49 replies · 635 views
Who wants to start the bets on how long it'll take for the Repubs to be at the center of a riot? 
I hope to god they don't use 9/11...but you gotta think, being in New York automatically precludes them using it for their gain. Sick bastards 
Anyway, a healthy democracy needs debate and dissent, both which the Bushies are trying to get rid of. Let's hope NYC shows its true colors to the jerks hiding out in Madison Square Garden 
Well I believe the whole point they chose NY as the site for the RNC was because of 9/11. Cheney in a recent speech in NY talked about the Twin Towers not being up in the NY skyline anymore, blah blah blah...
Anyways, the Repubs have chosen the most telegenic people in Giulani, Schwarzenneger, and McCain to speak at the convention. Cheney will be the biggest policy speaker at the convention no doubt. The protesters in NY are confined to a small area just like they were for the DNC in Boston.
I hope someone riots. Nonviolent protests don't work in this country these days. Stupid hippies.
Originally posted by His Holiness, The Pope I hope someone riots. Nonviolent protests don't work in this country these days. Stupid hippies.
I agree David, but i think your country has suffered enough violence.
Michael Moore's going to be there, so I assume there will be a riot and it will be caught on tape.
Originally posted by This blue-eyed boy that wants to be Michael Moore's going to be there, so I assume there will be a riot and it will be caught on tape.
He's too fat to riot; there is no way he can run from the police. All he can do is waddle around in front of a camera and write books.
Just saw the demonstration on the news, 100,000 people turned up including Michael Moore, there was no rioting (not with 12,000 cops watching their every move), although somebody started a fire.
100,000 is the cops number. 250,000 is the organisers number. A general rule for protests:
[(cops number)+(organisers number)] / 2
= real number
So I reckon around 175,000
This isn’t a great number considering the size of the city -if the RNC was in Dublin; I reckon we could pull out more onto the streets.
The pope is right – non violent action is worthless. Generally what happens is a load of hippies decide nobody will have any fun (except the cops) tell everyone to be peaceful (and a crowd of around 175,000 is generally peaceful) then the cops lay into a few on the fringes, everyone gets pissed off, the cops arrest a predefined number (say 100) for the news reports, and the protest is said to be “violent”.
You may as well go in for the kill with a crowd that size, and actively confront the cops.
I don’t know who I have less time for : crusties, hippies, or cops.
Most NYC cops are redneck, Irish, racist, homophobes I hear. Most Irish cops are.................too
I agree 175,000 is a miniscule number for a protest in New York. For Kerry's sake, I hope the protests remain peaceful, for I believe anything rash and idiotic would truly have an adverse effect on the undecided of America, who probably tend not to be of the same young, liberal demographic of the protestors. If the undecided become scared, then they may vote for Bush. For all I care, I hope for Bush that the protestors go break things and loot.
Originally posted by Buffer Low > Originally posted by His Holiness, The Pope> I hope someone riots. Nonviolent protests don't work in this country these days. Stupid hippies.
I agree David, but i think your country has suffered enough violence. No, my country has CAUSED enough violence, and it's time for someone to take the fall.
Originally posted by His Holiness, The Pope > Originally posted by Buffer Low> > > > Originally posted by His Holiness, The Pope> > I hope someone riots. Nonviolent protests don't work in this country these days. Stupid hippies.>
I agree David, but i think your country has suffered enough violence. No, my country has CAUSED enough violence, and it's time for someone to take the fall.
Goddamn you crazy Washingtonians; weren't the WTO protests enough for you guys? ;)
Originally posted by Tristan > Originally posted by His Holiness, The Pope> > > > Originally posted by Buffer Low> > > > > > > Originally posted by His Holiness, The Pope> > > I hope someone riots. Nonviolent protests don't work in this country these days. Stupid hippies.> > >
I agree David, but i think your country has suffered enough violence. No, my country has CAUSED enough violence, and it's time for someone to take the fall.
Goddamn you crazy Washingtonians; weren't the WTO protests enough for you guys? ;)
Or the Pentagon? More violence has come out of that place over the last 50 years than in all humanity preceeding it.
