I am very pro animal rights a message to people that are cruel to my 4-legged pals what is wrong with people that have to abuse animals in this day and age
I am for tougher laws to have people locked up for a while, I am soooo happy that this year I am looking forward to working with animals and getting more involved in it
Miss Hooky's Angel
Dates
· UTC
Very Pro Animal Rights
Archived27 replies · 1,140 views
This is an archived legacy thread. Replies are closed, but the discussion is preserved.
← Back to Behind Closed Doors
28 posts
That reminds me, I'm taking my kids to a petting zoo this weekend. Anyone know the best place to pick up a Lousiville Slugger on the cheap?
Trouble is,as we all know,animals taste absolutely fucking nectar! This lad certainly does'nt like anyone fucking with his dog,mind!
Boatraceface wrote: Trouble is,as we all know,animals taste absolutely fucking nectar! This lad certainly does'nt like anyone fucking with his dog,mind!
this Animal rights concept.....
don't see how it'd work.
I just read my golfish it's Miranda rights
not a fookin glimmer
it's a thick cunt mind, and a fish
so anyway these animals WITH rights, have they got a constitution, lawyers, legal aid etc and why have they ignored fish?
GaryMac wrote: this Animal rights concept.....
don't see how it'd work.
I just read my golfish it's Miranda rights
not a fookin glimmer
it's a thick cunt mind, and a fish
so anyway these animals WITH rights, have they got a constitution, lawyers, legal aid etc and why have they ignored fish?
Whenever you think of taking the piss, please remember that there is a place where any piss take you can think of, is a reality.....
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/01/19/cass_sunstein_animal_rights/
Talking pets: Obama's guru wants animals to sue you
Making an Ass of the Law
By Andrew Orlowski • Get more from this author
Posted in Law, 19th January 2009 16:46 GMT
Obama's "regulation czar" Professor Cass Sunstein wants animals to be able to sue.
Animals can't reason or express themselves, naturally, so the litigation would be handled by human lawyers, acting as ventriloquists on behalf of the animal kingdom. Think Mister Ed the talking horse, crossed with Eliot Spitzer.
"Any animals that are entitled to bring suit would be represented by (human) counsel, who would owe guardian-like obligations and make decisions, subject to those obligations, on their clients' behalf," according to Sunstein. The Harvard legal scholar first proposed the argument in 2002.
"This doesn’t look good for hunters, ranchers, restaurateurs, biomedical researchers, or ordinary pet owners," says the food industry lobby group The Center for Consumer Freedom, which raised Sunstein's radical "rights" agenda. In Spain, activists have already proposed that apes be granted human rights.
Yet the Professor's proposal is fraught with practical difficulties. Ventriloquists have often seen their "animal" veer out of control: remember Rod Hull and Emu - or Bob Carrolgees and Spit The Dog? There would be chaos in the courtroom.
"Objection!"
The proposal can be seen as part of a trend to fight political battles through the courts by playing clever tricks with the statutes or legal processes. A parallel move is the decision to give life-giving CO2 status as a "pollutant". Where do these perverse ideas come from?
Ever since the New Deal, when Roosevelt packed attempted to pack the Supreme Court to ram home legislation, it's been the preferred route for US activists seeking a short cut. But at bottom, it's fundamentally undemocratic and contemptuous of politics. Instead of taking your argument to the people, and using the powers of persuasion, a bit of semantic clever-dickery will do. The strategy shows little confidence in one's own arguments, and worse, little faith in ordinary people to make rational decisions. It's elitism.
But it comes at a time when private agreements are bypassing and undermining well established public settlements. Last November, Google was handed a monopoly on the future of digital book in a backroom deal that replaces public agreements with private fiat. Authors must now trust Google to do the right thing - a position the medieval citizenry had to adopt with the ruling aristocrats, because it had little other choice.
The law may often be an ass, but it's still an improvement on what came before - the whims of the "wise" - and we still need it to work. ®
GaryMac wrote: the world has indeed gone fuckin mad
Actually the best bit is the mention that they've declared CO2 a pollutant. Meaning that exhaling is a crime.
EDIT: this is clearly the suitscum's ticket through this recession....."yes Daisy, of COURSE I'll sue the farmer for fondling your teats....what's that you say? a $12000 a day retainer and 95% of the winnings for me? how very generous, I'll just get your legal aid forms....and sign them for you".
Doctor? wrote:
GaryMac wrote: the world has indeed gone fuckin mad
Actually the best bit is the mention that they've declared CO2 a pollutant. Meaning that exhaling is a crime.
EDIT: this is clearly the suitscum's ticket through this recession....."yes Daisy, of COURSE I'll sue the farmer for fondling your teats....what's that you say? a $12000 a day retainer and 95% of the winnings for me? how very generous, I'll just get your legal aid forms....and sign them for you".
well the suitscum'll have a job defending ourkid's hound, the bollock sniffing fucker's a true deviant, I've got fookin rights too
Miss Hooky's Angel wrote: I am very pro animal rights a message to people that are cruel to my 4-legged pals what is wrong with people that have to abuse animals in this day and age
Well, good for you Missy.
Meanwhile, I could just murder a bacon sarnie 
I like ALL meat,apart from man-meat of course!
ALL americans love meat,does obama like meat,yipeeeeeeeeeeee!
Animal rights people are sickening cunts.
"ooooh I love all the creatures of the Earth and treat them all the same."
YOU CUNT!
What you mean is "I wanna look cool by defending cute and furry things with large friendly eyes". Panda's=save puppies=save monkeys=save cockroaches=mmmmmm not so sure Hagfish=mmmmmmaybe not. Cold+Flu=straight to the doctor for extermination. SmallPox=GENOCIDE
Hypocritcal, self serving retards. (mind you, people who test hairspray by spraying it in animal's eyes.....I sincerely hope they and their kids die painfully)
to add Cambo, I also like how Vegans go on and on about animal cruelty, but see no similarity when eating parts of plants... which I'm sure they really don't appreciate. At least an animal can defend itself...
Kath wrote: Animal Rights
Dunno what to think on this one?
Jury's out.
Just for wanting 40 cats in her house deserves the electric chair
EdelBrock wrote: to add Cambo, I also like how Vegans go on and on about animal cruelty, but see no similarity when eating parts of plants... which I'm sure they really don't appreciate. At least an animal can defend itself...
Know what you mean, but I still think people on the whole when considering animal cruelty, think of domestic animals only.
EdelBrock wrote:
Kath wrote: Animal Rights
Dunno what to think on this one?
Jury's out.
Just for wanting 40 cats in her house deserves the electric chair
Christ the smell must have been............:barf:
EdelBrock wrote: to add Cambo, I also like how Vegans go on and on about animal cruelty, but see no similarity when eating parts of plants... which I'm sure they really don't appreciate. At least an animal can defend itself...
Absolutely.
And they're happy enough to use plastic made from MILLIONS of dead beasties! (must be a statute of limitations on their "love").
BTW, being a wanton cunt to animals, making them suffer when it could be avoided, still makes you a cunt.
Funniest animal rights nut stories......
Vice Pres of PETA in the US...who opening advocate the lovely notion that if the only treatment comes from an animal, the patient dies......is a diabetic who uses canine insulin.
The fuckwits who broke into a mink farm (not a fan of fur farms myself but.....) and released all the mink. The mink took over the island on which the farm was located, ate every living thing in the lake, killing the lake, then died of starvation.........yup much better off than 3 meals a day with a blow to the head after a couple of years.
