(The Good Doctor) Martin Fradley wrote:
This is a New Order website. I know where my vote's going.
with uncle liam's?
71 replies · 1,371 views
(The Good Doctor) Martin Fradley wrote:
This is a New Order website. I know where my vote's going.
with uncle liam's?
I can forgive most of the nonsense that Noo Labour have been guilty of because I honestly believe that it was necessary in order to get elected.
In the UK system, there is simply no point having high principles while the people in power are making a total mess of things.
But it’s all going too far at the moment – traces of madness are creeping in. It’s time to ice-pick Blair and let someone fatter and more Scottish carry on the good work.
(Subject for next thread – now that Scotland has it’s own Parliament, should a Scot be running the UK?)
Diamond White wrote: I can forgive most of the nonsense that Noo Labour have been guilty of because I honestly believe that it was necessary in order to get elected.
In the UK system, there is simply no point having high principles while the people in power are making a total mess of things.
But it’s all going too far at the moment – traces of madness are creeping in. It’s time to ice-pick Blair and let someone fatter and more Scottish carry on the good work.
(Subject for next thread – now that Scotland has it’s own Parliament, should a Scot be running the UK?)
Brown certainly couldn't fcuk the public over like Blair has.
Diamond White wrote:
(Subject for next thread – now that Scotland has it’s own Parliament, should a Scot be running the UK?)
there already is, TB was born in Edinburgh...:D
redken wrote:
Diamond White wrote:
(Subject for next thread – now that Scotland has it’s own Parliament, should a Scot be running the UK?)
there already is, TB was born in Edinburgh...:D
gordon brown was born in glasgow and john reid was born in scotland (don't know where), as well.
Thank God that at last people are beginning to see through Blair and his smoke & mirrors & spin.
No more wars no more lies no more PFI no more foundation hospitals no more city acadamies no more ID cards no more taxes
Its time to vote Conservative.
Shug wrote:
Diamond White wrote: I can forgive most of the nonsense that Noo Labour have been guilty of because I honestly believe that it was necessary in order to get elected.
In the UK system, there is simply no point having high principles while the people in power are making a total mess of things.
But it’s all going too far at the moment – traces of madness are creeping in. It’s time to ice-pick Blair and let someone fatter and more Scottish carry on the good work.
(Subject for next thread – now that Scotland has it’s own Parliament, should a Scot be running the UK?)
Brown certainly couldn't fcuk the public over like Blair has.
That's true. He could probably eat us all, though.
AgentWood wrote:
(The Good Doctor) Martin Fradley wrote:
This is a New Order website. I know where my vote's going.
with uncle liam's?
It was more a reference to the "sell-out wankers" bit. I will happily drink beer with Liam; there is no way my cross is going in the same box as his.*
(* - On this note, I would warn all readers to avoid ANY "box" that Liam has been near
)
darran clarke wrote:
Its time to vote Conservative.
no its not![]()
see you in hell 'Call me Dave' Cameron![]()
AgentWood wrote:
FrogChorus wrote:
There are enough stupid people in this country who go out and vote Liberal, hence splitting the vote and letting the Tories in!
the israeli political system is the way of the future, where the purpose is to split the vote. 8000 parties vying for 10 seats, coalitions popping up everywhere: the ultra-orthodox jews aligning with the arab list, the communists making nice with likud. a) it's much more interesting, and b) it prevents one party from gaining too much power.
as far as the tories and labour are concerned, do you think there's that much of a difference anymore? (and i'm asking this as a serious question.) new labour is hardly the same party of clement attlee, nye bevin and tony benn.
Proportional representation. Wave of the future. Would definitely help un-fuck things in the States, as well.
darran clarke wrote: Thank God that at last people are beginning to see through Blair and his smoke & mirrors & spin.
No more wars no more lies no more PFI no more foundation hospitals no more city academies no more ID cards no more taxes
Its time to vote Conservative.
Surprised that no one else has picked up on this one.
You really think that voting Tory will stop wars? Like it didn't in '82, or '91.
And as for lies - you are joking, aren't you?
