recent pics of ian curtis' macclesfield

CLICK on the link to go to :

IAN CURTIS / JOY DIVISION PHOTOS

member of the New Order/Joy Division Webring

enjoy!

When I saw RECENT, I wondered what you meant

Thought I would see bones

Don't give up your DAY JOB:D

more pics here, old ones, this time...

http://www.zyworld.com/cameraman/iremembernothing.htm

almansoglasnost wrote: ok, same thread in every fooking forum. you´re THIS close to be a spammer, you know that? READ THE NOOL CODE OF CONDUCT!!!!

Agreed.

Every time I see one of these threads, I open it, only to see the EXACT SAME PHOTOS.

What is the point of opening a new thread every day with the EXACT SAME PHOTOS? I get it already... You went on a pilgrimage to Manchester, you took some photos, and shared them with us. You don't need to open a new thread about it every day.

Don't you think you guys are being a little too harsh? Poor guy just registered today. He just wanted to share some photos.

My mistake, sort of (unless he's got 2 accounts)...

BUT these pictures were posted here by dr0 on April 30...

here by dr0 on May 4...

here by dr0 on May 6...

and here by damnsave at 4:25 on April 8... and again on this thread 7 minutes later (same forum by the way).

I haven't even bothered to post all the Ian/Macclesfield picture threads damnsave posted on every other NOOL forum, but they're all over the place. And I have no idea whether dr0 and damnsave are two different people or the same person, but I assumed without checking that the same person was posting the same pics multiple times, so if I'm wrong, sorry for sounding so harsh...

But I really do get that dr0 went to Manchester, and there's no need to keep posting the pics over and over and over. If somebody wants to reply to your thread, they will. Fair enough?

Now, next time you post some Macclesfield pics, they damn well better be a new batch.

bLuE oRdEr wrote: Now, next time you post some Macclesfield pics, they damn well better be a new batch.

And that's not meant to be harsh-sounding, by the way....

5 8 6 wrote: Don't you think you guys are being a little too harsh? Poor guy just registered today. He just wanted to share some photos.

Yes, you're right. I recant. He posted in the other forums because they're in other languages.

And the first poster? Just trying to share-- really nice about it too.

dr0 and damnsave (great name, btw): Maybe, just maybe, try posting a thread once instead of multiple times... K?

Ian Curtis is in this Wednesday's N.M.E

Server Error in "/" Application wrote: Thought I would see bones

Another Star Trek character, the plot thickens.

If it wasn't for your dead body, I'd be a non-singing person today.

baldrick wrote: Ian Curtis is in this Wednesday's N.M.E

More info please.

Buffer Low wrote:

baldrick wrote: Ian Curtis is in this Wednesday's N.M.E

More info please.

Don't worry. It'll be 2 weeks at least before we get it. We should know what it is by then.

BTW Buffet keep looking out for the next Q,& Mojo. the current Q has cash for questions.