Tomorrow's A Day With Out An Immigrant
Archived65 replies · 947 views
I'm ready to call one of the employers and beg for their absent worker's job.... again.
Really, I'm all for my legal immigrant neighbors, who are going out to counter protest millions of people trying to get mass-legalized when it took the people next door to us 6 years to get here through the proper channels.
Should prove interesting.
If anything al they will accomplish is to piss off American voters. Most businesses should be prepared. I know we are and are looking forward to the savings in labor costs.
Tonight I talked to my friend that owns a small factory in Chicago area and we recalled a conversation we had many years ago. We both agreed that legal immigrants were about the best people to hire. Americans tend to be very unreliable. He will be missing 2 employees, I will be missing about 4. Hate to see the quality of worker missing but there are plenty of applications to take their spot if we lose them.
Twist, singer of the Blessing Way wrote: If anything al they will accomplish is to piss off American voters. Most businesses should be prepared. I know we are and are looking forward to the savings in labor costs.
Tonight I talked to my friend that owns a small factory in Chicago area and we recalled a conversation we had many years ago. We both agreed that legal immigrants were about the best people to hire. Americans tend to be very unreliable. He will be missing 2 employees, I will be missing about 4. Hate to see the quality of worker missing but there are plenty of applications to take their spot if we lose them.
True thoughts there.
A day of boycotting really only hurts themselves.
JHC
I'm really sick of this BS wedge issue completely fabricated by Karl Rove and the republicans for their "get out the base" vote for 2006. This is exactly the same thing as the gay marriage fabricated wedge issue that was used in the 2004 campaign.
Why wasn't this a "crisis" 6 months ago? Why wasn't there proposed legislation a year ago...because it didn't have any benefit for Frist and the republican majority.
All those that are marching today are being USED and manipulated so that fox news and the local papers in Ohio, Pennsylvania, Tennessee etc can run stories about the mexican illegals "demanding more stuff" while "waving the mexican flag" and "singing the national anthem in spanish".
There will be no legislation about immigration because the republicans would never risk alienating the mexican american community...they are just using this to scare their white religious base into getting out and voting in november.
Also...this is a great way to keep the WAR in Iraq off the front page along with the stories about high gas prices.
hi..ignorant euro-weenie here.
So no imigrants are going to work today right?
Seems the Native Americans will be hellish busy :D
By the word "immigrant", do they mean people who are in the US illegally, or do they mean people who's ancestors were immigrants (or even people who became naturalised American citizens)?
i really don't know what is going on here. i thought even bush realized that the us economy couldn't function without the illegal workers.
frack by all means strengthen the border with mexico, but go easy on those hard working migrants.
leather_girl wrote: or do they mean people who's ancestors were immigrants (or even people who became naturalised American citizens)?
then that would be everyone, everyone, besides illegal immigrants!
Hydrapelican wrote: I'm really sick of this BS wedge issue completely fabricated by Karl Rove and the republicans for their "get out the base" vote for 2006. This is exactly the same thing as the gay marriage fabricated wedge issue that was used in the 2004 campaign.
Why wasn't this a "crisis" 6 months ago? Why wasn't there proposed legislation a year ago...because it didn't have any benefit for Frist and the republican majority.
All those that are marching today are being USED and manipulated so that fox news and the local papers in Ohio, Pennsylvania, Tennessee etc can run stories about the mexican illegals "demanding more stuff" while "waving the mexican flag" and "singing the national anthem in spanish".
There will be no legislation about immigration because the republicans would never risk alienating the mexican american community...they are just using this to scare their white religious base into getting out and voting in november.
Also...this is a great way to keep the WAR in Iraq off the front page along with the stories about high gas prices.
Such is Politics. Happens on BOTH sides, Republican and Democrat.
A minor correction, but the war in Iraq is over, it is now by definition an occupation.
NOOLigan wrote: i really don't know what is going on here. i thought even bush realized that the us economy couldn't function without the illegal workers.
I don't think the people that are protesting really understand what they are protesting for or against. I think they are all bandwagoning over national pride, not over a real issue. Unless I'm missing the full point as well.
JHC
Hydrapelican wrote: I'm really sick of this BS wedge issue completely fabricated by Karl Rove and the republicans for their "get out the base" vote for 2006. This is exactly the same thing as the gay marriage fabricated wedge issue that was used in the 2004 campaign.
Why wasn't this a "crisis" 6 months ago? Why wasn't there proposed legislation a year ago...because it didn't have any benefit for Frist and the republican majority.