How old are you? Don't you remember the last Tory government? They were the biggest bunch of crooks in UK history.
Foundation hospitals and city academies are honest attempts to get funding back into health and education infrastructures without undue burden on the taxpayer. Why is it necessary? Because of the years of under spending and expensive restructuring by the Conservatives.
And don’t kid yourself into thinking that the ID cards will go away with the Labour Party.
And as for no more taxes? If by that you mean that the tax burden will be shifted from higher earners onto the lower paid, then you probably have a point.
It’s not time to vote Conservative at all. It’s time to know your history and stop repeating what you read in the Daily Mail without thinking about it.
Diamond White wrote: [ You really think that voting Tory will stop wars? Like it didn't in '82, or '91.
And as for lies - you are joking, aren't you?
How old are you? Don't you remember the last Tory government? They were the biggest bunch of crooks in UK history.
Foundation hospitals and city academies are honest attempts to get funding back into health and education infrastructures without undue burden on the taxpayer. Why is it necessary? Because of the years of under spending and expensive restructuring by the Conservatives.
And don’t kid yourself into thinking that the ID cards will go away with the Labour Party.
And as for no more taxes? If by that you mean that the tax burden will be shifted from higher earners onto the lower paid, then you probably have a point.
It’s not time to vote Conservative at all. It’s time to know your history and stop repeating what you read in the Daily Mail without thinking about it.
![]()
Daily Mail readers??? Thinking??!!??!!
Get real, Colin!!! I remember being on a train a few years back and a group of guys sitting behind me were reading stories to each other from various papers. After one left them all reeling with laughter, a voice goes: "That's what I love about the Mail. They hate EVERYONE"
Rarely a truer word spoken.
Which rag has the endless Princess Di fixation? ![]()
It's the Express I think, every other frigging headline by them is "Shocking New Evidence In Di Crash" or some such. Why report the actual news when you can roll out another pointless story about the "Queen Of Hearts"? It must be getting a joke by now, even to their suburban wifely readership.

(The Good Doctor) Martin Fradley wrote: Daily Mail readers??? Thinking??!!??!!
Get real, Colin!!!
It was the rudest thing I could think of saying - influenced by your good self (and Beckett, of course).
Ally's right - there's a bloke in this office who reads the Express and even he laughs about how full of nonsense it is.
Every other day there are new revelations of old big-nose.
S'pose it's better than some shit about which of the models and popstars of the day are in or out of vogue. Publicity for Diana doesn't really benefit anyone - the other 'news'papers are basically free advertising for crappy slebs.
I found the most touching tribute to Princess Diana on the internet recently - on the Private Eye website. What they did was reprinted articles by tabloid columnists just before she died, comparing them to work by the same writers immediately after her death.
(The Good Doctor) Martin Fradley wrote: Daily Mail readers??? Thinking??!!??!!
Get real, Colin!!! I remember being on a train a few years back and a group of guys sitting behind me were reading stories to each other from various papers. After one left them all reeling with laughter, a voice goes: "That's what I love about the Mail. They hate EVERYONE"
Rarely a truer word spoken.
I thought the Daily Mail was only read by birds?! ![]()
Diamond White wrote:
(The Good Doctor) Martin Fradley wrote: Daily Mail readers??? Thinking??!!??!!
Get real, Colin!!!
It was the rudest thing I could think of saying - influenced by your good self (and Beckett, of course).
Ally's right - there's a bloke in this office who reads the Express and even he laughs about how full of nonsense it is.
Every other day there are new revelations of old big-nose.
S'pose it's better than some shit about which of the models and popstars of the day are in or out of vogue. Publicity for Diana doesn't really benefit anyone - the other 'news'papers are basically free advertising for crappy slebs.
I found the most touching tribute to Princess Diana on the internet recently - on the Private Eye website. What they did was reprinted articles by tabloid columnists just before she died, comparing them to work by the same writers immediately after her death.
Its one of life's little mysteries as far as I'm concerned - why does anyone read the Daily Express?
