Old Hatreds Die Hard

Al Jarvis wrote: Link: Lee Trundle and flag

I honestly thought this was a joke when someone sent it to me yesterday and that the FCUK OFF had just been super-imposed over the top.

Funny, for about 5 seconds, but all the players involved might live to regret this!

Swansea are being investigated by the Football Association of Wales and the police for taunting Cardiff City after Sunday's Football League Trophy win.

The police need to stay the fcuk outta this. It makes sense for FA Wales to get involved....

what a plonker

Be intesresting to see what sort of a suspension he gets.

Good job it wasnt in front of Liverpool fans, they'd be OUTRAGED.....again

Why 'Possibly' Barney Army?

Possibly Barney Army wrote: what a plonker

Be intesresting to see what sort of a suspension he gets.

Good job it wasnt in front of Liverpool fans, they'd be OUTRAGED.....again

nah!! he's a scouser. we'd laugh. boss goal he scored yesterday. anyone see it? worthy of the Prem. i hear Manscousester City need a striker.

Missy Jem wrote: Why 'Possibly' Barney Army?

identity crisis?

Erm so they brandished swearing?

Or was it the subject thereof that's causing bother?

Missy Jem wrote: Why 'Possibly' Barney Army?

A post popped up on another thread that I didnt write. I'm not sure who I am anymore

Possibly Barney Army wrote:

Missy Jem wrote: Why 'Possibly' Barney Army?

A post popped up on another thread that I didnt write. I'm not sure who I am anymore

LOL.....you sure it wasn't the "other" BA, that comes out after midnight and 15 pints?

:D

Steve Campbell wrote:

Possibly Barney Army wrote:

Missy Jem wrote: Why 'Possibly' Barney Army?

A post popped up on another thread that I didnt write. I'm not sure who I am anymore

LOL.....you sure it wasn't the "other" BA, that comes out after midnight and 15 pints?

:D

No that is BARNEY HAMMERED

Al Jarvis wrote:

ChrissMari wrote: The police need to stay the fcuk outta this. It makes sense for FA Wales to get involved....

You can get done for 'Incitement to riot' in this country.

Not that there were any Baa-rdiff fans there to riot anyways?!

I'd be more worried about the possibility of any of those players coming up against Cardiff during the rest of their careers! Ouch!

incitement to riot is a real crime and it's something we don't want people to do... i think in that country the laws are a bit restrictive or not so tolerant as to what behavior will incite riots.

never big on personal freedoms over there though

J.A.K wrote:

Possibly Barney Army wrote: what a plonker

Be intesresting to see what sort of a suspension he gets.

Good job it wasnt in front of Liverpool fans, they'd be OUTRAGED.....again

nah!! he's a scouser. we'd laugh. boss goal he scored yesterday. anyone see it? worthy of the Prem. i hear Manscousester City need a striker.

Dude, man city need a team after yesterdays performance :) Have you seen the, post match, interview with Pearce yet? I swear he was nearly in tears.

Pearcy will end up walking.

he'll never get players as committed as he was as a player.

J.A.K wrote: Pearcy will end up walking.

he'll never get players as committed as he was as a player.

especially not for a mid table team constantly amazed by not getting relegated

<3 mcfc CTID

Talk about REAL bad sportsmanship.

Possibly Barney Army wrote:

Missy Jem wrote: Why 'Possibly' Barney Army?

A post popped up on another thread that I didnt write. I'm not sure who I am anymore

You posted a double thread, so I went in to delete it, but then thought fook it I'll put a message in there, which should show up as done by me, but for some reason it didn't show up as edited or the time and date of the edit! Same has happened to other mods today I notice, the time of the last post is not the same as when it was edited, such as the gigs announcement thread in Ceremony - Nic updated it earlier yet it still shows the last update as being from Shug a few days before. Glitch in the system!

Phew!

Definitely Barney Army wrote: Phew!

Great this means you are a TRUE red.Well done son.On me head!

I see that you've got Killers lyrics on your avatar, Mick.

[magenta]cozmonite61[/magenta] wrote: I see that you've got Killers lyrics on your avatar, Mick.

You know, I'm one for "anything goes" in BCD but this is just taking the piss, really.

You just had nothing to add so you grabbed something out of thin air?

It's a mess.

ChrissMari wrote:

never big on personal freedoms over there though

a different interpretation of 'personal freedoms,' i'd say.

a (rather simplistic) example:

US: the personal freedom of gun ownership

UK: the personal freedom not to be shot at

AgentWood wrote:

ChrissMari wrote:

never big on personal freedoms over there though

a different interpretation of 'personal freedoms,' i'd say.

a (rather simplistic) example:

US: the personal freedom of gun ownership

UK: the personal freedom not to be shot at

that *is* pretty simplistic

but i was more thinking (also simplistic)

US: Call someone a fcukin n**gger distasteful but not against the law (until a physical action takes place or if it incites an action) UK: Call someone a fcukin pakki distasteful and a crime inciting racial *hatred* a feeling, not even an action--so what's that mean? the government is policing your thoughts and feelings

Arguing that the UK is a nanny state because of gun ownership issues is not my thing, especially when there are freedom of conscience issues which imho are much more glaring.

