a different air. But who am I to say such a thing. I don't even know how to fit a cambelt.
Actually, H, if I were going to travel, I think I'd like to see Australia.
Jealous are we Huckler?
He appears to be snubbing your tea and milk arrowroot overtures and coming straight for the emu fritters.
:\pimp3:
He can go where he likes, see if I care.
(Note: cancel hot crossed buns and Ringtons tea bags)
Dear me, I didn't anticipate this would take on a personal tone. I thought we were talking about a geography lesson.
You know what he's like, P.
He's had a bag of tofu steaks in the deep freeze for four years now in anticipation.
:\pimp3:
Pastry, given your curser offload recently within Sprinklers Regrettable thread, are you still in suitably bullish mood to administer the full, unexpurgated WFTSC 'concept'?
patrick wrote: Tofu steaks or emu fritters? I've never had either before. Decisions, decisions.
If you value things like a druid-free environment, locals with reasonable dental care and a general lack of rollymops, I'd recommend flying straight over Marske and visiting the big Aus.
:\pimp3:
huntsman wrote: Pastry, given your curser offload recently within Sprinklers Regrettable thread, are you still in suitably bullish mood to administer the full, unexpurgated WFTSC 'concept'?
I don't know that I have fully developed it yet, H, but I thought I had already given the general outline. In light of the album's title and numerous other indications, the album as a whole is a variation on the Odyssey/Ulysses theme, an attempt to portray a life, a world, a journey, a day by focusing on an everyman/hero, presumably "Joe" of track 1, starting with the bells for his funeral, then using flashbacks to show what came before, and finally arriving, in track 10, at the death marked by the funeral bells at the beginning. Circular in the way that Finnegans Wake is, with the first words completing the sentence that is incomplete at the end of the work. That's the general concept.
depthcharge wrote:
patrick wrote: Tofu steaks or emu fritters? I've never had either before. Decisions, decisions.
If you value things like a druid-free environment, locals with reasonable dental care and a general lack of rollymops, I'd recommend flying straight over Marske and visiting the big Aus.
:\pimp3:
I don't believe I know the term "rollymops." But the place looked quite appealing on Road Rules.
patrick wrote:
huntsman wrote: Pastry, given your curser offload recently within Sprinklers Regrettable thread, are you still in suitably bullish mood to administer the full, unexpurgated WFTSC 'concept'?
I don't know that I have fully developed it yet, H, but I thought I had already given the general outline. In light of the album's title and numerous other indications, the album as a whole is a variation on the Odyssey/Ulysses theme, an attempt to portray a life, a world, a journey, a day by focusing on an everyman/hero, presumably "Joe" of track 1, starting with the bells for his funeral, then using flashbacks to show what came before, and finally arriving, in track 10, at the death marked by the funeral bells at the beginning. Circular in the way that Finnegans Wake is, with the first words completing the sentence that is incomplete at the end of the work. That's the general concept.
I still haven't got to the truth of your vocational mystery yet Pastie, but I can now eliminate a few smokies.
US president, for instance.
:\pimp3:
patrick wrote:
The more I listen to track 1, the better it sounds.
The more I listen, the more I am inclined to agree that 9 is better than 8.
The more I listen, the more I am inclined to believe Turn is the best thing they have ever done.
I still think Track #1 would be better with a better vocal melody, the chorus is very VERY good, but the rest is a bit flat.
Track 9 IS better than 8, that's a fact.
I feel the same way you do for track 10, but with track 3...
patrick wrote:
I don't believe I know the term "rollymops." But the place looked quite appealing on Road Rules.
Think the word might actually be "rollmops" but I'll need to clear it with Hucklebutt. Does that make any more sense?
:\pimp3:
Driving from the centre of town to the suburbs takes around 23 seconds (27 if you decide to go twice 'round the roundabout).
Now all I say to DC is ... beat that!
Spotnick wrote:
patrick wrote:
The more I listen to track 1, the better it sounds.
The more I listen, the more I am inclined to agree that 9 is better than 8.
The more I listen, the more I am inclined to believe Turn is the best thing they have ever done.
I still think Track #1 would be better with a better vocal melody, the chorus is very VERY good, but the rest is a bit flat.
