EdelBrock wrote: What the hell... not anyone on here would still bang her? First VP candidate with hot legs
Something chilling and sickly about her, looks like she'll soon be a GYLF edel!
Dates
· UTC
Hottie for VP
Archived78 replies · 2,367 views
This is an archived legacy thread. Replies are closed, but the discussion is preserved.
← Back to Behind Closed Doors
Showing posts 31–60 of 79
↑ First post
Latest post ↓
So know one here is into the hot librarian look huh? and no one here finds 40 year old women attractive? 
Can't find any good photos of her on google, but at her VP acceptance speech she was looking pretty good...
EdelBrock wrote: no one here finds 40 year old women attractive?
You're confused about why nobody is drooling for a chance to give her one. It's not for lack of sexy librarian fantasies, and it's not her age....
36 and hot: 
39 and hot: 
43 and hot: 
46 and hot: 
54 and hot: 
44 and NO BUYS: 
Comrade Shampanyov wrote:
EdelBrock wrote: Fine, then I don't have to share
Nor do I...
Damn RIGHT! Keep yer HANDS to yerself!
EdelBrock wrote: McCain made a nice choice on Palin, she's a maverick and a hottie to boot
ewww, uuuuuuugly! 
:barf: :barf: :barf:
Comrade Shampanyov wrote:
EdelBrock wrote: no one here finds 40 year old women attractive?
You're confused about why nobody is drooling for a chance to give her one. It's not for lack of sexy librarian fantasies, and it's not her age....
36 and hot:
now, she's hot! 
Don't know about the Sarah Palin, but someone obviously thought her 17 year old daughter was hot enough...
Her inner ugliness just rips out of her. She's had extensive plastic surgery, wears lots of makeup and sees her own family as career props. The photos of her sitting proudly on a dead bear just sum her up.
She's a cunt. Good luck with her.
LeggyD wrote: Don't know about the Sarah Palin, but someone obviously thought her 17 year old daughter was hot enough...
Yes that doesnt sit well with her conservative agenda. Anyone that parades their unmarried pregnant teenage daughter on national television is clearly a skank.
Hottie? Must have a different meaning in the great US. Here in England is means someone whos fit, stunning and sexy.
This grandma is none of those 3!
NO Regret wrote: Hottie? Must have a different meaning in the great US. Here in England is means someone whos fit, stunning and sexy.
This grandma is none of those 3!
I noticed you didn't mention straight, white teeth. :D :D :D
How old is this woman? I've not seen her age quoted in any of the reports about her over the past couple of days.
She seems like a maniac though.
Never trust anyone who values success more than principles or talent or knowledge or fun. Write that down in your book of things to remember.
It's on the front page of mine.
Tex wrote:
NO Regret wrote: Hottie? Must have a different meaning in the great US. Here in England is means someone whos fit, stunning and sexy.
This grandma is none of those 3!
I noticed you didn't mention straight, white teeth. :D :D :D
Do you know why so many people in Britain dont have white teeth (like 100% of Yanks do)?
Its because they have bluetooth!!
Colin is quite right. She is clearly a lunatic.
Does VP stand for Visible Pants or Vaginal Pong, btw?
Palin is likeable and gives good speech. When McCain dies next year she will make an interesting president. I think they made all the other speeches really suck so she would look good. The Republicans are so obsessed with that Rush Limbaugh type of fascist pompous smirking asshole-ism, everybody talks like that now, utterly repulsive. Rudy, what a douche bag, no wonder nobody voted for him.
Just saw an ad, says Republicans are for a balanced budget, and say somebody with experience is only qualified to be president... these same Republicans didn't seem to mind George Bush being/doing the opposite. They did find an excuse to keep Bush from the convention thou, lucky that they got a hurricane
0_o wrote: Republicans ... say somebody with experience is only qualified to be president... these same Republicans didn't seem to mind George Bush being/doing the opposite.
Exactly.
0_o wrote: Republicans are for a balanced budget
Is that why W spent us into bankruptcy, and postponed the bill's due date until after he leaves office?
Bullshit must taste good, Republicans never seem to tire of it. 
0_o wrote: Palin is likeable and gives good speech. When McCain dies next year she will make an interesting president. I think they made all the other speeches really suck so she would look good. The Republicans are so obsessed with that Rush Limbaugh type of fascist pompous smirking asshole-ism, everybody talks like that now, utterly repulsive. Rudy, what a douche bag, no wonder nobody voted for him.
Just saw an ad, says Republicans are for a balanced budget, and say somebody with experience is only qualified to be president... these same Republicans didn't seem to mind George Bush being/doing the opposite. They did find an excuse to keep Bush from the convention thou, lucky that they got a hurricane
I gained alot of respect for you by this. I think you are the first (on the left) on this board to have the ability to see a strength within the opposing party (even is if it was a setup for your following comments). Too many on this board can't actually admit to any weaknesses within thier own party and only spew rhetoric from thier party and defend it at all costs.
You are damn right on the hurricane, it did help keep from a sticky situation....
It's always reassuring when, under the guise of "patriotism," a candidate for the job "a heartbeat away from the President" expresses her contempt for 700 years of Anglo-American jurisprudence and the Constitution she will swear to uphold.
Wow, what a patriot.
Comrade Shampanyov wrote: It's always reassuring when, under the guise of "patriotism," a candidate for the job "a heartbeat away from the President" expresses her contempt for 700 years of Anglo-American jurisprudence and the Constitution she will swear to uphold.
Wow, what a patriot.
hmmmm.... can't the same arguement be used agaist Obama???
EdelBrock wrote:
Comrade Shampanyov wrote: It's always reassuring when, under the guise of "patriotism," a candidate for the job "a heartbeat away from the President" expresses her contempt for 700 years of Anglo-American jurisprudence and the Constitution she will swear to uphold.
Wow, what a patriot.
hmmmm.... can't the same arguement be used agaist Obama???
That he expressed contempt for 700 years of Anglo-American jurisprudence and the Constitution he will swear to uphold?
No, it can't.
Comrade Shampanyov wrote:
EdelBrock wrote:
Comrade Shampanyov wrote: It's always reassuring when, under the guise of "patriotism," a candidate for the job "a heartbeat away from the President" expresses her contempt for 700 years of Anglo-American jurisprudence and the Constitution she will swear to uphold.
Wow, what a patriot.
hmmmm.... can't the same arguement be used agaist Obama???
That he expressed contempt for 700 years of Anglo-American jurisprudence and the Constitution he will swear to uphold?
No, it can't.
see the other thread, be unbiased for once, you have time to argue one thing, but not another.... politicians are politicians, each has thier strengths and weaknesses, that you can't admit to your own candidate's weakness only shows you are caught in thier rhetoric, all stary-eyed...
EdelBrock wrote:
Comrade Shampanyov wrote:
EdelBrock wrote:
Comrade Shampanyov wrote: It's always reassuring when, under the guise of "patriotism," a candidate for the job "a heartbeat away from the President" expresses her contempt for 700 years of Anglo-American jurisprudence and the Constitution she will swear to uphold.
Wow, what a patriot.
hmmmm.... can't the same arguement be used agaist Obama???
That he expressed contempt for 700 years of Anglo-American jurisprudence and the Constitution he will swear to uphold?
No, it can't.
see the other thread, be unbiased for once, you have time to argue one thing, but not another.... politicians are politicians, each has thier strengths and weaknesses, that you can't admit to your own candidate's weakness only shows you are caught in thier rhetoric, all stary-eyed...
Edel, you are the one who said "can't the same argument be used against Obama?" If you think it can be made, make your case, instead of changing the subject.
