Skip to content

BBC Glastonbury live CD

Archived

40 replies · 3,245 views

This is an archived legacy thread. Replies are closed, but the discussion is preserved.

One item that has always been oddly missing from my collection of NO songs is the BBC Glastonbury album.

Had a look on Amazon and saw the original (I think) album: http://www.amazon.co.uk/New-Order-BBC-Live-Concert/dp/B0000245DP/ref=pd_rhf_shvl_1

But also saw what looked like a 2002 re-release: http://www.amazon.co.uk/BBC-Radio-1-Live-Concert/dp/B00004TA68

Does anyone know if there are any major differences apart from the artwork (diff. track listings, diff. sound quality etc)?

EDIT: Also, does anyone know if this is available digitally (legally) anywhere?

0 likes

Same tracklisting. Just a different cover; upgrading from the curiously naff nineties one to a more uniform one (its a similar concept to the In Session CD etc).

It is easily available digitally for free in certain areas, now.

Dont ban me, Ive still got my shitty 1992 copy!

0 likes

Of all the concerts they could have released...

Even when I first heard it I thought it was a bit weak and since the Internet came along I don't think I heard one that's as naff :-(

Listened to it loads though, filling in time until something better came along...and then Republic turns up.

0 likes

Nowt wrong with the gig, just the recording that isn't up to scratch.

0 likes

I can honestly say that I have only listened to this unessential live album in its entirety about two or three times and no more when I originally bought it in 1992.

It's one of the worst live albums all told. Bernard absolutely [vocally] murders a couple of songs - especially BLT, does a pointless version of Every Little Counts (which for some unknown reason is actually shoddily mis-titled on the album, did no one not notice, or were they too arsed to care?). And then the pointless cover to end all pointless covers - Sister Flamin' Ray.

The only noteworthy thing is the quip "Notice all our songs have big endings? Big endings...small dicks..." from Bernard himself.....as BLT finishes....

So it was reissued on CD with a new cover.... so what?

No thanks!

:nonono: :nonono: :nonono: :angry:

0 likes

:shrug:.. well I enjoyed myself, mud n'all


0 likes

I don't think the Glastonbury 87 or Peel Session BBC CD reissues from 2000 with the new artwork were remastered. Literally just the same audio content but different packaging.

It's an interesting gig if only for the inclusion of the supposed (?) début performance of True Faith and Barney clearly sounds very very pissed throughout all the songs. Can't say I've ever had it on heavy rotation; the version of Sister Ray is so shambolic it's endearing though.

As most fans know The Peel Sessions are ace. Hearing new life is breathed into the Movement songs and stuff like 5-8-6 showing where they would be going. Brilliant release, would love it on vinyl actually... must check out Ebay.

0 likes

wasn't there also a liberal fricassée of mushrooms going on?

0 likes

I'm pretty sure I've got a 'complete' copy of this gig somewhere, with Elegia from Retro tacked on along with the other missing tracks sourced from FM.

Not that it enhances anything in any way, of course. This has always been my least favourite New Order release by a country mile.

0 likes

Barney's vocals are terrible on this CD

0 likes

Its a terrible album.The singing is horrid and theres so many bum notes by Barney, Hooks and Gillian its laughable.

The best song is TBTHOG. Temptation is ruined by a badly out of tune guitar. TPK,BLT,AOC have terrible guitar effects. Sister Ray is just crap. Cant remember the other songs.

A real shame as its a quality recording (as in clarity). Strange choice of original cover, as photo was from a concert in 1989 in Ibiza Cafe something (I believe). 2 years after bloody Glastonbury performance.

0 likes

Shortly after the gig I got two bootlegs, one audio and one video. I also got hold of the Radio 1 broadcast. Of the three the radio broadcast was for me the worst. The quality of recording was great but the levels were all wrong, Hookys mike was barely there yet audience recordings show it well up there. Can't say I've heard this tape in well over 20 years and I think the Glastonbury CD is simply a tidy version of the FM broadcast, seem to remember some discussion at the time of it's release and the answer was that it wasn't a multitrack recording that could be remixed later, it was mixed and broadcast live, badly.

So for me Barneys singing was about normal for that period of time, the Glastonbury recording was badly recorded and simply raised it's prominence. If you want a good radio broadcast try the 10th Summer recording.

0 likes

It isn't a great gig, but not as bad as everyone is saying IMO.

Ceremony and Sunrise, weren't fantastic versions, which is probably why they were left off the CD that Windsong released. The original BBC transcription LP that came out in 1987, has the full show. This is quite rare and expensive.

