Skip to content

WFTSC: CD of the week + review in The Guardian

Archived

22 replies · 1,072 views

This is an archived legacy thread. Replies are closed, but the discussion is preserved.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/arts/fridayreview/story/0,12102,1439810,00.html

Factory record

New Order have a stunning reputation - but it wasn't built with albums like this. By Alexis Petridis

Friday March 18, 2005The Guardian

A few weeks ago, the Daily Mirror featured an article in which New Order bassist Peter Hook ruminated upon the pressing issues of the day, among them the estrangement of former Westlife singer Brian McFadden from I'm a Celebrity winner Kerry Katona. "The way he's treated his missus is disgusting. Why would anyone still buy his record?" fumed Hooky. "He makes Darren Day look like a saint."

You couldn't ask for a more telling demonstration of New Order's unlikely ascent from truculent enigma to something approaching national treasure status. In recent years, the messy public collapse of their label Factory, the onset of middle age, and their immortalisation in Michael Winterbottom's film 24 Hour Party People, have combined to lift what their sleeve designer Peter Saville described as the band's "veil of secrecy" that had enveloped them since their days as Joy Division. And something else has emerged with this loss of mystique: New Order enjoy a quite staggering level of influence. It is hard to name a new rock band not in thrall either to Joy Division's gloomy intensity or New Order's effortless melding of technology and rock guitars, a fact underlined by the presence of Scissor Sister Ana Matronic on Waiting for the Sirens' Call.

Theoretically, critical acclaim and commercial success should be a given for New Order's eighth album, but it's not as simple as that. Their current position mirrors that of David Bowie 20 years ago: despite an unparalleled hold over artists half their age, their own quality control seems to have gone slightly awry. Unlike Bowie, they're not being driven mad by the sound of youngsters recycling their oeuvre; they have yet to film a Pepsi commercial while dressed up as a nutty scientist or belt out their hits while abseiling onto the back of a giant spider, as Bowie did in the mid-1980s. But nor have they released a consistently great album since 1989's Technique. Instead, there have been middling solo works and two patchy collections: 1993's Republic, delivered to raise cash for the ailing Factory, and 2001's tentative reunion Get Ready.

Waiting for the Sirens' Call initially appears more confident than its predecessor, which tactfully skirted around New Order's status as dance pioneers on the grounds that "we don't go to clubs any more". The dance beats are now back, but it proves a mixed blessing. While no embarrassment, the house-influenced Guilt Is a Useless Emotion and the lumpy reggae of I Told You So have none of the dazzling purpose that marked New Order's previous dancefloor experiments. Then you felt the band were grabbing acid house or electro by the neck and forcing it to submit to their own unique will. Here, they appear to be doing what's expected of them in order to appease their fans.

Indeed, New Order's relationship with their fans underscores Waiting for the Sirens' Call's failings. Too much of the album passes by in a pleasantly inconsequential blur. Bernard Sumner's lyrics sound dashed-off even by his famously sketchy standards: Hey Now What You Doing finds him rhyming the line "Is it love or is it hate?" with the highly improbable "banging on an open gate". You get the distinct impression that the band are relying on the fact that, for a music fan of a certain age and certain persuasion, the very sound of New Order - Hook's high bass, the chilly synthesisers, the propulsive clatter of Steve Morris's drums and Sumner's voice, pitched somewhere between strained emoting and reedy diffidence, apparently unsure whether he means every word and or is desperately trying to suppress a smirk - is impossible to resist, regardless of the material. They have a point: even the album's weakest moments, Morning Night and Day and Turn, successfully transport your average thirtysomething listener into a nostalgic reverie. It's beguiling - but not quite beguiling enough to stop you wishing they would throw you something more substantial or unexpected.

That happens three times. Working Overtime, with its odd rockabilly rhythm, Stooges-inspired riff and hilarious approximation of Lou Reed's bitchy monotone, at least sounds like nothing New Order have tried before. Krafty is a pop song so strong that not even Sumner announcing: "I think the world is a beautiful place, with mountains, lakes and the human race", can spoil things. And the title track is perfection itself: softly pulsing electronics, an improbably simple and beautiful melody and a bassline that wraps itself around the vocals in a way no other band would think of doing. That one moment suggests a teenager, drawn to New Order for the first time by their current influence, might understand what all the fuss is about.

Related articles 03.03.2005: New Order get mobile 04.02.2005: Peter Hook talks to Bloc Party 11.06.2002: New Order, Finsbury Park, London 20.07.2001: Review: New Order

Useful links New Order official site Listen to Waiting for the Sirens' Call

0 likes

OFFICIAL?

Gruniad is my official newspaper.

NOOL is my homepage.

I always knew I was right!

0 likes

considering they call Morning Night and Day and Turn the weak points of the album, i can only judge the accuracy of the reviewer's ears.

0 likes

I'm with Churchy on the Turn thing.

& that's review for album of the week? :scratch:

0 likes

Indeed, Turn is one of the album's weaker moments? :laugh: :eek3:

0 likes

Reviews are subjective so who cares :shrug:

0 likes

I think that's a decent assessment, to be honest. Comments about "Turn" aside, the reviewer pinpoints the LPs status as "a New Order record". As a fan of a certain age, I think  it's lovely, but like your man says, I dunno what an 18 year old who's picked up on them since the current rash of faux-New Wave acts would make of it....