All those that are marching today are being USED and manipulated so that fox news and the local papers in Ohio, Pennsylvania, Tennessee etc can run stories about the mexican illegals "demanding more stuff" while "waving the mexican flag" and "singing the national anthem in spanish".
There will be no legislation about immigration because the republicans would never risk alienating the mexican american community...they are just using this to scare their white religious base into getting out and voting in november.
Also...this is a great way to keep the WAR in Iraq off the front page along with the stories about high gas prices.
Wait, since when did Pennsylvania get lumped in with the backwards hick states? Aside from Reagan we've gone Democrat since Kennedy.
T not withstanding this state is home to two world class cities and culture :)
Hey Chris...no offence meant on any of the states themselves...I just mean that there are battleground states that the Republicans are trying to rally their base (and Pennsylvania is certainly a battleground state) in and they are using this issue du jour to whip up fear and anxiety in their base.
To the previous writer...fair point on it being an occupation in Iraq...and that politics gets played on both sides...just pointing out that I believe that it is a smokescreen/wedge issue and not really worthy of serious debate. Lou Dobbs is rabid on this issue and has attempted to make it a serious debate...that is certainly valid...but the whole legislation to make it a "felony" to help an illegal alien is just chum for the rabid right.
Hydrapelican wrote: Hey Chris...no offence meant on any of the states themselves...I just mean that there are battleground states that the Republicans are trying to rally their base (and Pennsylvania is certainly a battleground state) in and they are using this issue du jour to whip up fear and anxiety in their base.
PA is not a battleground state Red state blue state is a fiction
Now you can take that with a HUGE grain of salt because I work for the state democratic party, but there you go
They should do one with all the immigrants we get because they were refused by the US, and then become Canadian citizen (after 3 years) and then go to the US...
Hydrapelican wrote: Hey Chris...no offence meant on any of the states themselves...I just mean that there are battleground states that the Republicans are trying to rally their base (and Pennsylvania is certainly a battleground state) in and they are using this issue du jour to whip up fear and anxiety in their base.
To the previous writer...fair point on it being an occupation in Iraq...and that politics gets played on both sides...just pointing out that I believe that it is a smokescreen/wedge issue and not really worthy of serious debate. Lou Dobbs is rabid on this issue and has attempted to make it a serious debate...that is certainly valid...but the whole legislation to make it a "felony" to help an illegal alien is just chum for the rabid right.
I guess I don't know enough onthe issue. When you say a felony for helping an illegal, what does that entail? Helping them cross the border, harbouring them, employing them, or all the above?
JHC
Hydrapelican wrote: I'm really sick of this BS wedge issue completely fabricated by Karl Rove and the republicans for their "get out the base" vote for 2006. This is exactly the same thing as the gay marriage fabricated wedge issue that was used in the 2004 campaign.
Why wasn't this a "crisis" 6 months ago? Why wasn't there proposed legislation a year ago...because it didn't have any benefit for Frist and the republican majority.
All those that are marching today are being USED and manipulated so that fox news and the local papers in Ohio, Pennsylvania, Tennessee etc can run stories about the mexican illegals "demanding more stuff" while "waving the mexican flag" and "singing the national anthem in spanish".
What will the Republicans benefit exactly by this "manipulation"? Do the Democrats stand behind those illegal immigrants?
Shed Peel wrote: Someone at work asked me why we didn't have May 5th off for Cinco de Mayo.
Nevertheless the commercials on tv are all about the Cinco de Mayo (cerveza! ;) ).
Here's my problem with the situation: every day when I work, I come into contact with Mexican and other Latino immigrants who come into the store and try to get food for their families. They're usually on food stamps, but they also have cash from the jobs that they work (and that a hell of a lot of "natives" I know wouldn't sniff at). To paint them all as "welching off the government without contributing something back" is borderline racist, at best. ![]()
Sure, there are some who live off the dole, but you can say that of every racial group. If you come to this country illegally but do your best to provide for your family and get naturalized, you shouldn't be penalized. And stop with the goddam "learn the language" crap, okay. English is easily the hardest language to learn, especially if you're past the early stages of childhood when the capacity to learn and distinguish between languages. Don't give me this bullshit that "they should learn our language", sure it would be nice if they were able to speak English but maybe we (us "natives" should try, just try, to learn a little Spanish. It wouldn't kill you to learn the preterite form of "tener", would it? ![]()
If you want to build a wall on the Rio Grande, hey, go ahead. Just be prepared to work all day out in the orange and vegetable groves under the hot sun, that's all. Oh, and get paid barely enough to get by ![]()
Taboo # 7 wrote:
If you want to build a wall on the Rio Grande, hey, go ahead. Just be prepared to work all day out in the orange and vegetable groves under the hot sun, that's all. Oh, and get paid barely enough to get by
Eh but the problem is indeed that those "dirty" jobs are paid poorly because the employers know they can save on labor costs since there's a blossoming market of cheap labor provided by the illegal immigrants.