0 likes

I've heard the gig was fine, but a lot of the fun was lost thanx to (a) the transition to tape, (b) the editor's scissors - not only of songs but of inter-song banter too - and (c) the rather prissy production. To be honest, when the album first came out it was at the height of my enthusiasm and the nadir of their creativity so I was just chuffed to shove another slab of vinyl into me collection! Plus to my knowledge it was the first official recording of a standard live take on Temptation. Not an essential release, but not an embarrassment either.

0 likes

I like it for True Faith with its chaotic ending,also has some samples from Star Trek on TPK if I remember rightly,courtesy of Mr Morris I would imagine.I would like to hear the full gig,odd that they included Sister Ray and left out Elegia & Sunrise.

0 likes

This concert really is pretty bad; totally agree with the other comments that their shambolic carelessness isn't captured in a flattering way by the mixing.

If I remember right even the liner notes say it treads the line between genius and a complete joke.

Sister Ray is amazing though! That track has always been one of my fave things by them, ever.

0 likes

Like Jimbo says, the gig was fine for those who were there. This has absolutely no bearing on how a recording of said gig will sound.

People round here regularly cream themselves over the Radio 1 broadcast of the Reading '93 gig (released in various forms, most notoriously as "Electronic Ecstasy"). I was at this one, and I can assure you I can make barely any connection between that recording and my memory of the event. You play Al Jarvis that very slick recording and he'll show you the scars on his wrists and the glass eye he has as a result of gouging his own peeper out with a cardboard beer cup.

0 likes

Clayhead Liberation Faction wrote: Like Jimbo says, the gig was fine for those who were there. This has absolutely no bearing on how a recording of said gig will sound.

People round here regularly cream themselves over the Radio 1 broadcast of the Reading '93 gig (released in various forms, most notoriously as "Electronic Ecstasy"). I was at this one, and I can assure you I can make barely any connection between that recording and my memory of the event. You play Al Jarvis that very slick recording and he'll show you the scars on his wrists and the glass eye he has as a result of gouging his own peeper out with a cardboard beer cup.

dON'T TRY THIS `with a KFC bucket!:nono: :lol:

0 likes

Clayhead Liberation Faction wrote: Like Jimbo says, the gig was fine for those who were there. This has absolutely no bearing on how a recording of said gig will sound.

People round here regularly cream themselves over the Radio 1 broadcast of the Reading '93 gig (released in various forms, most notoriously as "Electronic Ecstasy"). I was at this one, and I can assure you I can make barely any connection between that recording and my memory of the event. You play Al Jarvis that very slick recording and he'll show you the scars on his wrists and the glass eye he has as a result of gouging his own peeper out with a cardboard beer cup.

That is actually spot on... I remember the band absolutely fucking losing it in the middle. Everyone Everywhere sounded like a pile of cack, yet its great on that bootleg. Not a great gig either. "We're New Order, and we are not splitting up"... You might as well, for four or five years after that album and gig etc. I whispered. In retrospect.

0 likes

Reading 93 was recorded on multi track and mixed at a later date.There are the odd things that have been fixed, I think the most obvious is the bass on Regret, had a couple of bad mistakes in that.

"Live at the Reading Festival 1993" CD, has the complete show, where as 'Electronic Ecstasy' is missing 'Dream attack' and BLT.

0 likes

I think Hooky said at one point when mixing the Reading show,that he was sat in the studio with tears in his eyes thinking that "we'll never play those songs agaian".

0 likes

mark reed wrote: I think Hooky said at one point when mixing the Reading show,that he was sat in the studio with tears in his eyes thinking that "we'll never play those songs agaian".

Poof.

0 likes

Michael Monkhouse wrote:

mark reed wrote: I think Hooky said at one point when mixing the Reading show,that he was sat in the studio with tears in his eyes thinking that "we'll never play those songs agaian".

Poof.

And a bit of a fibber because Im pretty sure they did play those songs again.

0 likes

Gene wrote:

Michael Monkhouse wrote:

mark reed wrote: I think Hooky said at one point when mixing the Reading show,that he was sat in the studio with tears in his eyes thinking that "we'll never play those songs agaian".

Poof.

And a bit of a fibber because Im pretty sure they did play those songs again.

Lying fucking poofs. Why don't they just fuck off down Canal Street with their overpriced lager-beer and just fucking stay there.

Twats.

0 likes

NO Regret wrote: Its a terrible album.The singing is horrid and theres so many bum notes by Barney, Hooks and Gillian its laughable.

The best song is TBTHOG. Temptation is ruined by a badly out of tune guitar. TPK,BLT,AOC have terrible guitar effects. Sister Ray is just crap. Cant remember the other songs.