...but then, they're not making records for 18-year-olds, thank fuck.

0 likes

I was thinking similar notions. I wondered just what 'Krafty' would sound like to new ears. A throwaway pop song? - if you didn't know the band and saw them perform it live you might think - what, these geezers wrote that song?

It's quite mind boggling.

Casting my mind's eye back to the 80's - when I finally got to see what Ian Curtis actually looked like my image of an aged crusty, beard wearing, slightly portly fisherman were quickly dispelled.

0 likes

Interesting review.  As with most of everyone here I don't agree with them over MNAD and Turn (the highest points of the album for me) but every review is subjective.  At least it looks like the reviewer's actually listened to the album, which is more than the Q one.  In the Q one it sounded like the reviewer skimmed through the album in one listen, singling out tracks with "memorable titles".  They didn't even comment on Turn which is shocking as I've yet to read a bad review of it on this messageboard.  It's one of those new tracks that everyone seems to like, which is quite an achievement for the band. Also, there's that term "lumpy" again!  Used to describe the very same song (I Told You So)... A bit of muzak journo plagerism going on perhaps??  I still don't understand lumpy or how it's meant to identify a song.

Ally.

0 likes

'Lumpy'; a lazily prepared food product. You've tasted it before, except it was previously made with panache.

No-one enjoys a lumpy mashed potato - but we still eat it.

0 likes

You could say a camel is lumpy too, couldn't you.

:\pimp3:

0 likes

... only when they're full of Arabian seaman.

0 likes

huntsman wrote: 'Lumpy'; a lazily prepared food product. You've tasted it before, except it was previously made with panache. No-one enjoys a lumpy mashed potato - but we still eat it.

I said in a different thread "lumpy" is better to describe the cheese sauce that goes with yer chicken of an evening :uhoh:  But in the sense of critisising a song I'm lost!  I like "I Told You So" anyway, we could have easily had a Slow Jam in it's place, which is shite.

Ally.

0 likes

And what if a Marske badger is lumpy?

:\pimp3:

0 likes

I can't say I agree with eating chicken but I can understand why your not overtly keen on The Guardian using 'lumpy' to describe a New Order song.

Thing is, they are bang on the money. It's not particularly arresting and indeed lacks a punch. It is the musical equivalent of a badly prepared mashed potato.

Slow Jam Butty on the other hand - as you suggest - is far worse than simply lumpy potato. It is almost bordering on pig feed.

0 likes

huntsman wrote: Slow Jam Butty on the other hand - as you suggest - is far worse than simply lumpy potato. It is almost bordering on pig feed.

:laugh:  That's it New Order should do their own range of organic food a'la lump-ness.

Ally.

0 likes

Electronic was a middling solo work?

0 likes

AgingHipster wrote: Electronic was a middling solo work?

Compared to New Order ? Yes.

In fact, compared to many bands, yes.

0 likes

AgingHipster wrote: Electronic was a middling solo work?

The side projects (apparently the band hate that reference for their other bands) are generally given a raw deal.  Unfairly so.  I thought Electronic were great, they had a few middling songs but they were mostly either on the second album or rightly appeared as b-sides to the singles.  The first album is amazing.  I personally consider Electronic's stuff like Tighten Up, Reality, Some Distant Memory, Forbidden city and Make It Happen right up there with much of New Order's work.  Make It Happen had alot of balls musically speaking.  It took a risk unlike most of the samey Alt Rock NO pumped out on GR.  In many ways Twisted Tenderness was the original blueprint for Get Ready, but much better IMO.

It's obvious we'll probably never get any more side project records (Freebass?  What happened there?) but I still enjoy alot of tracks from those albums, even Revenge!

Ally.

0 likes

This reviewer is a twat. He doesn't like Turn. OK, but fookin hell, he likes Working Overtime, which is the only truly embarassing moment of the album! :nonono: About todays kids, the most of them are too young to remember how music was when it was still good, last time Creation released a good record they weren't even going to primary school, so it doesn't matter, they're lost. Anyway Krafty is commercial enough to work with them.

0 likes

The "kids" are going to hate Krafty. It's pop, but lacking the dark edge of NO's best work. You'll find people my age (22) tend to go for Joy Division over New Order anyday. JD is seen as dark rock, New Order as kitschy 80's. Alas, the college crowd..... :nonono:

0 likes

I'm 17. Krafty's great.

0 likes

Can't remember if these have been mentioned before (either on the old board or this one), but talking of reviews/magazines/etc (and saving starting a new thread!)...

  • The latest Mixmag (the one with Bez on the front cover as Alex from Clockwork Orange) has Hooky picking his best records. It's also got a review of WFTSC in it.

  • The latest i-D magazine has a small quarter page article on Peter Saville's new foray into design - snowboards! The two snowboards available are one with the "Unknown Pleasures" mountains down them, and the other has the colour coding for "Blue Monday" down it. Apparently, you can pick them up in a shop in West London - can't remember the name - Hideout/Hideaway (or something like that)

  • Also, Amazon UK are streaming parts of the WFTSC album on a daily basis, where you can also mail them and get them to ask New Order a question... Link http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/tg/feature/-/560407/ref=amb_ilm_194627/202-5464850-4131833

l8rs,

Nick ;)

0 likes

You're leaving NewOrderOnline

This link goes to an external website we don't operate, which has its own privacy policy and terms.

Destination:
Continue ↗