Track 9 IS better than 8, that's a fact.
I feel the same way you do for track 10, but with track 3...
My failure to mention track 3 wasn't meant to suggest that I thought either 1 or 9 was better than 3. Track 3 is brilliant. It's just that track 10 is transcendent.
As you know quite well H, we have the Australian badger. One in every hotel room, complimentary.
:\pimp3:
depthcharge wrote:
patrick wrote:
I don't believe I know the term "rollymops." But the place looked quite appealing on Road Rules.
Think the word might actually be "rollmops" but I'll need to clear it with Hucklebutt. Does that make any more sense?
:\pimp3:
If we're talking about a floor-cleaning implement, I think I understand now.
The 'concept' seems almost complete there now Patty. Good work. Man sets out on raft, man drifts onto island with monsters on it, man beats cyclops, cyclops retires through leg injury, cyclops opens corner store, man decides to go back to work after snagging his foot on a starfish.
It's as if I'm there.
patrick wrote:
If we're talking about a floor-cleaning implement, I think I understand now.
I'd imagine the taste is just about that.
:\pimp3:
huntsman wrote: The 'concept' seems almost complete there now Patty. Good work. Man sets out on raft, man drifts onto island with monsters on it, man beats cyclops, cyclops retires through leg injury, cyclops opens corner store, man decides to go back to work after snagging his foot on a starfish. It's as if I'm there.
Nearly there, H. Don't forget the funeral. It's the best part.
I don't have anything to compete with the complementary badgers. In fact, that's not a bad deal.
I don't like to dwindle on the negative P.
Funnily enough, I spied his vapor trail on the Underworld boards recently, debating the merits of the new Tomato Designs' adidas Superstar.
:\pimp3:
depthcharge wrote:
Bit disappointing someone slapped a one star on this thread Pastie?
I was distracted from work for 10 mins trying to distinguish the concessions from the claim.
:\pimp3:
I just discovered that by clicking on the stars you can see who's done the ratings.
huntsman wrote: Your skill with the computer P; is it a gift? Nice to know I was vindicated.
I don't believe anyone accused you of being the one-star bandit, did they, H?
By the way, another point on the Odyssey/Ulysses concept: "It's been ten long years since I've been home."
If you check back P, there was some accusations pointed.
But P, did you check through the threads and spot the kindly gent. who bestowed you a very fine complement. He couldn't resist temptation, played the tracks and was 'speechless' at track 10; to the point of jerking a tear.
That's a tear jerk, and not a beef jerky.
huntsman wrote: If you check back P, there was some accusations pointed. But P, did you check through the threads and spot the kindly gent. who bestowed you a very fine complement. He couldn't resist temptation, played the tracks and was 'speechless' at track 10; to the point of jerking a tear. That's a tear jerk, and not a beef jerky.
So far, H, I have not engaged in the exercise of trying to determine who said what, when, and who did what, when. Perhaps I will at some point.
But in any event, H, any accusations that may have been made, surely they were not made by me against you?
huntsman wrote: I think it was mid-Oz vs. Britain. Either way, everyone's a winner. Until later ...
After thinking about this, I recall saying something like "Maybe it's one of our old 'friends.'" You didn't think I was referring to you, H? I did in fact have a specific person in mind, but it certainly wasn't you, H. I would think you might be able to guess who I was thinking of. In any event, I'm sorry to have created doubts by my failure to give more of a hint. It probably would have been better not to make the comment at all.
NObabe wrote: Who has done the ratings then?
One of the people whose name appears when you click on the stars seems to have deleted his rating, perhaps after realizing it wasn't anonymous.
NObabe wrote: How do I delete my ratings?
It's not that I want to, I'm just curious.
Since I haven't done any, I'm not sure. But do you not see what I mean in the box you get when you click on the stars?
NObabe wrote: Sure I can see. It was Andy who has deleted his rating, right?
That's the way it looks, unless there's some other explanation.
NObabe wrote: Or he was trying to say that it was terrible :D
Yes, even worse than zero stars!! Negative stars!!
Chaps, I was referring to this (pg.1 / 2) when I mentioned that Pastie's 'named poster' discovery had vindicated myself and other animals ...
