Skip to content

I know this is almost two weeks old...but...

Archived

4 replies · 476 views

This is an archived legacy thread. Replies are closed, but the discussion is preserved.

sometimes it takes a while for Fox to get me my football matches over here...

this morning, they were showing a replay of the Birmingham-Man U match...and what the fook was the ref thinking when he gives the keeper a red card for his takedown of Scholes?

do I just not get the rules of the beautiful game yet, or did this clown make a huge error when he sent off Taylor???

0 likes

Was it Mike Riley?

0 likes

The law of our land states that all refs support Man U and all kids support Man U. (this has been ongoing for quite a large number of years)

2003 will be a good year to remember. Children from now on will start supporting Real Madrid (cos of Beckham) or Chelsea cos of their new found wealth.

The end of Man U is nigh.

:)

0 likes

Originally posted by Honky Whiteass© Was it Mike Riley?

oops...did I screw the keepers name up? :shrug:

0 likes

Originally posted by Jeff White > Originally posted by Honky Whiteass©> Was it Mike Riley?

oops...did I screw the keepers name up? :shrug:

I think HW was asking if the referee was called Mike Riley. I can't remember if it was, but he was going by the letter of the law, i.e. if the player fouled is the "last man" (no-one between him & goal except the keeper), then the player committing the foul must be sent off as he denied the player a clear goalscoring opportunity. Also known as a "professional foul". I think the referee was a bit harsh in this case, as awarding a penalty against the keeper was surely enough. Although, perhaps keeping van Nistelrooy's penalty record this season up to then (1/4!) in mind, maybe the ref didn't think a penalty would necessarily mean punishment.:wink:

0 likes

You're leaving NewOrderOnline

This link goes to an external website we don't operate, which has its own privacy policy and terms.

Destination:
Continue ↗