A real shame as its a quality recording (as in clarity). Strange choice of original cover, as photo was from a concert in 1989 in Ibiza Cafe something (I believe). 2 years after bloody Glastonbury performance.

You can never have seen Nu Ordah live I take it?

0 likes

Interesting comparison with Reading 93. My recollection of that tour was of New Order going through the motions, average performances and a bad atmosphere on stage, Reading was particularly awful for that and I came away not expecting to see them again.

And Mikes right regarding the bum notes/out of tune guitars, that was part of the fun!

0 likes

Clayhead Liberation Faction wrote:

Gene wrote:

Michael Monkhouse wrote:

mark reed wrote: I think Hooky said at one point when mixing the Reading show,that he was sat in the studio with tears in his eyes thinking that "we'll never play those songs agaian".

Poof.

And a bit of a fibber because Im pretty sure they did play those songs again.

Lying fucking poofs. Why don't they just fuck off down Canal Street with their overpriced lager-beer and just fucking stay there. Twats.

Also, Elegia isnt even that good. Everyone says that it is but it isnt.

0 likes

Gene wrote:

Clayhead Liberation Faction wrote:

Gene wrote:

Michael Monkhouse wrote:

mark reed wrote: I think Hooky said at one point when mixing the Reading show,that he was sat in the studio with tears in his eyes thinking that "we'll never play those songs agaian".

Poof.

And a bit of a fibber because Im pretty sure they did play those songs again.

Lying fucking poofs. Why don't they just fuck off down Canal Street with their overpriced lager-beer and just fucking stay there. Twats.

Also, Elegia isnt even that good. Everyone says that it is but it isnt.

Word, bro. Music for felchers and no mistake. They're all going to hell for this.

I am going to eat my £350 vinyl copy of the Glastonbury gig and shit it out in pure unadulterated disgust.

Take that, fibbing pop stars who can't sing or play their instruments and all their songs were fucking crap anyway. Yeah!

0 likes

Clayhead Liberation Faction wrote:

Gene wrote:

Clayhead Liberation Faction wrote:

Gene wrote:

Michael Monkhouse wrote:

mark reed wrote: I think Hooky said at one point when mixing the Reading show,that he was sat in the studio with tears in his eyes thinking that "we'll never play those songs agaian".

Poof.

And a bit of a fibber because Im pretty sure they did play those songs again.

Lying fucking poofs. Why don't they just fuck off down Canal Street with their overpriced lager-beer and just fucking stay there. Twats.

Also, Elegia isnt even that good. Everyone says that it is but it isnt.

Word, bro. Music for felchers and no mistake. They're all going to hell for this.

I am going to eat my £350 vinyl copy of the Glastonbury gig and shit it out in pure unadulterated disgust.

Take that, fibbing pop stars who can't sing or play their instruments and all their songs were fucking crap anyway. Yeah!

Yer big dafty :nod:

0 likes

I love the version of Sister Ray on the Glasto CD though, it's so punk and shambolic, and full of drunken madcap energy. I actually like this recording because it really sounds like a punk band playing electronic music. And Touched by The Hand of God sounds fucking great on this CD. Yeah, Bernard's voice is awful and they fuck up a lot of songs...thats part of the charm!

0 likes

Zachery Starkey wrote: I love the version of Sister Ray on the Glasto CD though, it's so punk and shambolic, and full of drunken madcap energy. I actually like this recording because it really sounds like a punk band playing electronic music. And Touched by The Hand of God sounds fucking great on this CD. Yeah, Bernard's voice is awful and they fuck up a lot of songs...thats part of the charm!

Part of the charm ?........... Oh no it isn't.

It's the aural equivalent of eating cardboard doused in vinegar and tomato ketchup whilst being harangued by a drunken old wino who keeps spitting into your ear. It's rancid.

:rolleyes: :thumbdown: :p

0 likes

Think New order's best live performances were in 93. The Perfect Tune :clap:

0 likes

By 'Eck! My Neck! wrote:

It's the aural equivalent of eating cardboard doused in vinegar and tomato ketchup whilst being harangued by a drunken old wino who keeps spitting into your ear. It's rancid.

:rolleyes: :thumbdown: :p

Kath has never spat in my ear. :nono:

0 likes

Big Mouth Julio wrote: Think New order's best live performances were in 93. The Perfect Tune :clap:

I see what you did there.

You little roister doister.:laugh:

0 likes

Big Mouth Julio wrote: Think New order's best live performances were in 93. The Perfect Tune :clap:

I agree - Bernard's voice reached its peak here, which is why some New Order purists don't like the period so much - they WANT his crap singing, or it's not New Order

They seemed to play tighter too - which sacrificed the punkier devil-may-care style which a lot of people like

It's swings and roundabouts lad.

