Skip to content

the power of B-sides

Archived

18 replies · 776 views

This is an archived legacy thread. Replies are closed, but the discussion is preserved.

..."Behind closed doors"..."Don't do it"..."Lonesome tonight"..."1963"..."Best & marsh"...

Have you ever thought about why bands very often put some of their best work on b-sides ???

Is it because they feel free from any commercial pressure (if there is) ??? Is it a "do what you like it's only a b-side" attitude ???

Is it because they can experiment, can do things that they wouldn't normally do if there were working on an album-track or a single ???

Why "Slow Jam" instead of "Behind Closed Doors" on "Get Ready" ???

What do you think ???

0 likes

Shame Of The Nation!

0 likes

Marco - NO wouldn't put 1963 on the B-side of True Faith these days, if they could see the potential of a big seller it just wouldn't happen. Back in the naive 80's they would be doing it for the love of the music and to a lesser extent the fans, but now, its money money money.

Behind Close Doors is an exception, in the fact that they really needed to put a good first CD after 8 years to get the kids excited. Saying that, I don't think BCD is a patch on 1963, Shame of the Nation, Don't do It etc. etc.

Marco, should you be making comments on a song we 'both' haven't heard yet? - not that I would doubt you breaking our pact.

(Keep the Faith)

0 likes

i won't break the pact :D

"Slow Jam" was one of two i listened at spinner.com

But i didn't visit this evil page the last few days, so i'm very resistant...

0 likes

I too have a confession. I became weak during the night and clicked on the www.newordergetready.com site to have a sneak at Turn My Way and 60MPH they've got up there for free.

Alas! - it wouldn't work on my birds home computer so I'm still pure.

Still have not listened to anything but the 30 second samplers.

Its getting very, very exciting.

0 likes

Oooh.... I see dead threads :skeptic:

0 likes

Must be invisible powers.

0 likes

I can't argue with any of that.

0 likes

the message is far too long to read with the eyes; this is why it must be absorbed through osmosis.

0 likes

I think Marco should share his amazing disappearing thread content recipe with us!

0 likes

Given that it is from Aug. of 2001, NOOL hadn't even hatched me yet. :evil4:

0 likes

LE Roberts wrote: Given that it is from Aug. of 2001, NOOL hadn't even hatched me yet. :evil4:

You were a mere twinkle in the register user links eye.. ooer!! :evil4:

0 likes

If you try and quote them, you'll be able to actually see what they were saying on here. :nod:

0 likes

You were a mere twinkle in the register user links eye.. ooer!!

Given that I trolled for awhile before registering, I figure my gestation period here was about 12 months. I was breech, though - a real bastard to get out. :evil4:

0 likes

NObabe wrote: If you try and quote them, you'll be able to actually see what they were saying on here. :nod:

:thumb: Handy that

0 likes

:eek: :scratch: :skeptic:

0 likes

Maybe the titles and links had to be removed because John Denver's people decided to sue again? ;)

0 likes

Huntsman wrote: Marco - NO wouldn't put 1963 on the B-side of True Faith these days, if they could see the potential of a big seller it just wouldn't happen. Back in the naive 80's they would be doing it for the love of the music and to a lesser extent the fans, but now, its money money money.

Behind Close Doors is an exception, in the fact that they really needed to put a good first CD after 8 years to get the kids excited. Saying that, I don't think BCD is a patch on 1963, Shame of the Nation, Don't do It etc. etc.

Marco, should you be making comments on a song we 'both' haven't heard yet? - not that I would doubt you breaking our pact.

(Keep the Faith)

Oh yeah, so they do apppear! :laugh:

0 likes

You're leaving NewOrderOnline

This link goes to an external website we don't operate, which has its own privacy policy and terms.

Destination:
Continue ↗