why does jeff keep deleting ravi kumar's posts?

are they really offensive or something?

Because he's a prick, ravi that is, not jeff. deleting everything he writes will hopefully make him go away, the more people react to him, the longer he'll hang around.

Keep up the good work jeff.

AgentWood wrote: are they really offensive or something?

I think it might be to do with the fact that Ravi Kumar is a tit!

Ravi Kumar wrote:

who is this jeff kiddie anyway?

How fickle, you were asking him to do all sorts last week!

Jed Stephens wrote: Because he's a prick, ravi that is, not jeff. deleting everything he writes will hopefully make him go away, the more people react to him, the longer he'll hang around.

Keep up the good work jeff.

Nail.Hit.Head.

AgentWood wrote: are they really offensive or something?

A guy claiming that muslim extremists that blow up breetish kiddies (due to the unholiness of thier parents that once partied/drank at god-forsaken clubs) should be idolized for rinsing the world clean of infadels....

so if you would consider that thought, and any other post that would merge to that thought offensive....

Jeffari-al-Texani wrote:

AgentWood wrote: are they really offensive or something?

BECAUSE I CAN!!! BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!

erm...actually, he's already been banned once (under another moniker)...soooo...

anywho...he's a waste of a good wank...

Fixed that for ye

Jeffari-al-Texani wrote:

AgentWood wrote: are they really offensive or something?

BECAUSE I CAN!!! BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!

erm...actually, he's already been banned once (under another moniker)...soooo...

anywho...he's a naughty boy...

Thanks Jeff cause I see him on my topics too lately Hope you are well though keep rockin

EdelBrock wrote:

AgentWood wrote: are they really offensive or something?

A guy claiming that muslim extremists that blow up breetish kiddies (due to the unholiness of thier parents that once partied/drank at god-forsaken clubs) should be idolized for rinsing the world clean of infadels....

so if you would consider that thought, and any other post that would merge to that thought offensive....

Some one should go to the police on this if he is a muslim I am sorry this is scarying the crap out of me they are banned in all penpal clubs too!!!! world wide cause of extreme views Miss Hooky's Angel

EdelBrock wrote:

AgentWood wrote: are they really offensive or something?

A guy claiming that muslim extremists that blow up breetish kiddies (due to the unholiness of thier parents that once partied/drank at god-forsaken clubs) should be idolized for rinsing the world clean of infadels....

so if you would consider that thought, and any other post that would merge to that thought offensive....

got it.

Miss Hooky's Angel wrote:

EdelBrock wrote:

AgentWood wrote: are they really offensive or something?

A guy claiming that muslim extremists that blow up breetish kiddies (due to the unholiness of thier parents that once partied/drank at god-forsaken clubs) should be idolized for rinsing the world clean of infadels....

so if you would consider that thought, and any other post that would merge to that thought offensive....

Some one should go to the police on this if he is a muslim I am sorry this is scarying the crap out of me they are banned in all penpal clubs too!!!! world wide cause of extreme views Miss Hooky's Angel

He's no more a muslim than I am. He's a twat, a white, nazi twat. His penis is also best measured in attometers.

and he's probably having a wank about everyone talking about him!

Miss Hooky's Angel wrote:

Some one should go to the police on this if he is a muslim

being a muslim is not against the law, nor any other religion, and unfortunately being a twat isn't against the law either.

I think he works for Lenny Henry.

I can see him now, patrolling the corridors of a crappy city's Premier Inn wearing a badge with pride 'Ravi - fag controller'...........

Ravi Kumar wrote:

Doctor? wrote:

Miss Hooky's Angel wrote:

EdelBrock wrote:

AgentWood wrote: are they really offensive or something?

A guy claiming that muslim extremists that blow up breetish kiddies (due to the unholiness of thier parents that once partied/drank at god-forsaken clubs) should be idolized for rinsing the world clean of infadels....

so if you would consider that thought, and any other post that would merge to that thought offensive....

Some one should go to the police on this if he is a muslim I am sorry this is scarying the crap out of me they are banned in all penpal clubs too!!!! world wide cause of extreme views Miss Hooky's Angel

He's no more a muslim than I am. He's a twat, a white, nazi twat. His penis is also best measured in attometers.

I'm so terrible, Fradders won't even rim me!