DC wrote: My bet is Hucklebutt threw you a shiny yellow one to assist your ratings.
... P, you seemed to have added an additional X-file type element to your initial concessions and single claim.
I'd click for another star but I'd surely be starting yet another conspiracy.
There is nothing more to see here, so let's be having you on your ways. Come along.
huntsman wrote: Chaps, I was referring to this (pg.1 / 2) when I mentioned that Pastie's 'named poster' discovery had vindicated myself and other animals ... DC wrote: My bet is Hucklebutt threw you a shiny yellow one to assist your ratings. ... P, you seemed to have added an additional X-file type element to your initial concessions and single claim. I'd click for another star but I'd surely be starting yet another conspiracy. There is nothing more to see here, so let's be having you on your ways. Come along.
Yes, H, the mystery of the missing stars that didn't bark in the night while Ana was sneaking out the bathroom window.
By the way, H, is your last line a contribution to my concept for WFTSC?
It wasn't, P - I was simply urging the door shut on the star shooter and retracting machine.
I think your WFTSC concept is now a complete entity, even if all of the words where never spoken of in entirity (like all the best legends). It is a delightful theory, and warms the cockels (so to speak).
Isn't it amazing that the power of NO is enough to 'turn' a man to such discussions.
Alas, I am only fleetingly checking the liner for goodies ... I will resume, God willing, next week.
Over and out.
huntsman wrote: It wasn't, P - I was simply urging the door shut on the star shooter and retracting machine. I think your WFTSC concept is now a complete entity, even if all of the words where never spoken of in entirity (like all the best legends). It is a delightful theory, and warms the cockels (so to speak). Isn't it amazing that the power of NO is enough to 'turn' a man to such discussions. Alas, I am only fleetingly checking the liner for goodies ... I will resume, God willing, next week. Over and out.
See you then, H. Take care, and happy listening.
NObabe wrote: Or he was trying to say that it was terrible :D
It turns out that you're right. That's what it looks like when you give something zero stars.
NObabe wrote:
I doubt that I can rate it more than once but I will try.
In any event we can watch out for opportunities to rate his threads.
patrick wrote:
NObabe wrote:
I doubt that I can rate it more than once but I will try.
In any event we can watch out for opportunities to rate his threads.
As I suspected, it didn't work. Oh well. I tried.
NObabe wrote: Revenge is a dish best served cold. He he!
I am sure an opportunity will present itself at some point. Patience and vigilance!
NObabe wrote:
![]()
Ace! Btw, what was this thread all about?
I think it was about me taking a trip to Australia.
NObabe wrote: Renew your passport first!
Thanks for the reminder!
I see that RM has given this thread zero stars. His highest approval rating, I guess.
patrick wrote:
I see that RM has given this thread zero stars. His highest approval rating, I guess.
RM?
Pastie I tend to think you should just be honoured that Ralph Macchio took the time to read your thread, with his busy schedule and all.
:\pimp3:
depthcharge wrote:
patrick wrote:
I see that RM has given this thread zero stars. His highest approval rating, I guess.
RM?
Pastie I tend to think you should just be honoured that Ralph Macchio took the time to read your thread, with his busy schedule and all.
:\pimp3:
RM=Rocket Mick.
Should I know who Ralph Macchio is, DC?
By the way, where have you been? Away somewhere?
Alas P, timezones are quite the hindrance to be part of the malarkey round here.
I tend to miss the bulk of the japing it seems. For instance, it's currently 2.16am local time.
As for Ralph Macchio, Hucklebutt would be rather bemused at your lack of recognition if he wasn't off freezing cheese as we speak. Were you not subject to the Karate Kid films in the eighties?
:\pimp3:
depthcharge wrote:
Alas P, timezones are quite the hindrance to be part of the malarkey round here.
I tend to miss the bulk of the japing it seems. For instance, it's currently 2.16am local time.
As for Ralph Macchio, Hucklebutt would be rather bemused at your lack of recognition if he wasn't off freezing cheese as we speak. Were you not subject to the Karate Kid films in the eighties?
:\pimp3:
Yes, DC, I'd actually been wondering about the time zone question but hadn't thought to ask.
