Skip to content

Just how fucked is this Obama chap then?

Archived

71 replies · 1,759 views

This is an archived legacy thread. Replies are closed, but the discussion is preserved.

OK, so everyone's happy that the illiterate godtard is out of the whitehouse, that's fair enough.....but have you seen the amount of sheer WORSHIP that's going on over there? FFS even cuntface sang for him!!

SO, in a couple of weeks when it dawns on Jesusland that their ecconomy is still fucked, their troops are still killing and being killed in all sorts of places they've no business being, and that their freedoms are still non-existent under Shrub's laws (which $40 says Obama will leave in place)..........what's gonna happen? Riots? Wild backlash?

Although I tend to subsribe to the "dead quite soon" school....some crazy who actually believes the stuff shrub's spastics were saying about him during the election will kill him. Or just someone who can't comprehend democracy and therefor can't see why there should be a N* in charge of "his" country.

Still at least this one can read the funny black symbols in between the pictures.

0 likes

I thought this thread was gonna be about U2 playing his inaugaration ceremony? :uhoh:

0 likes

I've said it before and I'll say it again: Obama thus far is shaping up to be nigger Blair.

I hope he proves otherwise, but this had serious shades of the UK in 1997 all over again. Only with more razzmatazz, obv.

0 likes

In my opinion, he, they are pushing too far.

  1. Never forget that the Americans voted for a President of the USA and nothing else. The rest of the world can be ready to be considered a bit little more than with W, but no more - see how he had so little to say about Gaza, this Obama... A President of the USA, black or white, remains a President of the USA. That is my point.
  2. With all the mess W left, I wish good luck to the man... People expect too much of him and I doubt there will be a "happy ending" of the mandate.

I sincerely hope that, in four years, we will have something else to say that Obama was the first black American President.

0 likes

As far as I'm concerned, we got the first hip-hopper in da house. He'll prorably party away all these 4 years and leave the White House completely unrestorable, with Puff Daddy carpets and discoballs permanently mounted in the bathrooms.

0 likes

|| | ||| 6217|| 8 || 3 wrote: As far as I'm concerned, we got the first hip-hopper in da house. He'll prorably party away all these 4 years and leave the White House completely unrestorable, with Puff Daddy carpets and discoballs permanently mounted in the bathrooms.

problematic at best....

0 likes

I'll give him an honest chance before saying anything negative towards him.

One thing that is disturbing to me is all the hoopla people make about it being a "historic" event. Granted it might be, but it doen't warrant all this coverage that just drags on and on about this point. I mean not one person can just say "inaugeration" everyone HAS to say "historic" before it. It goes to show how hypocritical people are, they say "I don't see color, I only see the man", but yet they drag on and on about him being "the first black president"... but he's an acceptable black, its not like they voted in Kool-Moe-Dee in the office

I just can't wait for the inaugeration to be over with so people can stop all this incessent jiberish.

*and Jiphy, its not like the French government is one to take example of, considering they go behind and against UN sanctions and decisions all the time, only concerned of thier own personal gain...

0 likes

PETER COATES'S BELATED REDEMPTION wrote: I've said it before and I'll say it again: Obama thus far is shaping up to be nigger Blair.

I hope he proves otherwise, but this had serious shades of the UK in 1997 all over again. Only with more razzmatazz, obv.

How so? I really don't know much about Blair. How is his case and Obama's similar?

0 likes

Doctor? wrote: SO, in a couple of weeks when it dawns on Jesusland that their ecconomy is still fucked, their troops are still killing and being killed in all sorts of places they've no business being, and that their freedoms are still non-existent under Shrub's laws (which $40 says Obama will leave in place)..........what's gonna happen? Riots? Wild backlash?

Nope.

0 likes

Doctor? wrote: OK, so everyone's happy that the illiterate godtard is out of the whitehouse

Not me...he's moving back to Dallas...why can't he just retire to that damn ranch he loved going to so much???

