Skip to content

Confusion '83 x Confusion '87

Archived

51 replies · 10,525 views

This is an archived legacy thread. Replies are closed, but the discussion is preserved.

What's yer pick?

Closed
  • Arthur Baker's produced original 1983 version 44 (75%)
  • 1987 version included on 'Substance' 15 (25%)

59 votes · voting closed

Tony Wilson was right: the original version is far superior, even if Barney had the flu the day he sang it.

0 likes

I kinda like them both.

0 likes

The 1983 version!

0 likes

The 87 version is closer to the live version, so I have to go with that.

:bass: Barney vs. Hooky on bass :bass:

0 likes

Can't pick right now. Too sober at the moment (See thread on Alcoholism FMI) to make a good choice. Must....drink....more.

But I am kinda-almost-psuedo-maybe-possibly leaning towards the 87 version. :shrug:

0 likes

The '87 version. The original isn't bad, but it's too muddy and Barney's vocals are kind of whacked. But, the video isn't bad.

0 likes

Confusion 83

Too drunk to remember why it wasn't included on Substance.....but easily the best!

0 likes

Original!!

0 likes

The original every time.:thumb:

0 likes

BAKERMAN for me............:wink:

0 likes

Played the 83 version to death, so that's the one I prefer.

0 likes

83 version for me but the video edit. Quite liked the 92 version though. Hated the 87 version. It didn't work IMO.

0 likes

83 version..raw,hard and brutal.

however imo horrible live :nonono:

0 likes

Original version. I especially enjoy the Sting impression Bernard did when he belts out "you caused me some problems, you've taken my place."

How many other bands would say "fook it, let's do it, damn the singer's cold."

I cannot think of any other song in which the singer is so ill it effects the recording.

0 likes

'83 for me-- how it was imagined when it was written :thumb:

0 likes

The 1983 version is far superior to the 1987 mix. the remix/re-recorded version is good,but FAC 93 beats it hands down.

0 likes

Does anyone take Tony Wilson seriously? The man thought Shaun Ryder was the next Yeats :nuts::nuts::nuts:

0 likes

83 version

Ryder was the next eddie yates

0 likes

Never been a big fan of the 87 version,but did like the WWRL sample at the start.

0 likes

The original version stands the test of time IMO

0 likes

The original pisses on the version on substance.

It was a classic electro track which summed up the period.

I was very disapointed with the version on substance. And dont get me started on the version of temptation on it.:cry:

0 likes

Originally posted by This blue-eyed boy that wants to be Does anyone take Tony Wilson seriously? The man thought Shaun Ryder was the next Yeats :nuts::nuts::nuts:

Don't be silly! Bono is the next Yeats! :ignore: :p

0 likes

What is the big deal about the '83 version? I know that people are entitled to their own opinions, but the original version sounds so muddled. Then again, I might be biased, since I heard an "acapella" version of Confusion '83, and the vocals were horrid.

0 likes

Original. There is no question about it.

0 likes

The '87 version for me; I think the original's horrible.

0 likes

Only heard one version - the one on Substance. :scratch:

Can someone provide a link to the other one please?

0 likes

I think that the original is in the Retro boxset. Otherwise, make an appeal to The Savior...(strong fooking hint, The Savior)

Funny you should should ask...my first post in NOOL was an inquiry if the orignial Confusion was available on cd.

Personally, I am annoyed with the song, especially if it is on a bootleg, I am a live Order junkie now. Too ambitious of a project, sounds like shite live most of the time. I like the lyrics but the song is all disjointed and awkward.

0 likes

I like em all.:thumb:

0 likes

You're leaving NewOrderOnline

This link goes to an external website we don't operate, which has its own privacy policy and terms.

Destination:
Continue ↗