Skip to content

And people bitched about Jonathan Ross ....

Archived

40 replies · 3,491 views

This is an archived legacy thread. Replies are closed, but the discussion is preserved.

Remember when Barney tried out for Sigue Sigue Sputnick?! :skeptic: :laugh:

0 likes

Nice one Al ..if this doesnt put the Ross performance into context for people on here nothing will .......how people forget ...

0 likes

lol i was actually thinking about this the other day after reading some of the wank on the ross show topic. new order have always been the buffoons of pop/rock,the fact that they aint scared of having fun with it makes them all the better for me.;)

0 likes

Al Jarvis wrote: Remember when Barney tried out for Sigue Sigue Sputnick?! :skeptic: :laugh:

Is this really barney?

0 likes

No, they hired Holly Johnson as a stunt double just in case the Pyrotechnics blew up. This was a photo taken while New Order did the real stuff.

0 likes

your fucking with me. very nice. Touched by the hand of god?

0 likes

Ace! :evil4:

0 likes

Was it true that they did this vid as a piss take and to show their distaste for deff lepeord and that genre in general :rofl: If it is true, nice touch of The Order :clap:

0 likes

Daver wrote: Ace! :evil4:

:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

(I got that one - yeeah!)

0 likes

Nice one Al ..if this doesnt put the Ross performance into context for people on here nothing will .......how people forget

what a sec....

The Touched video was MEANT as satire!

some of their current behavior is sadly NOT...

I keep seeing these allusions to the Touched video, as if that is proof that New Order, in the past, also were idiots...

NO!

Touched is a JOKE video.... they were having a go at the heavy metal videos of the era....

and it makes me crack up every time I see it...

of COURSE New Order have always been jokesters.... but some recent stuff is sadly NOT tongue in cheek.... some folks are no longer laughing with them, but AT them...

0 likes

Is it truth that people in the US wanted their money back, because they took the video for real, and thought they were a real metal band?

0 likes

Tarbox23 wrote: .... some folks are no longer laughing with them, but AT them...

Then those folks have missed the point entirely, surely?!

0 likes

Tarbox23 wrote:

Nice one Al ..if this doesnt put the Ross performance into context for people on here nothing will .......how people forget

what a sec....

The Touched video was MEANT as satire!

some of their current behavior is sadly NOT...

I keep seeing these allusions to the Touched video, as if that is proof that New Order, in the past, also were idiots...

NO!

Touched is a JOKE video.... they were having a go at the heavy metal videos of the era....

and it makes me crack up every time I see it...

Could you please state the obvious again?

0 likes

Tarbox - very well said.

0 likes

Al Jarvis wrote:

Tarbox23 wrote: .... some folks are no longer laughing with them, but AT them...

Then those folks have missed the point entirely, surely?!

Sorry, but what point have I missed entirely?

0 likes

Could you please state the obvious again?[

well, you wouldn't think I would have to, right?

but apparently some folks (those at the top of this thread) DO think the Touched video is comparable to the Ross show... as if new order was PURPOSELY trying to look silly on the Ross show....

did you read the whole thread Your Holiness? apparently it is not all that obvious to everyone.... :confused2:

0 likes

Tarbox, you're right on the mark. Comparing a parody (TBHOG) to a serious performance (Jetstream/JR show) is ridiculous. New Order's performance on Ross perfectly illustrates their poor live musicianship. It's really fun to be in the arena when they play but watching them on TV/DVD etc or listening to a live bootleg is painful. They are, for the most part, terrible live. They have lost touch with the peripherals of being in a band that they used to hold close: ie. Artwork, singles, promotion. They didn't know what the album looked like until they got to LA. The guys at Warners told them to get Ana to sing on Jetstream and they obviously have no control over what gets released and who gets to remix their tracks. If i'm wrong, i'd love to hear the proof but i fear those things that helped form most of our love for New Order are sadly missing. The creative aspect died with Rob Gretton.

The correct analogy would have been either Blue Monday at TOTP or the BBC sessions in 84.

0 likes

Hans Jugger wrote:

Al Jarvis wrote:

Tarbox23 wrote: .... some folks are no longer laughing with them, but AT them...