Originally posted by Clockwork C > Originally posted by Tristan> > > > Originally posted by His Holiness, The Pope> > > > > > > Originally posted by Buffer Low> > > > > > > > > > Originally posted by His Holiness, The Pope> > > > I hope someone riots. Nonviolent protests don't work in this country these days. Stupid hippies.> > > > > >
I agree David, but i think your country has suffered enough violence. No, my country has CAUSED enough violence, and it's time for someone to take the fall.
Goddamn you crazy Washingtonians; weren't the WTO protests enough for you guys? ;)
Or the Pentagon? More violence has come out of that place over the last 50 years than in all humanity preceeding it.
Oh you fuckin' Irish can complain about violence. I wonder how long it'll take for the IRA to resume its attacks.
Originally posted by Tristan > Originally posted by His Holiness, The Pope> > > > Originally posted by Buffer Low> > > > > > > Originally posted by His Holiness, The Pope> > > I hope someone riots. Nonviolent protests don't work in this country these days. Stupid hippies.> > >
I agree David, but i think your country has suffered enough violence. No, my country has CAUSED enough violence, and it's time for someone to take the fall.
Goddamn you crazy Washingtonians; weren't the WTO protests enough for you guys? ;) Not really. That was quite an experience, though. Never been part of a protest movement like that before, and I might never be again. Oh, and for the record, I learned on that particular day that tear gas is not at all comfortable.
Originally posted by Tristan > Originally posted by Clockwork C> > > > Originally posted by Tristan> > > > > > > Originally posted by His Holiness, The Pope> > > > > > > > > > Originally posted by Buffer Low> > > > > > > > > > > > > Originally posted by His Holiness, The Pope> > > > > I hope someone riots. Nonviolent protests don't work in this country these days. Stupid hippies.> > > > > > > > > >
I agree David, but i think your country has suffered enough violence. No, my country has CAUSED enough violence, and it's time for someone to take the fall.
Goddamn you crazy Washingtonians; weren't the WTO protests enough for you guys? ;)
Or the Pentagon? More violence has come out of that place over the last 50 years than in all humanity preceeding it.
Oh you fuckin' Irish can complain about violence. I wonder how long it'll take for the IRA to resume its attacks.
Attacks on what? The IRA have basically disbanded, and have to an extent decommissioned. The Continuity- and Real-IRA may still exist but they also do feck all.
And they also don't go attacking people thousands and thousands of miles away, unlike the US
Oh, and you'll also note that *all* the currently even semi active IRA members are from Northern Ireland. And are hence subjects of the United Kingdom. Not Irish.
Originally posted by MYOB > Originally posted by Tristan> > > > Originally posted by Clockwork C> > > > > > > Originally posted by Tristan> > > > > > > > > > Originally posted by His Holiness, The Pope> > > > > > > > > > > > > Originally posted by Buffer Low> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Originally posted by His Holiness, The Pope> > > > > > I hope someone riots. Nonviolent protests don't work in this country these days. Stupid hippies.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
I agree David, but i think your country has suffered enough violence. No, my country has CAUSED enough violence, and it's time for someone to take the fall.
Goddamn you crazy Washingtonians; weren't the WTO protests enough for you guys? ;)
Or the Pentagon? More violence has come out of that place over the last 50 years than in all humanity preceeding it.
Oh you fuckin' Irish can complain about violence. I wonder how long it'll take for the IRA to resume its attacks.
Attacks on what? The IRA have basically disbanded, and have to an extent decommissioned. The Continuity- and Real-IRA may still exist but they also do feck all.
