Originally posted by Pizda
> Originally posted by Al Jarvis
In fairness, Nirvana and Joy Division were entirely different animals.Joy Division in 1980 were little more than a cult band, not really known beyond their own country. Nirvana, on the other hand, were an international phenomenom embraced the world over. We'd be talking about Cobain whether he was still alive today, whereas with Curtis a lot of people probably took note - I'm as guilty as anyone - simply because he took his own life. It was a fantastic marketing ploy, though possibly a tad extreme.
Didn't Wilson once make a comment along the lines of Curtis' death being the best thing to happen to factory, though he later claimed it was taken out of context.Cobains'death was probably the best thing to happen to Nirvana as they'd already slipped into self indulgent wank mode.
There's a section in Mick Middles' book dealing with that, can't remember the name of the interviewer who wrote that but Wilson always said he never said it (and for once, considering the tabloid nature of a lot of British news, I believe him
)
I think Kurt's death effectively killed grunge (which might not have been such a bad thing considering all the bandwagon-jumping groups coming out then), and alternative rock devolved into "rage metal" or "rap metal" or whatever you wanna call that shit. With Ian, taking into account the fact that I wasn't even a year old when this happened, there wasn't necessarily a "Punk is dead" vibe (probably because the Clash and similar artists were still around). It would be safe to say that in their time, JD had nowhere near the massive exposure or fame as Nirvana. There was no MTV to constantly play "LWTUA" all day or unplugged specials or any of that, and JD had yet to tour the States.
I always felt sorry for Kurt because he truly was a victim of his fame. A lazy self-serving victim, to be sure, but a victim nonetheless