Shut this market down and the employers will be reduced to pay higher to get ANYONE to work for them, including white Americans. Or: no oranges for you. ![]()
|| | ||| 6217|| 8 || 3 wrote:
Taboo # 7 wrote:
If you want to build a wall on the Rio Grande, hey, go ahead. Just be prepared to work all day out in the orange and vegetable groves under the hot sun, that's all. Oh, and get paid barely enough to get by
Eh but the problem is indeed that those "dirty" jobs are paid poorly because the employers know they can save on labor costs since there's a blossoming market of cheap labor provided by the illegal immigrants.
Shut this market down and the employers will be reduced to pay higher to get ANYONE to work for them, including white Americans. Or: no oranges for you.
no. that's not true
we will get cheaper oranges and whatever from mexico and central america (and mushrooms from europe and africa) etc, only they will be much cheaper than they are now
ChrissMari wrote:
|| | ||| 6217|| 8 || 3 wrote:
Taboo # 7 wrote:
If you want to build a wall on the Rio Grande, hey, go ahead. Just be prepared to work all day out in the orange and vegetable groves under the hot sun, that's all. Oh, and get paid barely enough to get by
Eh but the problem is indeed that those "dirty" jobs are paid poorly because the employers know they can save on labor costs since there's a blossoming market of cheap labor provided by the illegal immigrants.
Shut this market down and the employers will be reduced to pay higher to get ANYONE to work for them, including white Americans. Or: no oranges for you.
no. that's not true
we will get cheaper oranges and whatever from mexico and central america (and mushrooms from europe and africa) etc, only they will be much cheaper than they are now
Well they shouldn't have cultivated the lands in the US in the first place then! A simple calculation: it'd be cheaper to get fruits Costa Rica. What's the point in all those Californian garden haciendas.
Also, why are you so sure they'll be cheaper from Mexico etc. These countries may boycot their exports into US. Or the US government may raise custom duties for Mexican imports to make it up for the domestic exploiters.
Anyway, I didn't talk particularly about field and garden jobs. I meant the principle of economics.
Hydrapelican wrote: I'm really sick of this BS wedge issue completely fabricated by Karl Rove and the republicans for their "get out the base" vote for 2006. This is exactly the same thing as the gay marriage fabricated wedge issue that was used in the 2004 campaign.
Why wasn't this a "crisis" 6 months ago? Why wasn't there proposed legislation a year ago...because it didn't have any benefit for Frist and the republican majority.
All those that are marching today are being USED and manipulated so that fox news and the local papers in Ohio, Pennsylvania, Tennessee etc can run stories about the mexican illegals "demanding more stuff" while "waving the mexican flag" and "singing the national anthem in spanish".
There will be no legislation about immigration because the republicans would never risk alienating the mexican american community...they are just using this to scare their white religious base into getting out and voting in november.
Also...this is a great way to keep the WAR in Iraq off the front page along with the stories about high gas prices.
Absolutely spot-on analysis there, Hydrapelican. ![]()
![]()
I've never been so proud of my hometown. ![]()
'Ceptin, of course, the time we ran Nixon out of town. ![]()
ChrissMari wrote:
Hydrapelican wrote: Hey Chris...no offence meant on any of the states themselves...I just mean that there are battleground states that the Republicans are trying to rally their base (and Pennsylvania is certainly a battleground state) in and they are using this issue du jour to whip up fear and anxiety in their base.
PA is not a battleground state
This cunt prolly thinks it's a red state...

Anyway, today was a day just like any other day. Nobody to clean my apartment, nobody to cook my meals... ![]()
Comrade Shampanyov, Gentleman wrote: Anyway, today was a day just like any other day. Nobody to clean my apartment, nobody to cook my meals...
No senoritas to drink your shampanyov with...![]()
Taboo # 7 wrote:
Comrade Shampanyov, Gentleman wrote: Anyway, today was a day just like any other day. Nobody to clean my apartment, nobody to cook my meals...
No senoritas to drink your shampanyov with...
Just like any other day... ![]()
Comrade Shampanyov, Gentleman wrote:
Taboo # 7 wrote:
Comrade Shampanyov, Gentleman wrote: Anyway, today was a day just like any other day. Nobody to clean my apartment, nobody to cook my meals...
No senoritas to drink your shampanyov with...
Just like any other day...
Why should it be any different, ha? ![]()