1. Profit is not a bad thing. Huge profits made out of human agony, that IS a bad thing
2. If we're talking about global warming, it's a nonsense anyway.
3. London is a parasitic entity which produces nothing, london's success is purely based on the resources and labour of the regions you decry. If they are fucked, it is because they were raped, by london.
4. Mhammed fucked a 9 year old, we should all live like him I suppose.

So teens having babies is bad and immoral, never happened before modern times I'm sure...

...but if the teen girl was sold by her father to a 40 year man as a wife, then had a loveless baby as a 14 yr old, this is a superior morality?

No probably about it. He's the head priest, so he's the head kiddie toucher.

out of your gourd on the other stuff.

Anyone up for Holy men gone wild:Vatican city edition?

Ravi Kumar wrote: in your book anything that isnt on the left wing could be tagged 'nazi'.

So, you're denying that you're a member of the BNP, then?

Jed Stephens wrote: and he's probably having a wank about everyone talking about him!

Miss Hooky's Angel wrote:

Some one should go to the police on this if he is a muslim

being a muslim is not against the law, nor any other religion, and unfortunately being a twat isn't against the law either.

Hey I have my beliefs too but I keep them at home they have slaughter Christian people who have tried to give them humitarian grounds and that is the fuckin thanks we get Ravi hey they came here trying to scrap the Canadian national anthym and kicked out two lesbians in BC that came in to the doctors office that was against the principals so where do we draw the line like the talk shows said that they are taking our freedoms away

Miss Hooky's Angel wrote: hey they came here.....and kicked two lesbians in BC

EH?

AgentWood wrote:

EdelBrock wrote:

AgentWood wrote: are they really offensive or something?

A guy claiming that muslim extremists that blow up breetish kiddies (due to the unholiness of thier parents that once partied/drank at god-forsaken clubs) should be idolized for rinsing the world clean of infadels....

so if you would consider that thought, and any other post that would merge to that thought offensive....

got it.

Hey one blind woman in Toronto was kicked out of a taxi with her dog he said the dog is dirty get it out of my taxi I think she went to the Human Rights Commission I am hoping that he loses his license it is a true story it has caused a storm it is happening in the States in Minnesota anyways it is coming to Toronto too we have our problems too here some want to go in to politics and get after people that have dogs that caused a storm here too like I said where do we draw the line the politicians need to crack down on this

Burt Reynolds wrote:

Miss Hooky's Angel wrote: hey they came here.....and kicked two lesbians in BC

EH?

2 Lesbians went to the doctor a muslim woman found out that they were and they were kicked and she saying that is against her muslim religion the 2 lesbians filed a complaint with the Human Rights commission saying that they had been discrimanated by her so that caused a storm we fight for freedoms and rights but don't come in my country and try to change things if they don't like it please and kindly pack up and leave this is the western society and that is what we do or the kind of rights we have cause I am really getting sick and tired of them trying to change my way of life it is getting beyond too much now

Ravi Kumar wrote:

Miss Hooky's Angel wrote:

Jed Stephens wrote: and he's probably having a wank about everyone talking about him!

Miss Hooky's Angel wrote:

Some one should go to the police on this if he is a muslim

being a muslim is not against the law, nor any other religion, and unfortunately being a twat isn't against the law either.

Hey I have my beliefs too but I keep them at home they have slaughter Christian people who have tried to give them humitarian grounds and that is the fuckin thanks we get Ravi hey they came here trying to scrap the Canadian national anthym and kicked out two lesbians in BC that came in to the doctors office that was against the principals so where do we draw the line like the talk shows said that they are taking our freedoms away

I still haven't figured out I'm not meant to post here!!!

Fuckin' 'ell I'm starting to agree with him, but that's probably because I can't see which is the bigger idiot of the two, perhapd they need there own forum, fuckwittsonline.com maybe?

Jeffari-al-Texani wrote:

AgentWood wrote: are they really offensive or something?

BECAUSE I CAN!!! BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!

erm...actually, he's already been banned once (under another moniker)...soooo...

anywho...he's a naughty boy...

Last time Jeffari did this, the NOOLer in question ended up becoming a moderator...

Right then, let's assume this actually will stay on topic for once. To silence an agitator, sometimes leads to peace. Fuck, now I sound like a scientologist.

