Skip to content

Hilarious Oasis Review

Archived

13 replies · 513 views

This is an archived legacy thread. Replies are closed, but the discussion is preserved.

The music world needs Oasis at this moment, a band with more personality and more amusing quips than any British band for at least 10 years. Throughout their history Oasis have captured the pop zeitgeist (and my personal zeitgeist) as a band that combine the best elements of the Beatles and Sex Pistols to emerge as this generation's Rolling Stones.

Alan McGee (yes folks, the man who discovered Oasis) gives his impartial and honest review of their new record in the Guardian. Worth reading both for his ridiculous comparison between this, Oasis' seventh album and the Stones and the Beatles seventh outings - Beggars Banquet and Revolver respectively. I've not heard it, but I'm prepared to bet that the Dig Out Your Soul is not "on a par of with both in terms of classic songwriting" at all, whatever your definition of classic songwriting. It's also worth reading the Guardian readers responses below the piece. They really are a caustic bunch.

I respect Alan McGee and I have a lot of time for Oasis too. But this is utter fucking bollocks of the highest order and well worth a read.

More Cocaine, Anyone?

0 likes

1st two albume= Great, the rest Sliiiiiiiiiiides Awaaaaaay.

0 likes

DigitalWaters wrote: 1st two albume= Great, the rest Sliiiiiiiiiiides Awaaaaaay.

Pffff. More like: great first single, great attitude (for about 5 minutes); the rest: simply proves that they were always aimless one-trick ponies.

:shrug:

0 likes

Ponyboy wrote:

The music world needs Oasis at this moment, a band with more personality and more amusing quips than any British band for at least 10 years. Throughout their history Oasis have captured the pop zeitgeist (and my personal zeitgeist) as a band that combine the best elements of the Beatles and Sex Pistols to emerge as this generation's Rolling Stones.

Alan McGee (yes folks, the man who discovered Oasis) gives his impartial and honest review of their new record in the Guardian. Worth reading both for his ridiculous comparison between this, Oasis' seventh album and the Stones and the Beatles seventh outings - Beggars Banquet and Revolver respectively. I've not heard it, but I'm prepared to bet that the Dig Out Your Soul is not "on a par of with both in terms of classic songwriting" at all, whatever your definition of classic songwriting. It's also worth reading the Guardian readers responses below the piece. They really are a caustic bunch.

I respect Alan McGee and I have a lot of time for Oasis too. But this is utter fucking bollocks of the highest order and well worth a read.

More Cocaine, Anyone?

He must have meant that's where most of the material on the new album came from.

0 likes

The new album is great, downloaded it last week along with the Kings Of Leon album. Gotta admit I was surprised - cos the Oasis one is a lot better IMO.

0 likes

oasis records. there's your proof that god doesn't exist, doc.

0 likes

Ponyboy wrote: It's also worth reading the Guardian readers responses below the piece. They really are a caustic bunch.

Thoroughly enjoyed reading the comments.Superb.And amongst many views i agreed with this one is probably tops

The only great band on Creation was The House of Love,

:nod:

0 likes

ShugZV wrote: The new album is great, downloaded it last week along with the Kings Of Leon album. Gotta admit I was surprised - cos the Oasis one is a lot better IMO.

oh shug.

:nonono:

0 likes

hibster wrote:

ShugZV wrote: The new album is great, downloaded it last week along with the Kings Of Leon album. Gotta admit I was surprised - cos the Oasis one is a lot better IMO.

oh shug.

:nonono:

After that shitey joke you sent the other day you should be banned from using that smilie :nod:

0 likes

Discoring: rock electronico wrote: Too much airplay in provincial downmarket pubs over the years has rendered them tiresome.

:eek3:

I only drink in provincial downmarket pubs.

0 likes

Got to admit I find their music boring as fcuk but to be fair Noel can be quite funny in the press winding up the self-righteous musos who more than deserve a verbal kicking (Mark Ronson, Amy Winehouse etc).

Oasis is this generation's U2 really; not so much a band but a board of directors almost. The old Album-Tour-Album-Tour treadmill which you could kind of forgive them for if they at least tried to do something new with the tunes but they never do. As much as I loathe U2 at least with that Pop album from '97 they tried to change their sound a bit.

I tuned out around Be Here Now... how many albums have they done since then!?

I had a mate at uni who was well into Oasis but even he admitted the later recorded output was bilge... he was only into it for the gigs and festival appearances.

