If Peter Hook keeps threatening legal action against New Order for continuing on without him or whatever keeping New Order from going on, or any behind closed doors bullcrap, should New order change their name but not really. Why don't they call themselves "N3w Ord3r". It's still new order but Peter can't do any legal action. That's an idea for them.
Dates
· UTC
Band name
Archived7 replies · 9,115 views
This is an archived legacy thread. Replies are closed, but the discussion is preserved.
← Back to Digital Republic
8 posts
Just posted something similar myself. New Order Now is fine with me. They need to do something to shut this sadness down.
· edited
UpDownTurnAround wrote: Just posted something similar myself. New Order Now is fine with me. They need to do something to shut this sadness down.
No need to change name now, surely. Hooky has even toned down his rhetoric.
In case you clowns didn't get it, my post above was 54RC45T1C.
I don't get why people think that bands need to change their name when a member leaves. The Beatles, The Rolling Stones, The Cure, Echo and the Bunnymen, heck I can't think of any band other than U2 off the top of my head that has the same membership as when they started...