I do recall that there were such movies but I don't believe I had the pleasure of actually viewing them. I thought perhaps you were referring to some current person in area of endeavor that I don't pay attention to, such as something involving balls and stadiums.
To be honest, I'm not sure about the actual degree of pleasure that was gleaned from the KK series but I think Huckler will back me when I suggest that David Suzuki may have played the role of karate mentor. He's apparently talented enough to deliver UN keynotes and catch flies with chopsticks
Experienced the treat of picking up the legitimate Aussie copies of the single and album today, by the way.
:\pimp3:
depthcharge wrote:
To be honest, I'm not sure about the actual degree of pleasure that was gleaned from the KK series but I think Huckler will back me when I suggest that David Suzuki may have played the role of karate mentor. He's apparently talented enough to deliver UN keynotes and catch flies with chopsticks
Experienced the treat of picking up the legitimate Aussie copies of the single and album today, by the way.
:\pimp3:
Any revelations in the packaging, photos, etc.?
Not sure about revelations, but certainly the unit makes a lot more sense from a design concept perspective. It's quite pleasing.
An element that our erstwhile Marsked Man will be thrilled about beyond containment is the unexpected inclusion of a rabbit smack bang in the middle of proceedings.
It'll be worth checking back here in a few days just to partake in the verbiage.
:\pimp3:
depthcharge wrote:
Not sure about revelations, but certainly the unit makes a lot more sense from a design concept perspective. It's quite pleasing.
An element that our erstwhile Marsked Man will be thrilled about beyond containment is the unexpected inclusion of a rabbit smack bang in the middle of proceedings.
It'll be worth checking back here in a few days just to partake in the verbiage.
:\pimp3:
I'm certainly hoping that mine will be delivered tomorrow.
By the way, DC, when do you sleep?
Thanks for the reminder, I should call it a night in a minute, before I get grilled from the other room.
Are you a regular Pitchfork reader Pastie? Certainly strikes me as one of the better music sites. What do you expect they'll have to say about WFTSC?
:\pimp3:
depthcharge wrote:
Thanks for the reminder, I should call it a night in a minute, before I get grilled from the other room.
Are you a regular Pitchfork reader Pastie? Certainly strikes me as one of the better music sites. What do you expect they'll have to say about WFTSC?
:\pimp3:
I wouldn't say I'm a regular at Pitchfork, DC. I look at it occasionally. I don't know that I look at it frequently enough to have a prediction. But since it's a U.S. site (isn't it?) I assume they will wait for the North American release.
Reason I ask is that it seems quite an elitist music site.
It is a US site although I wouldn't be surprised to see a review earlier than official US release date, given they reviewed Krafty quite a while back now. Have a bad feeling it might come in for a pummelling from them.
I'm skimming through the album now, searching for any sign of a hidden track, or an 'Easter egg' in DVD speak. There was reference to something of the sort a while ago, from the likes of Muffy I believe. Nothing as yet, perhaps we've been rumbled again.
:\pimp3:
depthcharge wrote:
Reason I ask is that it seems quite an elitist music site.
It is a US site although I wouldn't be surprised to see a review earlier than official US release date, given they reviewed Krafty quite a while back now. Have a bad feeling it might come in for a pummelling from them.
I'm skimming through the album now, searching for any sign of a hidden track, or an 'Easter egg' in DVD speak. There was reference to something of the sort a while ago, from the likes of Muffy I believe. Nothing as yet, perhaps we've been rumbled again.
:\pimp3:
Based on my limited experience with them I think you're probably right on the elitist point, DC.
But who knows. I just hope they actually listen to the album more than once before reviewing it.
On the hidden extra front, perhaps someone had a change of heart.
The sirens are truly calling here now, time to call it a night.
I'll be watching this space with interest over the next few days as yourself and others acquire the genuine article.
Excelsior!
:\pimp3:
depthcharge wrote:
The sirens are truly calling here now, time to call it a night.
I'll be watching this space with interest over the next few days as yourself and others acquire the genuine article.
Excelsior!
:\pimp3:
Sweet dreams, DC. I was just about to say that it must be time for you to go to bed.