Miss Hooky's Angel wrote:

Burt Reynolds wrote:

Miss Hooky's Angel wrote: hey they came here.....and kicked two lesbians in BC

EH?

2 Lesbians went to the doctor a muslim woman found out that they were and they were kicked and she saying that is against her muslim religion the 2 lesbians filed a complaint with the Human Rights commission saying that they had been discrimanated by her so that caused a storm we fight for freedoms and rights but don't come in my country and try to change things if they don't like it please and kindly pack up and leave this is the western society and that is what we do or the kind of rights we have cause I am really getting sick and tired of them trying to change my way of life it is getting beyond too much now

Who gives a flying fuck. Go to a different doctor. Problem solved.

Miss Hooky's Angel wrote: but don't come in my country and try to change things if they don't like it please and kindly pack up and leave this is the western society and that is what we do or the kind of rights we have cause I am really getting sick and tired of them trying to change my way of life it is getting beyond too much now

My dear, I definitely second that. As a matter of fact, this perplexes me. Leave your chadra behind in the Sahara!! I understand the British and French are stuck with their Muslims, for their imprialist moms and dads failed big time in colonial politics, but Canadians?? Leave them alone.

|| | ||| 6217|| 8 || 3 wrote:

Miss Hooky's Angel wrote: but don't come in my country and try to change things if they don't like it please and kindly pack up and leave this is the western society and that is what we do or the kind of rights we have cause I am really getting sick and tired of them trying to change my way of life it is getting beyond too much now

My dear, I definitely second that. As a matter of fact, this perplexes me. Leave your chadra behind in the Sahara!! I understand the British and French are stuck with their Muslims, for their imprialist moms and dads failed big time in colonial politics, but Canadians?? Leave them alone.

Any Christian country is guilty of sending scumbag missionaries out to Muslim and other countries to encourage the spred of HIV (and presumably kiddie-fiddling, tho apparently paedophilia is enshrined in Islam just as much as Christianity).

Basically, until all the people from your country who are overseas come home, you have no right to complain. And if you're in the Americas, you should fuck off and take your insane religion home with you and leave the country to it's rightful owners.

Some examples of how Christianity is much better than that nasty mysogenistic, cruel, unfair, Islam thing........

"Behold, here is my daughter a maiden, and his concubine; them I will bring out now, and humble ye them, and do with them what seemeth good unto you: but unto this man do not so vile a thing. But the men would not hearken to him: so the man took his concubine, and brought her forth unto them; and they knew her, and abused her all the night until the morning: and when the day began to spring, they let her go." (Judges 19:24-25)

(Deuteronomy 22:23-24 NAB) If within the city a man comes upon a maiden who is betrothed, and has relations with her, you shall bring them both out of the gate of the city and there stone them to death: the girl because she did not cry out for help though she was in the city, and the man because he violated his neighbors wife.

When a man sells his daughter as a slave, she will not be freed at the end of six years as the men are. If she does not please the man who bought her, he may allow her to be bought back again. But he is not allowed to sell her to foreigners, since he is the one who broke the contract with her. And if the slave girl's owner arranges for her to marry his son, he may no longer treat her as a slave girl, but he must treat her as his daughter. If he himself marries her and then takes another wife, he may not reduce her food or clothing or fail to sleep with her as his wife. If he fails in any of these three ways, she may leave as a free woman without making any payment. (Exodus 21:7-11 NLT)

(Deuteronomy 22:28-29 NLT) If a man is caught in the act of raping a young woman who is not engaged, he must pay fifty pieces of silver to her father. Then he must marry the young woman because he violated her, and he will never be allowed to divorce her.

(2 Samuel 12:11-14 NAB) Thus says the Lord: 'I will bring evil upon you out of your own house. I will take your wives [plural] while you live to see it, and will give them to your neighbor. He shall lie with your wives in broad daylight. You have done this deed in secret, but I will bring it about in the presence of all Israel, and with the sun looking down.'

Then David said to Nathan, "I have sinned against the Lord."  Nathan answered David: "The Lord on his part has forgiven your sin: you shall not die.  But since you have utterly spurned the Lord by this deed, the child born to you must surely die."  [The child dies seven days later.]

If you want another few dozen just ask.

