Question Time next week

I was in the Question Time audience many moons ago in Norwich. It certainly isn't live (they film it about an hour before it goes out), which I was most upset by. Good line up when I was there: Richard Branson, Piers Morgan, that Labour MP with sticky-out ears.....

What I remember most was (a) the fact that I agreed with almost everything Piers Morgan said (which was scary) and (b) being gutted that the charming and very pretty girl sitting next to me didn't want to go for a drink afterwards. In fact, I bet she went backstage to suck Branson's cock, the fucking gold-digger.

Anyway, carry on....

I think he's come off like a right tit, as we were all hoping.

Must be less attractive to the voting public after this performance, surely?

It's a shame all the protesters gave him too much publicity in the first place.

Burt Reynolds wrote: I think he's come off like a right tit, as we were all hoping.

Must be less attractive to the voting public after this performance, surely?

It's a shame all the protesters gave him too much publicity in the first place.

Well, he didnt "win" for sure. I got it wrong, but it was set up to me. Not one mention of the postie strike.

He was never attractive to the voters in the first place. And by the time of the election, this will long be forgotten. Less than 1% of the vote, as usual.

Alan Davies is on This Week now being very sensible. Hooray.

The Teacher wrote:

Alan Davies is on This Week now being very sensible. Hooray.

isn't he just? good man.

Shug wrote:

Burt Reynolds wrote: I think he's come off like a right tit, as we were all hoping.

Must be less attractive to the voting public after this performance, surely?

It's a shame all the protesters gave him too much publicity in the first place.

We must fight for the right for him to come across as a right tit.

of course. Curiosity killed the cat.

I do think the public have the right to view and make their own minds up; they surely can't be that stupid. From what I saw, he looked like a prize cunt.

If the BBC ban stuff it often makes it more popular. E.g. 'Relax' FGTH.

Public not stupd? You don't work with them then do you.

Anyway, ickle diddums is saying he's been demonised. Poor thing, at least the BNP would never demonise individuals or indeed entire nationalities, skin tones, retardligious views etc.

Pretty solid performance from Griffin but a dreadful audience which Dimbleby failed to moderate at all; numerous interruptions while Nick was in mid flow.

Bonnie Greer and that Indian bird were crap but the Lib-Dem gave Nick a run for his money, fair play.

Dunno why people (still) cant accept the concept of racial identity?

They should have shown him out the front door when he left, that way he could have had a really 'vigourous debate' with the public.

El Jarvo wrote:

Part of the establishment though, isn't she? Tory Baroness. You can't get more establishment than that. And a Muslim to boot.

Come a long long way, she used to have a fag behind the bike sheds with Lucy when they were at school.

My feelings on the whole BNP debacle (if anyones at al remotely interested). I think it was right for BBC to invite Nick Griffin on. Give him to chance to speak and let everyone make their own mind up as to whether any of it carries any weight or if hes just spouting complete crap.

I came away thinking he was a complete imbacle. Unable to hold a serious debate, resorting to chuckling like a schoolboy or spouting crap. No matter how disillusioned I might get with the current governement or the other parties I vow never to resort to voting BNP. Complete waste of time.

He did make one valid point. Jack Straws dad being banged up for refusing to fight in the second world war while his was in RAF. That kept Straw quiet for a bit.

It did become abit of a BNP circus and from what I sore it was a shame that the programme didnt tackle any other issues of the day.

Griffin did nothing to convince me he was a decent bloke or had worthwhile policies. And he looks like a complete weirdo.

NO Regret wrote: He did make one valid point. Jack Straws dad being banged up for refusing to fight in the second world war while his was in RAF. That kept Straw quiet for a bit.

Valid?

Brotherhood all the way wrote:

Dunno why people (still) cant accept the concept of racial identity?

Something to do with the phrase "never again" I think

Dickcheese.

