Originally posted by a very small boy
> Originally posted by Benny's Cobweb EYES-UH !!!> I'm not convinced he was a genius. Sure, he wrote some lyrics that had far more to say and imply than many of his contemporaries, but that's as far as it goes. He couldn't sing without the assistance of technology, particularly live. If anyone was a genius in Joy Division it was Barney, who has become one of the finest songwriters of his generation.
I remember a previous thread when you said that if Barney had died instead of Ian then JD/NO would have turned into a sad underground poetry collective. That statement intrigued me and I have been trying to re-evaluate my opinions on the whole Ian/Barney/genius debate ever since. If the word tunewriters was substituted for songwriters then I have no arguments but song is a combination of tune and words but is Barney a wordsmith? I am still to be entirely convinced.
I think he is, in his own way, moreso now than in the early days, when he seemed to try and emulate the Curtisian ambiguity. Some of his lyrics are plaintive and beautiful - there's a naive almost childlike quality to some of his best stuff. Absolutely no doubting his incredible creative talent though, to me he is right up there with Elvis Costello as one of the finest songwriters I've ever had the pleasure of listening to.