Interesting how this Hooky's Angel is so quick to require submission by Muslims, but when someone is against lesbians, well than that's all off the mark...

a bit contradictary n standards me thinks

|| | ||| 6217|| 8 || 3 wrote:

I understand the British and French are stuck with their Muslims, for their imprialist moms and dads failed big time in colonial politics, but Canadians?? Leave them alone.

Have you made a deliberate omission of Germany? Prick.

Both you and the stalker seem to have total inconsistency in your argument. Population migration has happened since the year dot, societies and cultures have adapted or failed. Are you advocating the re-establishment of the American Indian culture are are you sitting there dewy eyed wishing you were in the Rhineland eating sausages and planning world domination?

EdelBrock wrote: Interesting how this Hooky's Angel is so quick to require submission by Muslims, but when someone is against lesbians, well than that's all off the mark...

a bit contradictary n standards me thinks

She's a fruit cake mate, simple as.

recycle wrote:

EdelBrock wrote: Interesting how this Hooky's Angel is so quick to require submission by Muslims, but when someone is against lesbians, well than that's all off the mark...

a bit contradictary n standards me thinks

She's a fruit cake mate, simple as.

Lemon sponge?

Why the fuck has this fucking cunting bastard forum become a fucking quasi-theological debating hall??? Why do people think there is any kudos AT ALL in being able to quote scripture, whether it's from the bible or that fucking korma book everyone seems to think is so important??.

Shug has always been right: BCD should be about beer, football and shagging and NOTHING else.

Fuck off.

Jeffari-al-Texani wrote:

Doctor? wrote:

If you want another few dozen just ask.

erm...them is all Old Testament passages Cambo...before there were Christians...

Exactly.

Jeffari-al-Texani wrote:

Comrade Shampanyov wrote:

Jeffari-al-Texani wrote:

AgentWood wrote: are they really offensive or something?

BECAUSE I CAN!!! BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!

erm...actually, he's already been banned once (under another moniker)...soooo...

anywho...he's a naughty boy...

Last time Jeffari did this, the NOOLer in question ended up becoming a moderator...

but Mike had never been banned from the site...

neener neener!!!

So Ravi's taken it farther, which can only mean he'll rise higher.

Webmaster?

Comrade Shampanyov wrote:

Jeffari-al-Texani wrote:

Doctor? wrote:

If you want another few dozen just ask.

erm...them is all Old Testament passages Cambo...before there were Christians...

Exactly.

So are the ten commandments and the creation fairy tale. As long as you're admitting they're bullshit, I'll take that as a win thanks. Thought the christian bible had two parts, my bad. Better find some in the new testament then hadn't I.

And Martin, I assure you I don't carry that much bible around in my brain.

PETER COATES'S BELATED REDEMPTION wrote: Why the fuck has this fucking cunting bastard forum become a fucking quasi-theological debating hall??? Why do people think there is any kudos AT ALL in being able to quote scripture, whether it's from the bible or that fucking korma book everyone seems to think is so important??.

Shug has always been right: BCD should be about beer, football and shagging and NOTHING else.

Fuck off.

correctofuckinmondo fradders!

This place has really turned shite of lately....

http://www.neworderinfoweb.piczo.com

I propose we ban any MENTION of him.

His actual witterings are a fraction as irritating as all these fucking threads about him.

Or even better, just ban yourself from even thinking about him.

Diamond 383 wrote: I propose we ban any MENTION of him.

His actual witterings are a fraction as irritating as all these fucking threads about him.

Or even better, just ban yourself from even thinking about him.

As I see it we have three options;

1. Do as Col suggests and ignore him completely.

2. Continue as we are in the assumption that if these responses are causing him to be cracking himself off as much as we suspect, the result at some stage will hopefully be a painful knob rash.

3. If possible restrict himtoone thread and keep him as a Victorian style pet,to be prodded and poked for entertainment.

I'd vote for 3. That's what I've been doing. He makes me laugh - intentionally I expect.

this one is odd

Arab's think alot about young boys

PETER COATES'S BELATED REDEMPTION wrote: Why the fuck has this fucking cunting bastard forum become a fucking quasi-modo debating hall???

Fuck off.

I know. It gives me the right hump

James Thomas wrote:

3. If possible restrict himtoone thread and keep him as a Victorian style pet,to be prodded and poked for entertainment.

Yes. Lets just keep him to being a Victorian fuckpuppet, open to abuse like a little circus monkey.