And they also don't go attacking people thousands and thousands of miles away, unlike the US
Boohoo, we attacked Iraq, and Saddam is gone. Maybe the war cannot be justified by our original reason for going to war, but there are plenty of arguments that can be made now to justify it. Violence is part of human nature and always will be. Frankly you saying the Pentagon is the reason for more violence than the 50 years preceding it is ignorant. In the last fifty years there has been the Korean War, Vietnam, Grenada, Chile, Lebanon, Iraq, Yugoslavia, Haiti, etc. Now were all these incidents our faults, not at all. I just blurted a comment about the Irish in response to: 'Or the Pentagon? More violence has come out of that place over the last 50 years than in all humanity preceeding it' This is pure shite. The Soviets, the Chinese, some African tribes, etc. have been responsible for many more deaths than the US has. the US has not conducted many military actions when being militarily unprovoked itself or when an ally has been unprovoked. The US did many shady things during the Cold War (Allende, the Sandanistas, etc.) But considering all of this, does it still come anywhere close to Soviet, Chinese, and ethnic cleansings in Rwanda? Be realistic, the US has done many things in the interest of peace, but only if there was an underlying economic interest. The US has been the strongest superpower these past fifty years, and us having to deal with many military conflicts was to be expected. If you wish for no more war in the world, then you are plain mistaken.
Originally posted by His Holiness, The Pope > Originally posted by Buffer Low> > > > Originally posted by His Holiness, The Pope> > I hope someone riots. Nonviolent protests don't work in this country these days. Stupid hippies.>
I agree David, but i think your country has suffered enough violence. No, my country has CAUSED enough violence, and it's time for someone to take the fall. You have a point there David, Goodbye President Junior.
Boohoo, we attacked Iraq, and Saddam is gone. Maybe the war cannot be justified by our original reason for going to war, but there are plenty of arguments that can be made now to justify it. Violence is part of human nature and always will be. Frankly you saying the Pentagon is the reason for more violence than the 50 years preceding it is ignorant. In the last fifty years there has been the Korean War, Vietnam, Grenada, Chile, Lebanon, Iraq, Yugoslavia, Haiti, etc. Now were all these incidents our faults, not at all. I just blurted a comment about the Irish in response to: 'Or the Pentagon? More violence has come out of that place over the last 50 years than in all humanity preceeding it' This is pure shite. The Soviets, the Chinese, some African tribes, etc. have been responsible for many more deaths than the US has. the US has not conducted many military actions when being militarily unprovoked itself or when an ally has been unprovoked. The US did many shady things during the Cold War (Allende, the Sandanistas, etc.) But considering all of this, does it still come anywhere close to Soviet, Chinese, and ethnic cleansings in Rwanda? Be realistic, the US has done many things in the interest of peace, but only if there was an underlying economic interest. The US has been the strongest superpower these past fifty years, and us having to deal with many military conflicts was to be expected. If you wish for no more war in the world, then you are plain mistaken.
You have a sad but brutally realistic point there mate.
Not really. That was quite an experience, though. Never been part of a protest movement like that before, and I might never be again. Oh, and for the record, I learned on that particular day that tear gas is not at all comfortable.
David, you were part of the "Battle Of Seattle"? how did you end up being part of it? and what was it really like? did you feel like you achieved anything? it must have been amazing to be part of it.
Originally posted by Buffer Low > Not really. That was quite an experience, though. Never been part of a protest movement like that before, and I might never be again. Oh, and for the record, I learned on that particular day that tear gas is not at all comfortable.
David, you were part of the "Battle Of Seattle"? how did you end up being part of it? and what was it really like? did you feel like you achieved anything? it must have been amazing to be part of it.
Yes, it was quite exciting. We made the mistake of branching off from the major march route and ended up at an intersection (4th and Union) barricaded by riot cops. I suppose we should've guessed that things wouldn't be all that peaceful since we were right next to the Wobblies from the IWW, and they certainly don't have a history of nonviolence (especially in the local area where there was a massacre of them on the Everett docks back in the early 20th century). Anyway, cops started wading into the crowd and pepper-spraying people or beating them over the head a few times, prompting everyone to sit down until the cops cleared off. But that didn't last long and then everyone got REALLY nervous and started putting on gas masks; I managed to tear a strip of clear plastic from some debris nearby and wrap it around my eyes. Then they launched one of those concussion grenades into the crowd which went off about 10 feet away from me and my friends (we were about 15 feet back from the line of cops). Then everyone started screaming and running like mad, so we blindly made a human chain and ran back a block as tear gas started seeping up. I have a photo we took from a block away, right after it happened (and seconds before another volley of concussion grenades encouraged us to move on)--but I don't know how to use my roommate's scanner. Needless to say, we were VERY furious at the police, but I suppose what they did was inevitable and we were just waiting for it. Still, I feel that the violence of the day made it more of an international event than it would have otherwise been, so in that respect, I suppose it was a good thing. Huge protests seem to happen around the world all the time, but one hardly ever hears about them--so hopefully people took notice and tried to see what all the fuss was about.
