Unable to watch this Friday, just finished it. Can’t understand some of the objections to this version of the Passion Play. Not a believer, but have heard this stuff before so here’s an agnostic’s view.
All forms of art can be challenging, engaging, entertaining, educational (albeit not necessarily at the same time). This was a bold idea, if not entirely original, even if it did involve the presence of Keith Allen, one of the most, erm, un-endearing of men.
The oft-repeated “greatest story ever told” means less today than it used to so what’s the problem in presenting it in a modern context? Even taking the a-bit-too-populist-for-my-taste step of including the lyric of Angels with its gender transfer from “she” to “he offers me protection…”.
Whatever you may have thought of the singing - it was live, after all, though Tim Booth’s octave-jump was a mistake - the use of carefully-selected lyrics at appropriate times was pretty good. Juxtaposing “we’re changing our ways, taking different roads, love will tear us apart” and Jesus’ announcement that “one of you will betray me” was quite moving.
Peter’s extracts from I Am The Resurrection were similarly apposite (using the chorus here would have been ridiculous, of course, and it was obviously reserved for more appropriate use later anyway) as was the “how does it feel…” sequence between Jesus and Judas.
As for Jesus singing “I couldn’t bring myself to hate you, as I’d like”…..un-Christian? Sure he’d like, as a man, but not as the son of God. Turning the other cheek is central to Christian belief, no?
Guess most of you will have moved on to more interesting stuff by now.....