EdelBrock wrote:
Doctor Clayhead wrote:
There's a notorious set of speed cameras on a road just outside Stoke that gets set on fire every couple of months by like-minded sorts.

Now that I have no problem with!
Cameras I aggree with, but, not in tandem with speed limits devised when automotive engineering was VERy much more primitive.
Oh and hiding them is just low down and dirty and shows they have nothing to do with prevention and everything to do with making money.
The president of the FIA, Max Mosely ( son of Oswald mosely, British facist leader), has the excellent idea of variable speed limits....for instance, imagine a school by a main road....during the day you need people to creep along at 20 or 30, as there are kids around ( although what are we doing to Darwin by saving kids dumb enough to run into the road?)...but at 2am that limit should be maybe 100mph as it's a clear main road with no likelyhood of humans on foot.
He's also trying to bring an interesting thing into F1 based on research that's been done in germany (and also the USA independently).....when the cars are circulating behind a safety car, he wants them to go under automatic control, where they run nose to tail with a computer managing the speeds....I cannot see it happening in F1 for safety reasons ( the tyres would get far too cold and the first lap after the pace car pulled in would be the Somme on wheels)....BUT it could really work on motorways, cars travelling at 140mph bumper to bumper under CPU control. Of course a mechanical failure in one of the vehicles could cause problems, but these days, cars are little HAL9000's and would KNOw they were about to fail and could signal the other cars to let them out of the "train".
As for the letter bombs, I can assure you, there is so Gerry Adamski or Martin McGuinessovic around. The rest of Tim's assessment I'd buy though.