Dubya speaks tonight...and unless he suddenly apologizes for lying about WMDs, I don't plan on watching much except to "crush" his head ala Kids In The Hall
Lying about WMDs? I don't know that it was lying. I still think that Dubya honestly believed that Saddam had these weapons. Of course, nobody ever suffers from being misinformed, now do they?
Noticed that they were reaching out to the Gay Vote by having Brooks&Dunn for musical entertainment?
actually T, I am in quite a quandry...I don't want to vote for either of them, and it appears that Mr. Nader will be tossed off the ballot here in Texas for "irregularities"...
can I vote for myself???
Originally posted by Jeff actually T, I am in quite a quandry...I don't want to vote for either of them, and it appears that Mr. Nader will be tossed off the ballot here in Texas for "irregularities"...can I vote for myself???
Wait until the debates and decide then.
Hmmmmm.
Taking Tristan’s well-articulated, concise, theoretical dialectic into account, I have decided to reject all this liberal commie nonsense, and grow up.
As a sensible Adult, I feel compelled to talk down to David regarding his antics at the WTO talks. Don’t you know David, that those hard working, honourable, moral, Christian men and women in the IMF and WTO are trying to spread freedom, and cheap coffee, and open markets across the world, and freedom.
Terrorists like you are halting their freedom to talk, and give good jobs to third world workers, who would have no hope without their local Export Processing Zone. You are stopping people from achieving David, because they have to pay communist welfare.
You support the death of unborn babies, but not the death sentence of rapists. You are morally decrepit. How can you use the moniker of “your holyness”?
I lost my legs to some Chinaman in Korea, but I went ahead and achieved anyway. Your revolution is over David, commiserations, the bums lost!
Originally posted by Clockwork C Hmmmmm. Taking Tristan’s well-articulated, concise, theoretical dialectic into account, I have decided to reject all this liberal commie nonsense, and grow up. As a sensible Adult, I feel compelled to talk down to David regarding his antics at the WTO talks. Don’t you know David, that those hard working, honourable, moral, Christian men and women in the IMF and WTO are trying to spread freedom, and cheap coffee, and open markets across the world, and freedom. Terrorists like you are halting their freedom to talk, and give good jobs to third world workers, who would have no hope without their local Export Processing Zone. You are stopping people from achieving David, because they have to pay communist welfare. You support the death of unborn babies, but not the death sentence of rapists. You are morally decrepit. How can you use the moniker of “your holyness”? I lost my legs to some Chinaman in Korea, but I went ahead and achieved anyway. Your revolution is over David, commiserations, the bums lost! Vote like I wish I could
Now you're making sense! 
I blame the liberal media for all the positive spin the Repubs receive...oh, wait 
Where was the "Alabama Air Guard Veterans for Truth"?
Oh, and "four more weeks!" (hopefully an impeachment, followed by the death of Ralph Reed during a gay orgy at Pat Robertson's bachelor pad in San Fran)
What's all this Mc Cain business?? Is he going to go for it in 2004? Last I remembered he was on the GOP shitlist.
Zel Miller kicks ass. He pimp slaps John Kerry and Chris Mathews in the same week. Delicious. 
Originally posted by Michael McDermott Zel Miller kicks ass. He pimp slaps John Kerry and Chris Mathews in the same week. Delicious.
Miller's speech was great, but it was a bit over the top. His anger made all the other Repub.s seem nice and tame.
Originally posted by Tristan > Originally posted by Michael McDermott> Zel Miller kicks ass. He pimp slaps John Kerry and Chris Mathews in the same week. Delicious.
Miller's speech was great, but it was a bit over the top. His anger made all the other Repub.s seem nice and tame.
You may have a point there. However, I think the larger issue was that Zel Miller contrasted the Democratic party he grew up in to the one it has become better that any Republican ever could.
Ah yes, the good old days of Separate but Equal. Sniff.