Then those folks have missed the point entirely, surely?!

Sorry, but what point have I missed entirely?

That this is New Order with a couldn't-give-a-fcuk attitude. Same attitude they've always had. Same attitude they had when they butchered Blue Monday on TOTP or indeed Barney danced like a gimp on Fine Time. That point.

0 likes

Tarbox23 wrote: but apparently some folks (those at the top of this thread) DO think the Touched video is comparable to the Ross show... as if new order was PURPOSELY trying to look silly on the Ross show....

Rrrrrright, so remind me why Barney looked silly on Jonathan Ross?! Is it because he whooped and danced like a tw&t?! Surely he started whooping and dancing like a tw&t in, what, the mid-to-late eighties?!

And didn't Hooky supposedly threaten to quit New Order for the Stockholm Monsters as far back as 1982 (am sure this is in Johnson's book, if not one of the others) because he was supposedly fuct off with Barney's onstage (mainly drunk) antics way back then.

Thank heavens we didn't have the internet back then else we could probably google 20 years worth of various people's whinging about the band who still won't let it lie.

Curtis: he danced like a dickhead too. Fact.

0 likes

Bere wrote: Is it truth that people in the US wanted their money back, because they took the video for real, and thought they were a real metal band?

:confused2:

0 likes

I thought everyone knew touched by the hand of god was comedy:rofl: maybe the satire was lost on America.. :laugh:New order can be a right laugh :music:

0 likes

Well, apparently some of us thickos don't understand a parody when they see one either?! I mean, the comment I originally wrote at the top of the page was that Barney was trying out for a part in Sigue Sigue Sputnick, given the hairstyle he'd adopted at the top (did SSS make it across to the US, I dunno??). Do I need to put a disclaiming footnote: Barney never did, to the best of my knowledge, ever attend an audition to become a band member within Sigue Sigue Sputnick. The photo is indeed an out-take from the Touched video, which apparently, I've now been led to believe, was a parody?! Well, blow me down, and I genuinely thought they'd grown their hair out and were going through their heavy metal phase at that time??! You live. And learn.

0 likes

So Barney doesnae have an ACE tattoo then :scratch:

0 likes

Can anybody be certain that Barney's antics on Jonathon Ross were not a piss take. Big Al J is spot on again - NO still have that "couldn't give a fcuk" attitude they always have had, and we love them for it.

0 likes

Bere wrote: Is it truth that people in the US wanted their money back, because they took the video for real, and thought they were a real metal band?

Hooky has told this story but it's a joke. The Touched by the Hand of God video was rarely played by MTV here and New Order didn't play live in the States until over a year after this single was released.

0 likes

Lunatic Fridge wrote: Can anybody be certain that Barney's antics on Jonathon Ross were not a piss take.

Clearly, you've never watched the 511 DVD. The answer is YES.

Al Jarvis wrote: Well, apparently some of us thickos don't understand a parody when they see one either?! I mean, the comment I originally wrote at the top of the page was that Barney was trying out for a part in Sigue Sigue Sputnick, given the hairstyle he'd adopted at the top (did SSS make it across to the US, I dunno??).

Then you should have changed the subject of this thread. You are comparing oranges and lemons now.

0 likes

little boy lost wrote: Then you should have changed the subject of this thread. You are comparing oranges and lemons now.

Jan, to the best of my knowledge Bernard Sumner has NEVER tried out for Sigue Sigue Sputnick. It was a JOKE! That picture was NEVER taken from a Sigue Sigue Sputnick audtion. It ... simply ... NEVER ... happened (to the best of my knowledge).

Next time I'll start a thread with "And people bitched about Jonathan Ross," but then simply add in the text, "And quite rightly too. Bernard is an absolute disgrace because he can't dance and can't sing and he now looks his age. Ian Curtis would be spinning in his grave." That way we can perhaps keep the miserablists amongst us happy. Well, not happy, per se, because miserablists don't do 'happy'. Perhaps just less miserable instead?

Enjoy.

