Hmmm...doggy style...literally...
Archived19 replies · 720 views
Thanks for that. Tonights meal of bangers'n'mash is now postponed !!
WRONG WRONG WRONG.
woof woof
Aren't there just a few things funny in that article...
1 - She did 'crimes against nature' (yeah for animal rights!).... but they're gonna put the three dogs down
Not only that, why put the dogs down? cause they have the thirst for human piss flap and will go on a rape and pillaging spree?
2 - One of the dogs were a 'mixed breed'.... not one of her own surely?
3 - Nice that her son found the tapes... that's a shocker I could do without... and if you found tapes of yer mum doing the dity deed, would your first course of action be to call the sheriff?
EdelBrock wrote: Aren't there just a few things funny in that article...
1 - She did 'crimes against nature' (yeah for animal rights!).... but they're gonna put the three dogs down
2 - One of the dogs were a 'mixed breed'.... not one of her own surely?
3 - Nice that her son found the tapes... that's a shocker I could do without... and if you found tapes of yer mum doing the dity deed, would your first course of action be to call the sheriff?
If you found your mum doing then dirty deed you'd hope that it wasn't with a fucking poodle !!
it is illegal to film a dog fucking a woman? a 50 year old woman? were they hurting the dogs?
seriously they must have nothing better to do in Oklahoma, sex wise or police wise.
0_o wrote: it is illegal to film a dog fucking a woman? a 50 year old woman? were they hurting the dogs?
seriously they must have nothing better to do in Oklahoma, sex wise or police wise.
American, so free it has sex police.
His Holiness, The Pope wrote:
Doctor? wrote:
0_o wrote: it is illegal to film a dog fucking a woman? a 50 year old woman? were they hurting the dogs?
seriously they must have nothing better to do in Oklahoma, sex wise or police wise.
American, so free it has sex police.
Of course, but then we don't spend our every waking moment telling everyone else, and especially ourselves, that we live in the most wonderfully free utopia.
Doctor? wrote:
His Holiness, The Pope wrote:
Doctor? wrote:
0_o wrote: it is illegal to film a dog fucking a woman? a 50 year old woman? were they hurting the dogs?
seriously they must have nothing better to do in Oklahoma, sex wise or police wise.
American, so free it has sex police.
Of course, but then we don't spend our every waking moment telling everyone else, and especially ourselves, that we live in the most wonderfully free utopia.
Well that's because ya don't!.....
...duh!
Doctor? wrote:
His Holiness, The Pope wrote:
Doctor? wrote:
0_o wrote: it is illegal to film a dog fucking a woman? a 50 year old woman? were they hurting the dogs?
seriously they must have nothing better to do in Oklahoma, sex wise or police wise.
American, so free it has sex police.
Of course, but then we don't spend our every waking moment telling everyone else, and especially ourselves, that we live in the most wonderfully free utopia.
The only people who believe that Americanist rhetoric are the same ones who live in Oklahoma and fuck dogs.
Maybe they were rednecks?????
For some reason, Marquis de Sade's novels don't offend me, but this does.
I'm pretty tolerant about human sexuality---but beastiality? Absolutely disgusting. :(
Jeffari-al-Texani wrote: She's a SUPERFREAK
Yeah but have you seen her? I wouldn't touch her with YOUR dog!! :bag:
Which reminds me of another part of the Re:Order night. Waiting for Monty's mate, so he took us round to his house to say hello to Julie. We also met the cat (well behaved) and the dog (far from it).
All except one got at least 3 attempted leg shags.
Which was nice.
naughty monty, down boy!!