Lennon or McCartney?

I assume most of us love, or at least respect both of them. But who do you like more? (only one)

I have all the respect for Sir Paul McCartney, but Lennon is GOD!

Maybe McCartney is a Demi-God.

Indeed!

Ringo Star!

Thomas The Tank Engine legend!

I'm not a lover of the Beatles but as I like some of Lennon's solo stuff I've voted for him. Where is George Harrison on the list? (I've got my mind set on you!)

Oh and Ringo Starr wants stoning for his 'musical' contribution to the Liverpool City of Culture

I voted Lennon because hes dead

not a fan, but I voted Lennon. I do like Imagine

I voted Phil Spector cause my friend lived across the street from where he murdered his girlfriend. My friend couldn't leave his house for a couple weeks cause the Press were swarming outside like flies on a dead cow....

Beatles were shit, Lennon and McCartney both blow great big donkey dicks in the sky full of diamonds

i like them both actually, but I could see why chapman thought lennon was a phony.

however,My favorite by a country mile was georgie.

The Sub-Cultured Perfect Kisser*!* wrote: I assume most of us love, or at least respect both of them. But who do you like more? (only one)

I have all the respect for Sir Paul McCartney, but Lennon is GOD!

Maybe McCartney is a Demi-God.

Indeed!

Can you FUCK OFF with this SHITE.

I see the change of scenery is doing you a world of good Li

Ive got two John Lennon books that im getting rid of,

if anybody wants them....

i went for macca, and what do you know, in the minority again.by 7 to 1

lennon

John Lennon

I don't know why you, British, hate the Beatles, they're yours!! I love the Beatles, I can't help it - it's the first pop music I have listened to for years, so I can't change my past and my sonic memory. But pleaseeee, don't consider me a hippy who wears flowers and takes LCD or proclaims a new age of love.

Now it should be Lennon, at least he's interesting at interviews, to the point always. McCartney is more accesible in terms of music and that's it about him.

Jeffari-al-Texani wrote:

|| | ||| 6217|| 8 || 3 wrote: I don't know why you, British, hate the Beatles, they're yours!! I love the Beatles, I can't help it - it's the first pop music I have listened to for years, so I can't change my past and my sonic memory. But pleaseeee, don't consider me a hippy who wears flowers and takes LCD or proclaims a new age of love.

Now it should be Lennon, at least he's interesting at interviews, to the point always. McCartney is more accesible in terms of music and that's it about him.

Ian...it's LSD that one takes...not LCD...that's a soundsystem!!!

WHOOOOO

aw that's right, Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds

Jeffari-al-Texani wrote:

|| | ||| 6217|| 8 || 3 wrote: I don't know why you, British, hate the Beatles, they're yours!! I love the Beatles, I can't help it - it's the first pop music I have listened to for years, so I can't change my past and my sonic memory. But pleaseeee, don't consider me a hippy who wears flowers and takes LCD or proclaims a new age of love.

Now it should be Lennon, at least he's interesting at interviews, to the point always. McCartney is more accesible in terms of music and that's it about him.

Ian...it's LSD that one takes...not LCD...that's a soundsystem!!!

WHOOOOO

... but he likes LSD Soundsystem. ;)

Jeffari-al-Texani wrote:

|| | ||| 6217|| 8 || 3 wrote: I don't know why you, British, hate the Beatles, they're yours!! I love the Beatles, I can't help it - it's the first pop music I have listened to for years, so I can't change my past and my sonic memory. But pleaseeee, don't consider me a hippy who wears flowers and takes LCD or proclaims a new age of love.

Now it should be Lennon, at least he's interesting at interviews, to the point always. McCartney is more accesible in terms of music and that's it about him.

Ian...it's LSD that one takes...not LCD...that's a soundsystem!!!

WHOOOOO

In Soviet Union, LSD takes you.

LENNON FOR EVER

|| | ||| 6217|| 8 || 3 wrote: I don't know why you, British, hate the Beatles, they're yours!

I don't hate them, they just never did it for me. I would suspect I'm in the minority over here though, I think most people love the Beatles (or pretend to because they feel they should )

Lennon, every time. Stupid question.

Marvin

Burty

Most people I know have a nodding respect for them. The only person I know who really rates them is my Dad.

It's Dad music

John Lennon was a rocker to the core. Paul McCartney is a whore.

Anyone could have written great songs with John Lennon.

Face the facts. Lennon went on to write some of the best songs ever written without McCartney. Waching the Wheels go Round, Woman, How do you Sleep, Imagine...

Mull of Kin fucking tire and the Frog Song. What a tart. And Ebony and Ivory? He couldn't even rock when sitting on the same chair of one of the fathers of funk.

McCartney is a penis. I shit him.

And another thing. There's no such thing as a Lennon and McCartney song. They never wrote together, just added ideas to one another's songs at a late stage.

As a rule of thumb if it's any good it's a Lennon tune. If it's shit, it's McCartney. And if it's Something, it's by George Harrison.

They fucked it when they recorded Yellow Submarine.

i love the beatles. mmmmmmmmmm. the beatles.

Aaron Lennon has some potential, definitely. Great pace. George McCartney's just a journeyman fullback though. Average premiership pro, nothing more.

I think this piece of footage illustrates how much of a cunt Mccartney is: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1opt82xmnSk

And another thing. Why is there always this kneejerk response whereby Mccartney or Beatles material is always considered timeless and anything synthetic from the 80's is always branded as dated and no longer relevant?