Skip to content

Poll: NO versus JD Box sets

Archived

12 replies · 552 views

This is an archived legacy thread. Replies are closed, but the discussion is preserved.

?Heart and Soul (JD)Retro (NO)

0 likes

J.D.

0 likes

H&S actually had some heart and soul put into its creation, not to mention more than a dash of substance.

0 likes

heart and soul gave us things that we haven't heard before, like the demos of ceremony and IALP....whereas retro gave us multiple versions of things we've heard a thousand times before (fine time, anyone?).

0 likes

I don't know who proof read the ETRO Box set, but it is full or gramatical errors

0 likes

"Retro" was an absolute wasted opportunity. Shame, 'cause there were so many possibilities. Points for trying to do something a little more thoughtful than the standard chronological tracklisting, though.

"Heart and Soul," on the other hand, is pretty much perfect. It has everything!

(oh - any chance we could dump those lameass emoticons and get the use of HTML back in these posts instead?)

0 likes

Without a doubt Heart & Soul.

0 likes

bit unfair comparing the two.

jd only had 2 albums (ignoring live & compilations) so they had to find extra stuff to make a 4 disc compilation, far easier than for new order who had released loads more material.

the bonus disc was also a big fillip for the collector. sure we'd all have diffrent ideas about what we'd want on retro, but that just shows you how impossible it would be to do a 4 cd box set for new order.

0 likes

I have to disagree. Box sets are for collectors, and MUST have unreleased and rare recordings. Heart & Soul is class, Retro is absolute crap (except by the booklet, perhaps). It´s just that simple.

0 likes

come off it mr d - we all know box sets are for xmas really.

0 likes

Heart and Soul.  Joy Division created the greatest music ever recorded.

0 likes

I went for Retro (i'm the only one so far[:$]   )

For me, anything they release is for listening - not for collecting, and I prefer NO to JD.

I really enjoy Heart & Soul - it has everything, so whats not to enjoy.

But Retro has, for me, more better songs - that I listen to far more often.  Its not everything, it dosent have much exclusive/rarities but each disc captures a different mood (different sides to NO?) & they all get a listen frequently - depending on the humour i'm in.[:D][8o|][+o(][<:o)]

0 likes

I prefered Heart and Soul for the many reasons people already stated. There were only a few tracks on Retro w/ the bonus disc I was interested in. I was more excited about purchasing "In Session" then I was with Retro.

0 likes

You're leaving NewOrderOnline

This link goes to an external website we don't operate, which has its own privacy policy and terms.

Destination:
Continue ↗