0 likes

everyoneverywhere wrote:

Big Mouth Julio wrote: Think New order's best live performances were in 93. The Perfect Tune :clap:

I agree - Bernard's voice reached its peak here, which is why some New Order purists don't like the period so much - they WANT his crap singing, or it's not New Order

Bernard's shitty "I'm-an-important-artist-so-call-me-"sir"-and-bring-me-my-cocaine-on-a-silver-platter-NOW!!"-attitude also reached its peak at this point, which is another reason that people don't like this particular epoch. He was so much of a prima donna even Tony "just call me dah-ling, dah-ling" Wilson found him obnoxious. As if to prove his genius, Bernard took his football and ran off with his mate Johnny to make the second Electronic album - which is approximately the worst album EVER FUCKING MADE.

EVER.

If you want to be a 'proper singer', join Take fucking That. If you want to be a 'musician', join fucking Radiohead. Being 'professional' is for child pornographers.

Please can we have some sanity restored, eh?

0 likes

Clayhead Liberation Faction wrote:

everyoneverywhere wrote:

Big Mouth Julio wrote: Think New order's best live performances were in 93. The Perfect Tune :clap:

I agree - Bernard's voice reached its peak here, which is why some New Order purists don't like the period so much - they WANT his crap singing, or it's not New Order

Bernard's shitty "I'm-an-important-artist-so-call-me-"sir"-and-bring-me-my-cocaine-on-a-silver-platter-NOW!!"-attitude also reached its peak at this point, which is another reason that people don't like this particular epoch. He was so much of a prima donna even Tony "just call me dah-ling, dah-ling" Wilson found him obnoxious. As if to prove his genius, Bernard took his football and ran off with his mate Johnny to make the second Electronic album - which is approximately the worst album EVER FUCKING MADE.

EVER.

If you want to be a 'proper singer', join Take fucking That. If you want to be a 'musician', join fucking Radiohead. Being 'professional' is for child pornographers.

Please can we have some sanity restored, eh?

I must say, not once has Bernard ever struck me as the sort of person who would fit the description you give above. Did he insult you personally, or something?

0 likes

Zachery Starkey wrote:

Clayhead Liberation Faction wrote:

everyoneverywhere wrote:

Big Mouth Julio wrote: Think New order's best live performances were in 93. The Perfect Tune :clap:

I agree - Bernard's voice reached its peak here, which is why some New Order purists don't like the period so much - they WANT his crap singing, or it's not New Order

Bernard's shitty "I'm-an-important-artist-so-call-me-"sir"-and-bring-me-my-cocaine-on-a-silver-platter-NOW!!"-attitude also reached its peak at this point, which is another reason that people don't like this particular epoch. He was so much of a prima donna even Tony "just call me dah-ling, dah-ling" Wilson found him obnoxious. As if to prove his genius, Bernard took his football and ran off with his mate Johnny to make the second Electronic album - which is approximately the worst album EVER FUCKING MADE.

EVER.

If you want to be a 'proper singer', join Take fucking That. If you want to be a 'musician', join fucking Radiohead. Being 'professional' is for child pornographers.

Please can we have some sanity restored, eh?

I must say, not once has Bernard ever struck me as the sort of person who would fit the description you give above. Did he insult you personally, or something?

I don't know how people can call themselves fans and yet be so scathing??

No one is expected to like everything a band put's out, but some comments just take it to a new level.

0 likes

condemnation wrote: I don't know how people can call themselves fans and yet be so scathing??

No one is expected to like everything a band put's out, but some comments just take it to a new level.

:laugh:

I guess you've never read any of Clayhead's posts? :p

:smoking:

0 likes

JULIETTE wrote:

NO Regret wrote: Its a terrible album.The singing is horrid and theres so many bum notes by Barney, Hooks and Gillian its laughable.

The best song is TBTHOG. Temptation is ruined by a badly out of tune guitar. TPK,BLT,AOC have terrible guitar effects. Sister Ray is just crap. Cant remember the other songs.

A real shame as its a quality recording (as in clarity). Strange choice of original cover, as photo was from a concert in 1989 in Ibiza Cafe something (I believe). 2 years after bloody Glastonbury performance.

You can never have seen Nu Ordah live I take it?

I only got to see them in 2001 and 2005, when they were a bit more comfortable performing.

0 likes

You're leaving NewOrderOnline

This link goes to an external website we don't operate, which has its own privacy policy and terms.

Destination:
Continue ↗