These posters have been causing me real problems on the London Underground all this week.
I mean, based on this evidence alone, you'd have to, wouldn't you? 
Dates
· UTC
Kelly Osbourne
Archived20 replies · 593 views
This is an archived legacy thread. Replies are closed, but the discussion is preserved.
← Back to Behind Closed Doors
21 posts
She looks too much like that Kelly Osbourne.
There was a picture of her in a newspaper I saw yesterday.
She doesn't improve with a drink in her 
El Jarvo wrote:
I mean, based on this evidence alone, you'd have to, wouldn't you?
I would have to what???
ally wrote:
That's better...
You'd never believe that was the same bird as the photo Al posted... Paint Shop Pro indeed...
Snorri xxx
El Jarvo wrote: These posters have been causing me real problems on the London Underground all this week.
I mean, based on this evidence alone, you'd have to, wouldn't you?
No Fuckin way that is Kelly!!! Photoshop to the rescue
I mean my first thought was "that chick is too HOT to be Kelly Osbourne" I thought it was a reject from "Chicago" or something....
LeggyD wrote: Another good reason not to travel on the tube
LeggyD: lightening his workload one passenger at a time!
BIGINOIL wrote:
LeggyD wrote: Another good reason not to travel on the tube
LeggyD: lightening his workload one passenger at a time!
I'd have thought the best reason to avoid the tube would be knowing that Dave worked on the safety systems ;)
People who do not know Mr Jarvis should be aware that this kind of lustful post concerning a certain 'type' of lady is very much in keeping with the usual libidinous terrain of the Jarvisesque.
Doctor Clayhead wrote: People who do not know Mr Jarvis should be aware that this kind of lustful post concerning a certain 'type' of lady is very much in keeping with the usual libidinous terrain of the Jarvisesque.
He wanted to marry this lass, not so long ago
Doctor Clayhead wrote: People who do not know Mr Jarvis should be aware that this kind of lustful post concerning a certain 'type' of lady is very much in keeping with the usual libidinous terrain of the Jarvisesque.
So, he like's 'em airbrushed then?
Hang on, isn't she a stumpy fucker? Thought Al went for chicks so tall they need anto colision beacons on their bonces?
Doctor? wrote:
Doctor Clayhead wrote: People who do not know Mr Jarvis should be aware that this kind of lustful post concerning a certain 'type' of lady is very much in keeping with the usual libidinous terrain of the Jarvisesque.
So, he like's 'em airbrushed then?
Hang on, isn't she a stumpy fucker? Thought Al went for chicks so tall they need anto colision beacons on their bonces?
Just stick a ludicrous pair of high heels on.. works every time.. well with the height issue anyway..
BIGINOIL wrote:
LeggyD wrote: Another good reason not to travel on the tube
LeggyD: lightening his workload one passenger at a time!
lol.
Passengers are alright though.
It's the drivers and signalmen who are a pain in the arse 
Burt Reynolds wrote:
Doctor Clayhead wrote: People who do not know Mr Jarvis should be aware that this kind of lustful post concerning a certain 'type' of lady is very much in keeping with the usual libidinous terrain of the Jarvisesque.
He wanted to marry this lass, not so long ago
Which one?
