Can you believe this $&^*?

I can't believe this.....poor ole Paul McC! (must be the legless model goading him on)

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20021218/ap\_on\_en\_mu/music\_beatles\_battle\_6

I can see his beef about 'Yesterday'...I mean if I wrote a song entirely, and someone who has nothing to do with writing/recording it is getting what is probably some significant cash, I would feel like a bitch too.....in this case, an Ono-bitch......

Originally posted by Mr. Streak I can see his beef about 'Yesterday'...I mean if I wrote a song entirely, and someone who has nothing to do with writing/recording it is getting what is probably some significant cash, I would feel like a bitch too.....in this case, an Ono-bitch......

But should he use that as a basis to rewrite history? The world knows those songs as "Lennon/McCartney" songs, and all of a sudden he wants to change that? It would be too much of a hassle to go through each individual song and say "John did this bit, Paul did that" or assign authorship totally to one man when it's obvious there was no collaberation on it. The part where McCartney fears he will be "overshadowed" because Lennon's name comes first is complete and utter BS (and I don't mean Barney Sumner). As much as I despise the things he's done in the past (Wings comes to mind) Paul does deserve admiration for his talent, which is obvious on songs like Hey Jude and so on. But this just seems petty, no way around it.