Porn? SP1?

Archived

38 replies · 863 views

This is an archived legacy thread. Replies are closed, but the discussion is preserved.

Showing posts 31–39 of 39 ↑ First post Latest post ↓

21 Apr 2004, 15:14

Originally posted by Detweiler 3.63 Tell you what, a Google search on that Angelica Bella has got me thinking about taking the day off tomorrow to have a ahem surf......

i had fun looking for those pictures and remembering the old days! that girl was the most beautiful of the old school 16mm porn movies. apart from the porn itself they offered you a story and a good filming quality. when you compare them to the newer ones (even though since years i don´t see one) when you only have a bed, and everyone is jumping there to do their things and finito... :shrug:

22 Apr 2004, 15:22

That's how it must be for me. Those movies pretending to have a plot are just ridiculous... (I mean, look at a porn set in the old wild west... you see the cowboys, the saloon, some idiot acting and dialogues, and just say "yeah, but when do they fuck the chicks?!" :D ) porn is about sex, and nothing else, the closer it gets to reality the better, that's why a rough amateur (with people doing it for fun) will always be better than those stupid Californian sophisticated movies with actresses looking like inflatable dolls (doing it for the money... erm, isn't it just like prostitution?) and useless special effects. Get a camera, some common people on a bed, and action, that's it... :D

22 Apr 2004, 15:25

peter saville would love this thread :D

22 Apr 2004, 21:33

Originally posted by Mick Aneworderfan That's how it must be for me. Those movies pretending to have a plot are just ridiculous... (I mean, look at a porn set in the old wild west... you see the cowboys, the saloon, some idiot acting and dialogues, and just say "yeah, but when do they fuck the chicks?!" :D ) porn is about sex, and nothing else, the closer it gets to reality the better, that's why a rough amateur (with people doing it for fun) will always be better than those stupid Californian sophisticated movies with actresses looking like inflatable dolls (doing it for the money... erm, isn't it just like prostitution?) and useless special effects.Get a camera, some common people on a bed, and action, that's it... :D

I agree. No one wants to wank to a bunch of overdelivered dialogue.

22 Apr 2004, 23:25

But don't you love the titles that play on "legit" movie titles?

23 Apr 2004, 04:28

Originally posted by bLuE oRdEr But don't you love the titles that play on "legit" movie titles?

You mean, like "Edward Penishands"?

23 Apr 2004, 07:51

think she thought she could sing as well :nuts: :nuts:

24 Apr 2004, 02:25

Originally posted by His Holiness, The Pope > Originally posted by bLuE oRdEr> But don't you love the titles that play on "legit" movie titles?

You mean, like "Edward Penishands"?

Precisely.

24 Apr 2004, 02:48

hehehe :evil4:

i remember one called "Jane Bond"