Ok Ok 1963 Doesn't Suck!

Archived

9 replies · 297 views

This is an archived legacy thread. Replies are closed, but the discussion is preserved.

← Back to Digital Republic

10 posts

5 May 2006, 17:47

It just has no Peter Hook and sounds extremely effeminate.....

That better?

5 May 2006, 19:04

this doesnt require another thread :nono:

5 May 2006, 21:20

You're such an idiot! Gosh!

6 May 2006, 01:24

Point is...... :shrug:

6 May 2006, 02:53

never really thought much of it, but im listening to the Arthur Baker remix right now, and i rather enjoy it!

6 May 2006, 03:00

Who is Joe Gill? wrote: never really thought much of it, but im listening to the Arthur Baker remix right now, and i rather enjoy it!

The original from the TF 12" is the better version. Have to say that All the remixes though are complete shite!

6 May 2006, 10:37

[magenta]shedmonite61[/magenta] wrote: You're such an idiot! Gosh!

oh yeah...napoleon's in the house! :abovelol:

6 May 2006, 11:06

I like quoting from that film.

6 May 2006, 14:57

I think you've got a narrow idea of what gender is supposed to be if you're whining about what's "effeminate" and whatnot. I think we are all, as humans, mentally androgynous, and are capable of being both masculine and feminine. To me, gender isn't something that's fixed.

6 May 2006, 15:06

leather_girl wrote:

To me, gender isn't something that's fixed.

Isn't there a brand of slug that changes gender during intercourse?

Are you a slug, leather girl?