I can understand why people read the Mail, much though I dislike the paper. It plays to the fear some folk have that someone somewhere might be getting away with something, or worse, enjoying themselves. Also the fact that a paper thats so misogyninstic and obsessed with policing women celebrities' weight is so widely read by women probably supports the old joke about 'what do men and women have in common? - They both hate women'. But at least one can say that what it does, it does well.
But the Express is surely just the Mail on a tuppence ha'penny budget and without the style? I remember a period around the time of the gulf war when they didn't have a single headline that was actually _true_ for two consecutive weeks (e.g. claiming that Saddam had used Scuds, when he hadn't, then claiming a journalist had been shot by Iraqis when it was Coalition troops, etc).
They seem to specialise in trying to terrify their readers (one blazing headline I remember was 'Britain to reintroduce rationing' - turned out to be some obscure government paper about disaster planning, the sort of thing HMG churns out routinely, saying that in the event of some highly unlikely disaster they might have food rationing - with no suggestion whatsoever it was actually likely)
Plus they are obsessed with Princess Di conspiracy theories.
If people want to read an angry right-wing lower middle class paper, why don't they at least opt for the better written one?
404 error wrote:
Diamond White wrote:
(The Good Doctor) Martin Fradley wrote: Daily Mail readers??? Thinking??!!??!!
Get real, Colin!!!
It was the rudest thing I could think of saying - influenced by your good self (and Beckett, of course).
Ally's right - there's a bloke in this office who reads the Express and even he laughs about how full of nonsense it is.
Every other day there are new revelations of old big-nose.
S'pose it's better than some shit about which of the models and popstars of the day are in or out of vogue. Publicity for Diana doesn't really benefit anyone - the other 'news'papers are basically free advertising for crappy slebs.
I found the most touching tribute to Princess Diana on the internet recently - on the Private Eye website. What they did was reprinted articles by tabloid columnists just before she died, comparing them to work by the same writers immediately after her death.
If people want to read an angry right-wing lower middle class rentboy........
.......read this forum for Uncle Liam's threads.
hmm.
Newspaper snobbery/loyalty is quite pathetic really.
Sometimes its nice just to look at a pair of tits.
El Jarvo wrote:
(The Good Doctor) Martin Fradley wrote: Daily Mail readers??? Thinking??!!??!!
Get real, Colin!!! I remember being on a train a few years back and a group of guys sitting behind me were reading stories to each other from various papers. After one left them all reeling with laughter, a voice goes: "That's what I love about the Mail. They hate EVERYONE"
Rarely a truer word spoken.
I thought the Daily Mail was only read by birds?!
you mean shat on by birds. it makes great cage lining.
Diamond White wrote:
darran clarke wrote: Thank God that at last people are beginning to see through Blair and his smoke & mirrors & spin.
No more wars no more lies no more PFI no more foundation hospitals no more city academies no more ID cards no more taxes
Its time to vote Conservative.
Surprised that no one else has picked up on this one.
You really think that voting Tory will stop wars? Like it didn't in '82, or '91.
And as for lies - you are joking, aren't you?
How old are you? Don't you remember the last Tory government? They were the biggest bunch of crooks in UK history.
Foundation hospitals and city academies are honest attempts to get funding back into health and education infrastructures without undue burden on the taxpayer. Why is it necessary? Because of the years of under spending and expensive restructuring by the Conservatives.
And don’t kid yourself into thinking that the ID cards will go away with the Labour Party.
And as for no more taxes? If by that you mean that the tax burden will be shifted from higher earners onto the lower paid, then you probably have a point.
It’s not time to vote Conservative at all. It’s time to know your history and stop repeating what you read in the Daily Mail without thinking about it.
I read the MEN on a Thursday, The Times on a Saturday and the Observer and Telegraph on a Sunday. I dont read the Mail. Im 38 and do remember the last Tory govnt. I particularly remember the fiscal policies that resulted in an economic revitalisation of the UK the results of which were bequeathed to Labour, which they have now totally pissed up against the wall resulting in hospitals sacking nurses, tax freedom day now later than it has ever been, and more laws passed than any other govnt. in history.