Well, allow me to butt in and throw in my twopenne'thworth, but The Stone Roses - for the relatively short time they were "at the forefront of the scheme of things" - were probably the most ridiculously over-hyped band Britain has ever seen.....and that debut album, fine though it is, suffered from a frankly tedious overkill of hyperbole and accolades completely out of proportion to its actual contents....merely a passable - if somewhat derivative - 60's-psychedelic-influenced collection of songs, and nothing much else.... it's certainly NOT the groundbreaking opus everyone makes it out to be.
With all that kind of hysteria to live up to, is it any wonder the band found it hard to maintain any kind of momentum in its wake?? Everyone knows what happened next....they simply couldn't live up to all the expectations and surpass the (supposedly) high standards they set themselves with that initial high benchmark, so the only way was down..... My personal opinion only, but I absolutely detested "Fools Gold" so imagine my shock when the single after that ("One Love") was even worse....!
So, I certainly wouldn't nominate The Stone Roses as the best album ever, nope, I'd have to say that "Low Life" by New Order is TEN TIMES better - and more groundbreaking - than TSR could ever hope to be and even then I couldn't say it was the best album EVER in the whole wide world.....cos that would just be fucking stupid wouldn't it?
God, these tedious lists! Why do people keep bothering with this kind of lark? How many variations on the same theme must we have to keep taking week in week out?? Are people's memories really so short now? I mean - all it bascially amounts to is these fucking critics - or the public - being allowed back into the same room as before and simply rearranging the same few pieces of furniture into a different order so to speak - so that every one of these TOP!! 20!! ULTIMATE!! BEST!! EVER!! ALBUMS!! OF!! ALL!! TIME!! get to have a turn at number one..... groan....yawn.....zzz...zzz....zzzz
