Kevin Smith wrote:
Doctor? wrote:
Hands up who has a 24bit CD player?
Thought not.
Snake Oil!

You're the bugger who spends more on hi-fi kit than I would on studio gear though aren't you?
;)
Still they're rare, most PC's should play it though.
And to the other chap, yes I belive SACD supports 24bit. All you get for your extra 8 bits is another 48dB of signal to noise ratio. 24bit is usually also sampled at 96Khz, adding more than an octave to the top of the frequency range (presumably in case your dog wants to listen, cos YOU sure as fuck can't hear up there), and doing all sorts of cool nyquist-related stuff to the stuff you can hear lower down (reduced aliasing/ring modulation, that sort of thing).
But what was the original source material?
Was it a 24bit 96khz all digital mixer dumping straight to disk? In 1985? was it FUCK!, maybe an early portable digiral recorder working to 16bit 44.1 or 48khz. And as for the BBC stuff from what 81 and 82?..smelly old 1/4" ampex 456 that's over 25 years old, and has been "cared for" by the BBC....who can do wonders in getting genius ON to a tape....then leave it down the back of a radiator. At that age, it will need to have been in a proper tape safe or will be print-through city (likely quite bad even IF kept well), and the binding on the oxide is likely so degraded it'll play once and kill itself, leaving the tape machine needing sand blasted.
Will it sound "better" than the original??? hmmmmm subjectively maybe it will, but not as good as it would sound if it had really been made to that specification. Will there actually be something new added to it, brought out from the original? No. you cannot replace what has gone. You can try to shove it back in with effects, but it's just synthesis and distortion, nothing to do with hearing more of what New Order played.