0 likes

Comrade Shampanyov wrote:

Doctor? wrote: SO, in a couple of weeks when it dawns on Jesusland that their ecconomy is still fucked, their troops are still killing and being killed in all sorts of places they've no business being, and that their freedoms are still non-existent under Shrub's laws (which $40 says Obama will leave in place)..........what's gonna happen? Riots? Wild backlash?

Nope.

Polls of this type aint worth shit, and you know it. People say one thing then do another. His head will be called for within a year (if he still has one by then).

Jeff, I'm genuinely for your errrrrm gain.

0 likes

EdelBrock wrote:

PETER COATES'S BELATED REDEMPTION wrote: I've said it before and I'll say it again: Obama thus far is shaping up to be nigger Blair.

I hope he proves otherwise, but this had serious shades of the UK in 1997 all over again. Only with more razzmatazz, obv.

How so? I really don't know much about Blair. How is his case and Obama's similar?

You'll see soon enough. You will not like it.

0 likes

Doctor? wrote:

Comrade Shampanyov wrote:

Doctor? wrote: SO, in a couple of weeks when it dawns on Jesusland that their ecconomy is still fucked, their troops are still killing and being killed in all sorts of places they've no business being, and that their freedoms are still non-existent under Shrub's laws (which $40 says Obama will leave in place)..........what's gonna happen? Riots? Wild backlash?

Nope.

Polls of this type aint worth shit, and you know it. People say one thing then do another. His head will be called for within a year (if he still has one by then)..

So your prediction-- not at all colored by your perspective-- is more accurate than some silly poll?

:lol:

0 likes

Comrade Shampanyov wrote:

Doctor? wrote: SO, in a couple of weeks when it dawns on Jesusland that their ecconomy is still fucked, their troops are still killing and being killed in all sorts of places they've no business being, and that their freedoms are still non-existent under Shrub's laws (which $40 says Obama will leave in place)..........what's gonna happen? Riots? Wild backlash?

Nope.

I think what Cambo is talking about is that people's expectations and so-called "patience" will soon crumble into an over powering burden that Obama won't be able to rise to (or any president could for that matter).

Obama really won't change much, and when people come to this realization there are bound to be some negative feedback.

0 likes

Jeffari-al-Texani wrote:

Doctor? wrote: OK, so everyone's happy that the illiterate godtard is out of the whitehouse

Not me...he's moving back to Dallas...why can't he just retire to that damn ranch he loved going to so much???

Texans gave him to the rest of the world-- you can have him back now.

0 likes

EdelBrock wrote:

Comrade Shampanyov wrote:

Doctor? wrote: SO, in a couple of weeks when it dawns on Jesusland that their ecconomy is still fucked, their troops are still killing and being killed in all sorts of places they've no business being, and that their freedoms are still non-existent under Shrub's laws (which $40 says Obama will leave in place)..........what's gonna happen? Riots? Wild backlash?

Nope.

I think what Cambo is talking about is that people's expectations and so-called "patience" will soon crumble into an over powering burden that Obama won't be able to rise to (or any president could for that matter).

Obama really won't change much, and when people come to this realization there are bound to be some negative feedback.

I know what Cambo is saying. First grade seems to have paid off for me, eh?

It's just that what Cambo is saying bears no relationship tp the reality of the situation. Obama has extremely high ratings, and more to the point, people who rate Obama favorably do not expect him to turn things around overnight-- they are quite clear in saying that it will take AT LEAST two years.

As usual, Cambo is talking out of the wrong orifice. Prolly some demand for that skill in a magic act, though. :thumb:

0 likes

Comrade Shampanyov wrote:

Doctor? wrote:

Comrade Shampanyov wrote:

Doctor? wrote: SO, in a couple of weeks when it dawns on Jesusland that their ecconomy is still fucked, their troops are still killing and being killed in all sorts of places they've no business being, and that their freedoms are still non-existent under Shrub's laws (which $40 says Obama will leave in place)..........what's gonna happen? Riots? Wild backlash?

