Skip to content

Hooky's book too controversial?

Archived

10 replies · 1,001 views

This is an archived legacy thread. Replies are closed, but the discussion is preserved.

This book,along with Hookys new band will probably never see the light of day. Both projects have been a work- in- progress since the last ice age.:rolleyes:

0 likes

Feel free to ignore them both when they do surface then :thumb:

0 likes

Ha - I missed this on MySpace. It's a cracking read.

Bless Hooky for leaving the right amount of XXXs in the names.

"180 Would XXX complain about the allegation of taking ecstasy – again not the most serious allegation but still nevertheless an illegal drug?"

Ha ha - there's only one three-letter names pillhead in Manchester!

0 likes

...and only one XXXXXX who now takes herself seriously.

Love it!

0 likes

Diamond 383 wrote: Ha - I missed this on MySpace. It's a cracking read.

Bless Hooky for leaving the right amount of XXXs in the names.

"180 Would XXX complain about the allegation of taking ecstasy – again not the most serious allegation but still nevertheless an illegal drug?"

Ha ha - there's only one three-letter names pillhead in Manchester!

Joe?

0 likes

Comrade Shampanyov wrote:

Diamond 383 wrote: Ha - I missed this on MySpace. It's a cracking read.

Bless Hooky for leaving the right amount of XXXs in the names.

"180 Would XXX complain about the allegation of taking ecstasy – again not the most serious allegation but still nevertheless an illegal drug?"

Ha ha - there's only one three-letter names pillhead in Manchester!

Joe?

Who's he?

0 likes

Exactamundo!

0 likes

Diamond 383 wrote: Ha - I missed this on MySpace. It's a cracking read.

Bless Hooky for leaving the right amount of XXXs in the names.

"180 Would XXX complain about the allegation of taking ecstasy – again not the most serious allegation but still nevertheless an illegal drug?"

Ha ha - there's only one three-letter names pillhead in Manchester!

wasn't it like 'ecs' was the 'drug' of choice back in the day. :eek: :eek: :eek: so, if "everybody" took, why write about it? how hypocritical!!!! :nuts: :laugh:

0 likes

That's the point of the lawyer's letter, if you read it all. Someone who's spent his whole life boasting about his own drug abuse could still sue someone for libel if they wrote about it.

Rule 1 - don't ever expect anything that a lawyer says to make any sense.

0 likes

i always wondered why biographies never included any of the fun stuff, about what went on behind the scenes.

now i know.

once the lawyers are done with this book, it will be totally lame.

come on hooky, do the right thing and ignore their advice!!!!

0 likes

You're leaving NewOrderOnline

This link goes to an external website we don't operate, which has its own privacy policy and terms.

Destination:
Continue ↗