0 likes

Well yes, they have always taken the piss in some way or other, by refusing to play ball in the early days when asked for interviews, refusing to play the accepted game when it comes to releases, promotion etc, doing everything their own way if they felt like it, and to an extent they are continuing to this day along contrary lines by doing the exact opposite of what they always stood by. But, and this is possibly where some people are missing the ironic point a bit, the current cycle of contrary behaviour (i.e. playing the media game) is actually rather sad, and smacks a bit of desperation. Bernard is acting the goat to overkill proportions these days, and this "pisstaking" is now a bit lame.

0 likes

Al Jarvis wrote:

Hans Jugger wrote:

Al Jarvis wrote:

Tarbox23 wrote: .... some folks are no longer laughing with them, but AT them...

Then those folks have missed the point entirely, surely?!

Sorry, but what point have I missed entirely?

That this is New Order with a couldn't-give-a-fcuk attitude. Same attitude they've always had. Same attitude they had when they butchered Blue Monday on TOTP or indeed Barney danced like a gimp on Fine Time. That point.

I think the point is - New Order are no longer in a position where they can have a "couldn't give a fcuk attitude". Years ago they could get away with it, but nowadays they don't have the charisma, the coolness or the songs (Jetstream?!)

0 likes

oldmonkey wrote: Well yes, they have always taken the piss in some way or other, by refusing to play ball in the early days when asked for interviews, refusing to play the accepted game when it comes to releases, promotion etc, doing everything their own way if they felt like it, and to an extent they are continuing to this day along contrary lines by doing the exact opposite of what they always stood by. But, and this is possibly where some people are missing the ironic point a bit, the current cycle of contrary behaviour (i.e. playing the media game) is actually rather sad, and smacks a bit of desperation. Bernard is acting the goat to overkill proportions these days, and this "pisstaking" is now a bit lame.

I'd say people are missing the point because the parody is no longer recognizable as a parody, at which point said parody runs the risk of not being taken seriously anymore, and has the likelihood of alienating the viewer.

0 likes

Hans Jugger wrote: I think the point is - New Order are no longer in a position where they can have a "couldn't give a fcuk attitude". Years ago they could get away with it, but nowadays they don't have the charisma, the coolness or the songs (Jetstream?!)

Soooo, no one's actually forcing you to listen to them these days, are they?! Which is more to the point, surely?!

0 likes

Al Jarvis wrote:

Hans Jugger wrote: I think the point is - New Order are no longer in a position where they can have a "couldn't give a fcuk attitude". Years ago they could get away with it, but nowadays they don't have the charisma, the coolness or the songs (Jetstream?!)

Soooo, no one's actually forcing you to listen to them these days, are they?! Which is more to the point, surely?!

Did they ever? The only thing that ever forced me to listen to New Order was the fact that they made good records, and listening to them was the only way of getting to experience anything to do with them, they were rarely in the press and comparatively rarely appearing live.

0 likes

oldmonkey wrote: Did they ever? The only thing that ever forced me to listen to New Order was the fact that they made good records, and listening to them was the only way of getting to experience anything to do with them, they were rarely in the press and comparatively rarely appearing live.

Not the point I was making, Tim. If someone doesn't like Jetstream why then post continually that they don't like Jetstream? You don't have to listen to New Order anymore because you no longer like their output? People can move on, if they so wish.

As for being rarely in the press, I've got a spare wardrobe of New Order junk at home which doesn't quite bare witness to that.

0 likes

Al Jarvis wrote:

oldmonkey wrote: Did they ever? The only thing that ever forced me to listen to New Order was the fact that they made good records, and listening to them was the only way of getting to experience anything to do with them, they were rarely in the press and comparatively rarely appearing live.

Not the point I was making, Tim. If someone doesn't like Jetstream why then post continually that they don't like Jetstream?

Maybe some people aspire to be a low life or a dead soul? Good point though. There are alternatives these days for those that want them. I guess there always were. Leave your baggage behind, as the sample says!

0 likes

you guys all need to chill out a bit.

skin up a fat one, put Technique on the stereo and feel the love :-)

0 likes

Al Jarvis wrote:

little boy lost wrote: Then you should have changed the subject of this thread. You are comparing oranges and lemons now.