ChrissMari wrote:

[magenta]cozmonite61[/magenta] wrote: I see that you've got Killers lyrics on your avatar, Mick.

You know, I'm one for "anything goes" in BCD but this is just taking the piss, really.

You just had nothing to add so you grabbed something out of thin air?

It's a mess.

I was merely making a comment, Chrissi. I have said that I post whatever is interesting and comes to mind at the moment.

ChrissMari wrote:

AgentWood wrote:

ChrissMari wrote:

never big on personal freedoms over there though

a different interpretation of 'personal freedoms,' i'd say.

a (rather simplistic) example:

US: the personal freedom of gun ownership

UK: the personal freedom not to be shot at

that *is* pretty simplistic

but i was more thinking (also simplistic)

US: Call someone a fcukin n**gger distasteful but not against the law (until a physical action takes place or if it incites an action) UK: Call someone a fcukin pakki distasteful and a crime inciting racial *hatred* a feeling, not even an action--so what's that mean? the government is policing your thoughts and feelings

Arguing that the UK is a nanny state because of gun ownership issues is not my thing, especially when there are freedom of conscience issues which imho are much more glaring.

I must say that,to me, as a (albeit outlying) UK citizen....it looks like you guys are in the more repressive society. Odd that.

Not having a dig, just saying it looks that way from here.

[magenta]cozmonite61[/magenta] wrote:

ChrissMari wrote:

[magenta]cozmonite61[/magenta] wrote: I see that you've got Killers lyrics on your avatar, Mick.

You know, I'm one for "anything goes" in BCD but this is just taking the piss, really.

You just had nothing to add so you grabbed something out of thin air?

It's a mess.

I was merely making a comment, Chrissi. I have said that I post whatever is interesting and comes to mind at the moment.

Just because you've said it doesn't mean other people have lost their right to comment on such activity.

Get a livejournal, rather than your blog. Something where you know people are reading and the attention you so desperately seek is satiated. I'll add you to my friends list. I'll get others to as well. You can make random comments on what people have to say. You'll make friends and you'll be able to stop pissing people off here.

Steve Campbell wrote:

ChrissMari wrote:

AgentWood wrote:

ChrissMari wrote:

never big on personal freedoms over there though

a different interpretation of 'personal freedoms,' i'd say.

a (rather simplistic) example:

US: the personal freedom of gun ownership

UK: the personal freedom not to be shot at

that *is* pretty simplistic

but i was more thinking (also simplistic)

US: Call someone a fcukin n**gger distasteful but not against the law (until a physical action takes place or if it incites an action) UK: Call someone a fcukin pakki distasteful and a crime inciting racial *hatred* a feeling, not even an action--so what's that mean? the government is policing your thoughts and feelings

Arguing that the UK is a nanny state because of gun ownership issues is not my thing, especially when there are freedom of conscience issues which imho are much more glaring.

I must say that,to me, as a (albeit outlying) UK citizen....it looks like you guys are in the more repressive society. Odd that.

Not having a dig, just saying it looks that way from here.

society and government are two different things patriot act notwithstanding we don't outlaw speech, thought and feelings here.

Erm didn't someone get lifted for wearing a T-shirt ( A shirt that if memory serves simply bore a fact)?

FWIW, our incitement laws are rarely used, they just happen to be there. To be honest they don't get used enough in NI LOL

Chrissi, I have a blog already. Now can't we just get along? Anyway, back on the topic. I hope that there is a resolution to such unsportsmanlike conduct. I'm surprised that the police are involved in it, but I don't know if something significant can be done.

[magenta]cozmonite61[/magenta] wrote: Chrissi, I have a blog already. Now can't we just get along? Anyway, back on the topic. I hope that there is a resolution to such unsportsmanlike conduct. I'm surprised that the police are involved in it, but I don't know if something significant can be done.

I know you have a blog. I'm just saying that obviously the blog isn't good enough. Get a livejournal blog and that way you can interact with people who post there.

I'm not hating.. I'm just trying to lead you down the path of righteousness

ChrissMari wrote:

society and government are two different things patriot act notwithstanding we don't outlaw speech, thought and feelings here.

we do have our moments, though. such as back in 1990 when a record store salesman was arrested for selling a 2 live crew album as the band's records had been banned in broward county (?), FL.