Nope.

Polls of this type aint worth shit, and you know it. People say one thing then do another. His head will be called for within a year (if he still has one by then)..

So your prediction-- not at all colored by your perspective-- is more accurate than some silly poll?

:lol:

Time will tell.

Troops home and the cuban torture facility closed within the week then you think?

0 likes

Comrade Shampanyov wrote:

Jeffari-al-Texani wrote:

Doctor? wrote: OK, so everyone's happy that the illiterate godtard is out of the whitehouse

Not me...he's moving back to Dallas...why can't he just retire to that damn ranch he loved going to so much???

Texans gave him to the rest of the world-- you can have him back now.

since he's a Connecticut yankee, he should go back to where he was born...

0 likes

Let's record out two positions then for when they are needed.

Me: He'll be under serious attack for doing nothing, as the US continues it's nantucket sleighride down the shitter, within weeks, a few months at the outside. He will change nothing (other than, if the stokeie twat is right, introduce a whole pile of slimy oppressive legislation).

Commie: He'll sort the whole lot out within two years, and the current fireworks and pop concert worship will continue unopposed an unabated until then.

0 likes

Doctor? wrote:

Jeff, I'm genuinely for your errrrrm gain.

Well, the good thing is, I don't venture to the part of town he'll be living in too often, so it's not like we'll be running into each other too often...

I wonder if I'll even bother with his Presidential Library once it opens...

0 likes

Doctor? wrote:

Comrade Shampanyov wrote:

Doctor? wrote:

Comrade Shampanyov wrote:

Doctor? wrote: SO, in a couple of weeks when it dawns on Jesusland that their ecconomy is still fucked, their troops are still killing and being killed in all sorts of places they've no business being, and that their freedoms are still non-existent under Shrub's laws (which $40 says Obama will leave in place)..........what's gonna happen? Riots? Wild backlash?

Nope.

Polls of this type aint worth shit, and you know it. People say one thing then do another. His head will be called for within a year (if he still has one by then)..

So your prediction-- not at all colored by your perspective-- is more accurate than some silly poll?

:lol:

Time will tell.

Troops home and the cuban torture facility closed within the week then you think?

Order to close Gitmo given in the first week. Order to Joint Chiefs to prepare plans for Iraq withdrawal given in the first week.**

Quite possibly, both orders given on Wednesday...But if the orders are given by Friday, will you be saying "See!"?

** Obama is saying that the Iraq withdrawal must be orderly and not result in a loss of the gains achieved. And he was quite explicit in the campaign that he would shift our emphasis from Iraq to Afghanistan, so expect an increased American military effort-- including action IN Pakistan-- there.

0 likes

PIcking a fight with a nuclear power?

LOL

yup, much better than Shrub.

EDIT: still I suppose it's better than sending B52's and Apaches againt blokes armed with pointed sticks like the US usually does (and then loses).

0 likes

Doctor? wrote: Let's record out two positions then for when they are needed.

Me: He'll be under serious attack for doing nothing, as the US continues it's nantucket sleighride down the shitter, within weeks, a few months at the outside. He will change nothing (other than, if the stokeie twat is right, introduce a whole pile of slimy oppressive legislation).

Commie: He'll sort the whole lot out within two years, and the current fireworks and pop concert worship will continue unopposed an unabated until then.

I don't know how long it will take to sort things out. He's anticipating that health care alone will take at least 4 years (which is 4 years too many for me).

What I've been saying is that the polls indicate that the public doesn't expect him to solve our problems overnight-- they're giving him at least two years.

If the public folds within the first few weeks, you will have been proven right.

0 likes

Doctor? wrote: PIcking a fight with a nuclear power?

LOL

yup, much better than Shrub.

EDIT: still I suppose it's better than sending B52's and Apaches againt blokes armed with pointed sticks like the US usually does (and then loses).

Hardly. More like crossing the border to crush the Taliban, if Pakistan won't. He said as much in the campaign, if anybody was listening.