The only thing that in any way surprised me about the programme was Griffin's refusal to 'dilute the brand'. I thought he'd at least try and come across as a half-decent bloke and refuse to rise to the bait. But he just gave it full far-Right rhetoric at practically every opportunity: his rant about homosexuality was particularly grim.

But after all the hyperbole and folk getting their knickers in a twist I don't suppose the show has altered a single person's view of the BNP (or any of the other parties) one little bit. Hopefully now we can get back to more important matters, like when is Cheryl Cole going to do a full split-beaver photo shoot? And where can we hire a wrestling ring for Shug and Liam to settle their differences like men?

Doctor? wrote:

Brotherhood all the way wrote:

Dunno why people (still) cant accept the concept of racial identity?

Something to do with the phrase "never again" I think

Dickcheese.

Yes, I was going to comment on Andrew King's (obvious) comment on this thread, but then I remembered I was going to try and ignore him...

Clayhead Liberation Faction wrote: like when is Cheryl Cole going to do a full split-beaver photo shoot?

If you find out, can you let me know?

Speaking a Cheryl Cole,did anycunt see her 'singing' on that x factor shite last week?

Tell ye what shes got a fuckin cheek judging anyones singing after that

I still would though

Nick King wrote:

NO Regret wrote: He did make one valid point. Jack Straws dad being banged up for refusing to fight in the second world war while his was in RAF. That kept Straw quiet for a bit.

Valid?

Id say it was valid. Jack Straws hardly from good stock is he. A spineless toad like his old man. Just my opinion of course.

NO Regret wrote:

Nick King wrote:

NO Regret wrote: He did make one valid point. Jack Straws dad being banged up for refusing to fight in the second world war while his was in RAF. That kept Straw quiet for a bit.

Valid?

Id say it was valid. Jack Straws hardly from good stock is he. A spineless toad like his old man. Just my opinion of course.

Spineless, just because he refused to go to war?

Nick King wrote:

NO Regret wrote:

Nick King wrote:

NO Regret wrote: He did make one valid point. Jack Straws dad being banged up for refusing to fight in the second world war while his was in RAF. That kept Straw quiet for a bit.

Valid?

Id say it was valid. Jack Straws hardly from good stock is he. A spineless toad like his old man. Just my opinion of course.

Spineless, just because he refused to go to war?

Presumably. Or maybe the glib quip about 'stock' was a reference to his Jewishness. Either way, the person making the comment proves himself to be a total dick once more. Surely being a conscientious objector to mass slaughter is the kind of thing we should really be applauding?

Nick King wrote:

NO Regret wrote:

Nick King wrote:

NO Regret wrote: He did make one valid point. Jack Straws dad being banged up for refusing to fight in the second world war while his was in RAF. That kept Straw quiet for a bit.

Valid?

Id say it was valid. Jack Straws hardly from good stock is he. A spineless toad like his old man. Just my opinion of course.

Spineless, just because he refused to go to war?

Its just my opinion. Everyones entitled to theirs. I dont expect people to agree. You could argue he was standing up to his right against mass slaughter but id prefer to view that he had the chance to help fight for his country and he chose not to.

Clayhead Liberation Faction wrote:

Nick King wrote:

NO Regret wrote:

Nick King wrote:

NO Regret wrote: He did make one valid point. Jack Straws dad being banged up for refusing to fight in the second world war while his was in RAF. That kept Straw quiet for a bit.

Valid?

Id say it was valid. Jack Straws hardly from good stock is he. A spineless toad like his old man. Just my opinion of course.

Spineless, just because he refused to go to war?

Presumably. Or maybe the glib quip about 'stock' was a reference to his Jewishness. Either way, the person making the comment proves himself to be a total dick once more. Surely being a conscientious objector to mass slaughter is the kind of thing we should really be applauding?

Complete dick now. hmm. why do you always have to make personal attacks. i wasnt refering to any Jewism.

Id rather save my applauding for the heroic man and women that put theyre lives on the line to protect our country from invasion. call me old fashioned, patriotic, whatever.