I'm not down with Obama, but..........

.....this kicks arse.

Hum. Shouldn't that sort of thing be aimed at the incumbent and his party?

This is what I find strange about American politics. If rival leaders attacked one another like that here, they'd get expelled from their party.

NOOLigan wrote: Hum. Shouldn't that sort of thing be aimed at the incumbent and his party?

This is what I find strange about American politics. If rival leaders attacked one another like that here, they'd get expelled from their party.

Oh, it's just the beginning my friend. I think the Democrat primaries are going to be blood bath.

Hillary is going to come to the sad realization that just because someone is FoB (Friend of Bill's), it does not mean that they will be FoH. Davis Geffen comes to mind......

Rightly so. The Dem-Primes are gonna be nothing short of insane. This'll make for something that I can, for the first time since the last national election, I can try to put my two cents in.

Of course, being the nutter that I am, don't be surprised if I post a pic of me surviving said insanity. Blood baths. Nice.

Uh...

NOOLigan wrote: Hum. Shouldn't that sort of thing be aimed at the incumbent and his party?

This is what I find strange about American politics. If rival leaders attacked one another like that here, they'd get expelled from their party.

Its a shame our politics have taken this course. I guess it can be traced to Alexander Hamilton bashing Thomas Jefferson in his newspaper back in the late 1700s.

Unfortunately, the Democrates haven't figured out that US does not like this sort of politics, as I think it was this exact tactic that made them loose the presidential election in 2004.

Hillary is the leader of a totalitarian police state spouting vague platitudes... i don't get it, any face would be equally effective or uneffective. Yeah, they should be bashing Dick and Dubya.

probably just some kid did it, thinks he's kewl

EdelBrock wrote:

NOOLigan wrote: Hum. Shouldn't that sort of thing be aimed at the incumbent and his party?

This is what I find strange about American politics. If rival leaders attacked one another like that here, they'd get expelled from their party.

Its a shame our politics have taken this course. I guess it can be traced to Alexander Hamilton bashing Thomas Jefferson in his newspaper back in the late 1700s.

Unfortunately, the Democrates haven't figured out that US does not like this sort of politics, as I think it was this exact tactic that made them loose the presidential election in 2004.

Of course, you'd have to totally ignore the 2004 Republican tactics-- for example, the orchestrated smear campaign against Kerry, not to mention the election "iregularities" in Ohio-- to say that with a straight face...

Comrade Shampanyov wrote:

EdelBrock wrote:

NOOLigan wrote: Hum. Shouldn't that sort of thing be aimed at the incumbent and his party?

This is what I find strange about American politics. If rival leaders attacked one another like that here, they'd get expelled from their party.

Its a shame our politics have taken this course. I guess it can be traced to Alexander Hamilton bashing Thomas Jefferson in his newspaper back in the late 1700s.

Unfortunately, the Democrates haven't figured out that US does not like this sort of politics, as I think it was this exact tactic that made them loose the presidential election in 2004.

Of course, you'd have to totally ignore the 2004 Republican tactics-- for example, the orchestrated smear campaign against Kerry, not to mention the election "iregularities" in Ohio-- to say that with a straight face...

I'm mentioning the tactics that have been the noted tactics of the Dem party by analysts on both conservative and liberal news shows. Basically the "smear" campaigns have been mentioned directly from the candidates.

The Riverboat "scandal" was not by the Repub party directly, though it is possible it was indirectly controled by them.

The Dems need to stop the direct smearing as a campaign tactic as the "hate-for-Bush" caravan can only take them so far......and it seems that they are putting all thier eggs in that basket.

I'm a card-carrying Democrat now, something I was not for the '04 election.

I'm down for a Dem in '08, as long as it's NOT Hilary. She's the worst fucking example of a turn-coat lefty...a sheep who was herded into voting for Operation Enduring Insanity only to change her mind when it became politically viable.

Sheds on a Plane wrote: I'm a card-carrying Democrat now, something I was not for the '04 election.

I'm down for a Dem in '08, as long as it's NOT Hilary. She's the worst fucking example of a turn-coat lefty...a sheep who was herded into voting for Operation Enduring Insanity only to change her mind when it became politically viable.

She's a diehard politician in the worst way, more so than Obama. Too much a part of THE SYSTEM. The only good thing about her getting elected would be having Bill back in the White House to get involved. After all, he can't just sit back and get blowjobs for 4 years, can he? Anyone...?

Quite honestly what is the love for Obama other than the media seems to love him. What has he done? What does he stand for? It seems to me anytime he states anything, it is vague comments that really don't state anything, but just sound what the masses want to hear. Or is it simply that he's the opposite party of Bush, black with a muslim name, and too young to have too much trash behind him?