Originally posted by Taboo # 7
> Originally posted by Green> > > > Originally posted by Taboo # 7> > > > > > > Originally posted by Grigory Rasputin, the mad mystic of Petrograd> > > yes...Rolling Stone sucks....Spin sucks....Tiger Beat sucks..come to think of it...I can't think of any music magazine available on a widespread basis here in the states that doesn't suck...hey Tabsy...maybe we could start a magazine that doesn't suck....Brian could probably help as well...hmmm....Nic, we would, of course, give your website free advertising!!!!!> > >
I contributed a couple of three-to-four paragraphs to that New Order fanzine that someone posted about a while back, but I don't want to turn into the next Greil Marcus. I got his book Lipstick Traces because I thought it'd be interesting. Boy was I wrong!
Spin's okay, Alternative Press is slightly better, RS sucks, but Tiger Beat has really been making a comeback with their "Pop Stars exposed!" new articles. I would have never known Britney and that dude from Nsuck were going out if I hadn't read the hard-hitting interview in TB.
Gotta admit that I have Lipstick Traces. Have never read the whole book, just parts of it. Boy is it ever a bit over the top.
England's Dreaming is a lot better at explaining the whole Punk explosion, it really captures the moment best. John Lydon's autobiography should be required reading when the whole class struggle issue comes up in History classes. Otherwise, there's very few books that capture the impact of Punk and don't try to minimize it. Lipstick Traces may have some relevant passages, but going on and on about obscure art movements that had no impact is a bit pretentious.
john lydons no blacks no irish etc? that one?
yeah - gives a slightly different spin to malcom mclarens spoutings....