James Thomas wrote:

3. If possible restrict himtoone thread and keep him as a Victorian style pet,to be prodded and poked for entertainment.

He wants to be petted, prodded, and poked by older men thou. That is his desire.

James Thomas wrote:

Diamond 383 wrote: I propose we ban any MENTION of him.

His actual witterings are a fraction as irritating as all these fucking threads about him.

Or even better, just ban yourself from even thinking about him.

As I see it we have three options;

1. Do as Col suggests and ignore him completely.

2. Continue as we are in the assumption that if these responses are causing him to be cracking himself off as much as we suspect, the result at some stage will hopefully be a painful knob rash.

3. If possible restrict himtoone thread and keep him as a Victorian style pet,to be prodded and poked for entertainment.

Surely - what with him being a devout advocate of Islam and us all being Godless Western infidels - we should just carpet bomb the cunt.

Shock and Awe, man.

PETER COATES'S BELATED REDEMPTION wrote:

James Thomas wrote:

Diamond 383 wrote: I propose we ban any MENTION of him.

His actual witterings are a fraction as irritating as all these fucking threads about him.

Or even better, just ban yourself from even thinking about him.

As I see it we have three options;

1. Do as Col suggests and ignore him completely.

2. Continue as we are in the assumption that if these responses are causing him to be cracking himself off as much as we suspect, the result at some stage will hopefully be a painful knob rash.

3. If possible restrict himtoone thread and keep him as a Victorian style pet,to be prodded and poked for entertainment.

Surely - what with him being a devout advocate of Islam and us all being Godless Western infidels - we should just carpet bomb the cunt.

Shock and Awe, man.

or in an homage to ray winstone do it on the cheap, a few pool balls and a wooly number

Sock and Jaw...... man

El Jarvo wrote:

Diamond 383 wrote: I'd vote for 3. That's what I've been doing. He makes me laugh - intentionally I expect.

If you want more of his work, go here. This was mentioned before Xmas (I think) but don't think anyone put a link up!

You get it all, and more. Islam, the BNP, Norverners, multiculturalism, virgins, etc, etc. He's a very confused young man, is Andrew.

Bloody hell, that place is to NOOL was Dave is to the BBC.....he just re-runs all his classic trolls there cos he can't think of new ones.

He should take a staunchly pro-microsoft stance (macs are toys, free software is for commies, terrorists and sprogtouchers....the usual Redmond zombie pish, he probably believes it already), and get his little arse onto Usenet, and look up comp.os.linux.advocacy ; possibly THE rudest, nastiest place on the internet, it makes NOOL in full netwar mode look like a hugfest.....and while he's browsing the world's newsgroups, he could pop over to alt.sysadmin.recovery and share some of his philospgy with those guys.....that would be fun (A.S.R is where the world's REAL BOFH's post and discuss their hatred and abuse of their flock of lusers. Upsetting the residents there is the very definition of a Bad Thing........cops might arrive the next morning to find 40GB of kiddiepron you didn't have previously (though in Kingy's case I doubt they'd need to plant anything).

GaryMac wrote:

PETER COATES'S BELATED REDEMPTION wrote:

James Thomas wrote:

Diamond 383 wrote: I propose we ban any MENTION of him.

His actual witterings are a fraction as irritating as all these fucking threads about him.

Or even better, just ban yourself from even thinking about him.

As I see it we have three options;

1. Do as Col suggests and ignore him completely.

2. Continue as we are in the assumption that if these responses are causing him to be cracking himself off as much as we suspect, the result at some stage will hopefully be a painful knob rash.

3. If possible restrict himtoone thread and keep him as a Victorian style pet,to be prodded and poked for entertainment.

Surely - what with him being a devout advocate of Islam and us all being Godless Western infidels - we should just carpet bomb the cunt.

Shock and Awe, man.

or in an homage to ray winstone do it on the cheap, a few pool balls and a wooly number

Sock and Jaw...... man

gets my vote.

Personally I think turning him over to a few members of the not-foaming-fundamentalist segment of the Muslim community should get him what's coming. Who am I kidding.....faced with this cocksack in the flesh, the local Women's Institute would be knitting a gallows within twenty minutes.

no sense of kumar

its a bad reaction that i cant fix

79 order wrote: no sense of kumar

Right, take that outside please sir!!!