Jan, to the best of my knowledge Bernard Sumner has NEVER tried out for Sigue Sigue Sputnick. It was a JOKE! That picture was NEVER taken from a Sigue Sigue Sputnick audtion. It ... simply ... NEVER ... happened (to the best of my knowledge).

Next time I'll start a thread with "And people bitched about Jonathan Ross," but then simply add in the text, "And quite rightly too. Bernard is an absolute disgrace because he can't dance and can't sing and he now looks his age. Ian Curtis would be spinning in his grave." That way we can perhaps keep the miserablists amongst us happy. Well, not happy, per se, because miserablists don't do 'happy'. Perhaps just less miserable instead?

Enjoy.

Al, if you really think you made me think that Bernard ever tried out for SSS, I'm insulted.

But anyway: by combining your subject line with a picture from the "Touched" video shoot, you effectively suggest that both appearances operate on the same level, quod non. Which brings me back to the point I've made above about the parody: the "Touched" video was/is instantly recognizable as a heavy metal spoof and is consequently hilarious to watch, whereas Bernard's "impersonation" of an over-eager aging rock star hammering it up before his audience to many people makes him look like a berk.

You can probably tell I still haven't fully recovered from the one time I viewed my copy of the 511 DVD.

0 likes

Lunatic Fridge wrote: Can anybody be certain that Barney's antics on Jonathon Ross were not a piss take. Big Al J is spot on again - NO still have that "couldn't give a fcuk" attitude they always have had, and we love them for it.

So you and Al Jarvis like new order because you believe that they don't care about the music (or their fans)?

yes, I will grant you that their backs to the audience mentality and rough interviews and too cool for mainstream attitude was part of their appeal. but just a small PART of it.

the MAIN part of their appeal was that they clearly pour their hearts and souls into their music. their music is not lazy. sometimes the machines would break down, sometimes someone would have too much drink, sometimes they'd be in a lousy mood and put on a crappy live show. sometimes.

they played a phenomenal live show in NYC this month. I love the band. But I love the band because they care about the art of the music, not because they are perceived as lazy or too cool for their fans.

the whole reason I post here and occasionally point out aspects of the band that worries me, is that I love them SO much. a few tough questions about them does not equal hatred for the band. quite the opposite in fact.

you guys sound like the rightwingers who say anyone criticizing the Iraq War must hate the troops, hate the country, should pack up and move out, be ashamed...

so, yeah, if I see a crappy live tv performance, I am gonna call them on it. No, that does not mean new order are finished and will never play live well again... it just means that I love em and want to see them do the best they can.

trying to defend a crappy performance, with "new order are cool cause they suck" like you and aj do, is lame.

yeah, they sucked in the 80s a few times too. so what? nobody is perfect. but that doesn't mean we should worship their bad nights.

the NYC Hammerstein show is one of the best live performances I have ever seen, and I've been to many. Why was that show good? Because they played great music, connected with the crowd, and didn't act like losers. It was a memorable night.

This Ross show was memorable for exactly the opposite reasons. A true fan can accept that, can accept that new order can be equally spectacular as shitty live, but never mediocre. Well, Ross was shitty.

Stop making excuses, stop telling us that you like new order because they suck, because they "don't care". They DO care. They don't go up on a stage and TRY to suck. So stop worshipping the band and acting like they never mess up, that the only times they mess up "they meant to do that"...

Get real.

0 likes

i can admit that new Order are slowly decaying while still loving their music. it's not tough. they have moments of beauty and moments of shame, nowadays in near equal parts. they've always been terrible musicians but were able to construct some magic in the studio and could stir emotions on stage despite their technical shortcomings. the performance on JR is just another example of them not being good "live". it may be fun to be there but when you're at home listening or watching a live performance, you better have your ear plugs and your book of excuses ready.

0 likes

Al Jarvis wrote: Remember when Barney tried out for Sigue Sigue Sputnick?! :skeptic: :laugh:

Don't ask me why I though of this this morning, but it's ironic that they actually wrote a song called Sputnik at the same time... :evil4:

0 likes

You're leaving NewOrderOnline

This link goes to an external website we don't operate, which has its own privacy policy and terms.

Destination:
Continue ↗