0 likes

EdelBrock wrote: *and Jiphy, its not like the French government is one to take example of, considering they go behind and against UN sanctions and decisions all the time, only concerned of thier own personal gain...

There is no government in France. The Ministers are just puppets. Sarkozy is a tiny dictator, he decides and does... If we had gulags, some of his ministers should already be there.

That said, let me recall you that I was very upset by the fact Sarkozy had been elected and on that day, you told me it was a good thing for my country to have an ultra conservative pro-American president. Does my memory betray or did you change your mind?

0 likes

Jeffari-al-Texani wrote:

I wonder if I'll even bother with his Presidential Library once it opens...

Do you suppose this will be in the collection?

It's got a charming story about a pet goat... :uhoh:

0 likes

Comrade Shampanyov wrote:

Doctor? wrote: PIcking a fight with a nuclear power?

LOL

yup, much better than Shrub.

EDIT: still I suppose it's better than sending B52's and Apaches againt blokes armed with pointed sticks like the US usually does (and then loses).

Hardly. More like crossing the border to crush the Taliban, if Pakistan won't. He said as much in the campaign, if anybody was listening.

Ah, the good old way of spreading civil wars... Did the US learn nothing about the consequences of bombing Cambodia during the Vietnam war?

0 likes

Jiphy wrote:

EdelBrock wrote: *and Jiphy, its not like the French government is one to take example of, considering they go behind and against UN sanctions and decisions all the time, only concerned of thier own personal gain...

There is no government in France. The Ministers are just puppets. Sarkozy is a tiny dictator, he decides and does... If we had gulags, some of his ministers should already be there.

That said, let me recall you that I was very upset by the fact Sarkozy had been elected and on that day, you told me it was a good thing for my country to have an ultra conservative pro-American president. Does my memory betray or did you change your mind?

I don't remember being pro-Sakozy, rather I was happy for the change and getting rid of Chirac. It seemed that Sarkozy was a better direction then him.

*note* that European conservatives are not equal and a quite opposite to American conservatives.

0 likes

Comrade Shampanyov wrote:

Doctor? wrote: Let's record out two positions then for when they are needed.

Me: He'll be under serious attack for doing nothing, as the US continues it's nantucket sleighride down the shitter, within weeks, a few months at the outside. He will change nothing (other than, if the stokeie twat is right, introduce a whole pile of slimy oppressive legislation).

Commie: He'll sort the whole lot out within two years, and the current fireworks and pop concert worship will continue unopposed an unabated until then.

I don't know how long it will take to sort things out. He's anticipating that health care alone will take at least 4 years (which is 4 years too many for me).

What I've been saying is that the polls indicate that the public doesn't expect him to solve our problems overnight-- they're giving him at least two years.

If the public folds within the first few weeks, you will have been proven right.

Commie is proving that the expectations of Obama are too high. With things as they are, chances are slim that any of Obama's promises will be kept, simply because they can't be kept (not because he doesn't desire them not to be kept).

Troops movement isn't going to change much. He'll lessen the troop level to 30,000 (about the amount in Afganistan), and then increase levels in Afganistan to Iraq levels. In the eyes of the troops and thier families, not much difference.

Health care isn't going to get handled or even touched upon in four years, it might get a half-arsed batting around, but no real progress towards anything.

Obama won't do anything for the economy, because it really has no bearing on the president (other than for him to calm the masses). It will return, because that is what the economy would do regardless.

He'll close the Cuban jail, but will transfer the inmates to another country (not our own), so in essence nothing will have changed except location.

Alot of the Amercan population will either be dismayed (but that's not saying much as everyone always thinks "I could do it better") while a few starry-eyed followers (like Commie) will defend everything he does as acceptable.

In a nutshell, not much change will take place.

0 likes

You're leaving NewOrderOnline

This link goes to an external website we don't operate, which has its own privacy policy and terms.

Destination:
Continue ↗