Speaking of chumps, er, chimps, look, he's almost upright, and soon to learn that what goes around comes around. Chump. I mean chimp.
I still blame the liberal media for everything. Hell, they lost us the War of 1812 (we had Tecumsah beat, and King George has his ass handed to him in New Orleans, but no we have to have a peace treaty!)
Originally posted by bLuE oRdEr Ah yes, the good old days of Separate but Equal. Sniff. Speaking of chumps, er, chimps, look, he's almost upright, and soon to learn that what goes around comes around. Chump. I mean chimp.
The Bush National Guard ads won't matter a bit. Kerry's campaign was centered around the premise that his military service record would lead him to be a great foreign policy leader of the United States. Making his military service a central part of his campaign opened the door for conservatives to look at every minutia of his record in order to find some inconsistencies. If Kerry didn't put forth his military service record so staunchly in the DNC and prior, then the conservatives would not have bothered to nitpick whether he deserved one of his purple hearts or not. If a politician runs on his military record (or any record of any kind), then he must make sure it's consistent with what he presently says or claims. Kerry's campaigners were idiots, hence why many of the upper echelon of his campaign were fired recently.
Also Kerry has made another awfully idiotic speech this morning in Ohio (I think it was 
). Please for the love of god, do not talk about Iraq! Kerry's voting record on the matter is spotty, Bush's presidential decisions about the matter are spotty as well, so it's a wash. If he continues to vigorously speak about foreign policy, then he'll lose. The easiest manner to bash Bush is to attack the economy (even if it is not Bush's fault [cycling]). Also attacking education and putting forth an alternative to the heaivly underfunded NCLB measures would serve Kerry well. For an incumbent, Bush is heavily unpopular and if Kerry loses the election, then it is due to another idiotic Democratic campaign a la Gore and Dukakis.
Originally posted by Taboo # 7 I still blame the liberal media for everything. Hell, they lost us the War of 1812 (we had Tecumsah beat, and King George has his ass handed to him in New Orleans, but no we have to have a peace treaty!)
Ok so let us go raid the Indian casinos and prep a war on the Mother country.
Originally posted by Tristan > Originally posted by bLuE oRdEr> Ah yes, the good old days of Separate but Equal. Sniff. Speaking of chumps, er, chimps, look, he's almost upright, and soon to learn that what goes around comes around. Chump. I mean chimp.
For an incumbent, Bush is heavily unpopular and if Kerry loses the election, then it is due to another idiotic Democratic campaign a la Gore and Dukakis.
The election is Kerry's to lose.
Originally posted by bLuE oRdEr > Originally posted by Tristan> > > > > > > Originally posted by bLuE oRdEr> > Ah yes, the good old days of Separate but Equal. Sniff. Speaking of chumps, er, chimps, look, he's almost upright, and soon to learn that what goes around comes around. Chump. I mean chimp.>
For an incumbent, Bush is heavily unpopular and if Kerry loses the election, then it is due to another idiotic Democratic campaign a la Gore and Dukakis.
The election is Kerry's to lose.
And he is losing it.
Originally posted by bLuE oRdEr Maybe he should take some tips from Howard Dean. ;)
He needs to stop the face-lifts or whatever he is doing to remove the wrinkles from his face. Damn Cher looks more natural than him right now.
what did the pope say on the russian thread? im interested!
this RNC NYC shit is about as interesting and important as the christina vs britney debate.
Originally posted by Clockwork C what did the pope say on the russian thread? im interested! this RNC NYC shit is about as interesting and important as the christina vs britney debate.
Christina has the better voice, but Britney is hotter. Britney wins because of the mute button on my remote. 
Originally posted by Clockwork C what did the pope say on the russian thread? im interested!this RNC NYC shit is about as interesting and important as the christina vs britney debate.
Only if you think it's a choice between tweedle dee and tweedle dumb.
Originally posted by bLuE oRdEr > Originally posted by Clockwork C> what did the pope say on the russian thread? im interested! this RNC NYC shit is about as interesting and important as the christina vs britney debate.
Only if you think it's a choice between tweedle dee and tweedle dumb.
Hey hey, those monikers are solely for Nader and Kerry.