0 likes

A Much More Balanced View From The Same Newspaper

Had me laughing out loud earlier

Rock review: Oasis, Dig Out Your Soul (Big Brother) 3 out of 5

\* Alexis Petridis

Neither masterpiece nor catastrophe.

It's hard not to be impressed with the way Noel Gallagher has managed to turn Oasis' apparently permanent state of musical stasis into a matter of class pride. "It's a working-class thing ... I'm not an experimenter," he recently remarked, as if making interesting music was an unacceptable capitulation to bourgeois mores, like joining a snooty golf club.

It's a smart bit of doublethink, but there's something depressing about this not-for-the-likes-of-us attitude, not least the sneaking feeling that Noel Gallagher - clearly a sharp and intelligent man - doesn't believe a word of it, that it's bluster designed to hide fear, the knowledge that the one time he did try to experiment, the result was Oasis's catastrophic 2000 album Standing on the Shoulder of Giants. The millions of records and tickets Oasis sell must come as consolation, but you wonder if Gallagher occasionally steals a rueful glance at his former Battle of Britpop nemesis - wistfully noting, say, the critically acclaimed Mandarin opera - before going back to dutifully promoting the new Oasis album with a single that goes "love is a litany, a magical mystery" and assurances to the press that it sounds like the Beatles.

At least he can console himself that he's never going to get sued under the Trade Descriptions Act: Oasis's seventh album arrives bearing Helter Skelter drum fills, a sample from John Lennon's final radio interview, a coda to The Turning stolen from Dear Prudence and lyrical references to Lennon's Gimme Some Truth and Ian MacDonald's Fabs book Revolution in the Head. Complaining about Oasis's lyrics seems rather like shooting fish in a barrel, or as Gallagher would doubtless have it, shooting fish in a barrel/ with a man called Darryl/ singing a carol/ in American Apparel. Suffice to say there's a chorus that advises you to "shake your reptile" - Crocodile? Snake? Tortoise? - and that the younger Gallagher brother has developed a weird tic of continually reminding you that you're listening to a song, as if concerned you might think you're listening to a lecture on particle physics: "Here's a song," he offers on both I'm Outta Time and Ain't Got Nothin'.

That said, both are among the album's highlights, the former an effective exercise in shamelessly button-pushing balladry, the latter a two-minute brawl of a song, driven by an off-kilter drum pattern. It's one of a handful of moments when Dig Out Your Soul works because it does precisely what Noel Gallagher says it doesn't and experiments, at least a little, with the Oasis formula. The opening Bag It Up offers an impressively grimy, low-rent brand of freakbeat, while Falling Down is, by Oasis's standards at least, opaque and oddly delicate.

Nevertheless, the other Liam contribution, Soldier On, highlights Dig Out Your Soul's biggest problem: the mid-tempo plod that has become Oasis's default rhythmic setting. There's something trudging and weary about it, redolent of gritted teeth and furrowed brows, of labour rather than effortless inspiration. It's further compounded by a surfeit of lyrical references to having a go, sticking with it and not giving up - "You've got to keep on keeping on", "My head's in the clouds but at least I'm trying" - and by the straining mannerisms of Liam's vocals, which at their most affected sound less like bracingly abrasive sneering than the dogged exertions of a man who's a little backed up.

Oasis can still occasionally produce songs suggestive of the breezy insouciance that marked their early years - the new single The Shock of the Lightning among them - but more often on Dig Out Your Soul, they sound as though they're killing themselves trying to come up with something that'll do. And sometimes what they come up with won't do at all, as on Gem Archer's To Be Where There's Life, a song that signifies its mystical, psychedelic bent by opening with a sitar going sprrrrrroinnnnng. It's the kind of hackneyed gesture that seems to underline Oasis's reductive view of music, the nagging suspicion that, far from being steeped in the nuances of classic rock, they've only actually heard the Greatest Hits.

For more than a decade, Oasis have continued to sell millions of records while stuck in a musical holding pattern. It's a perversely impressive feat, partly down to their fans, who, depending on your perspective, are either remarkably loyal or risibly undemanding. But it's also down to Oasis' willingness to graft, dutifully touring, never declining to play the hits. Neither masterpiece nor catastrophe, more experimental than Noel would allow but no one's idea of adventurous, a lot of Dig Out Your Soul sounds like hard work, and not in the latter-day Scott Walker sense of unorthodox or avant garde. Perhaps that's fitting.

0 likes

You're leaving NewOrderOnline

This link goes to an external website we don't operate, which has its own privacy policy and terms.

Destination:
Continue ↗