Skip to content

1963 - original or '94

Archived

32 replies · 3,737 views

This is an archived legacy thread. Replies are closed, but the discussion is preserved.

We all know its a top song, but which one do you prefer? I love the bass on the best of version.

0 likes

The question deserves at least one reply!

I agree - the addition of the bass makes the latter version better. But I also like the intro better and also that they added a proper ending. The slow fadeout with the song still playing is something I hate - it makes even a great song end on a sour note, or is that not end because it keeps going?

0 likes

Always, in everything, only the original ;)

0 likes

original

0 likes

The original.

0 likes

The original defintely, although 94's not bad. I remember several reviewers suggesting it was a better song than True Faith when the pair were first released. Definitely their best ever b-side!

0 likes

My vote: ORIGINAL.

0 likes

Original, perfect companion to True Faith...those sequencer lines still give me chills

0 likes

i'm with wasim and eric on this one. the prominence of hooky's bass in the 1994 version makes the latter an improvement on the original.

0 likes

AgentWood wrote: i'm with wasim and eric on this one. the prominence of hooky's bass in the 1994 version makes the latter an improvement on the original.

True, but I prefer the fade out on the original. Makes it more complete.

0 likes

original - full respect...

That said Hooky's bass line is dope...

0 likes

AgentWood wrote: i'm with wasim and eric on this one. the prominence of hooky's bass in the 1994 version makes the latter an improvement on the original.

Same here!

0 likes

Obviously the '95 Arthur Baker remix.

It change a song I didn't like to a song I like a lot...

Hooky's bass is sooo good on that remix, it changed the full thing.

0 likes

Original is good, but 94-version is even better.

0 likes

I like the original version better. The one that I heard first was the 94 version and that made me cry.(not the version itself; it's just that 1963 seems to be a really sad and emotional song.) However, when I listened to the original version, I liked the original better.

0 likes

for whatever twisted reasons i have, i think the original carries a more angry tone than the '94 remix. both are genuine. i likes both! :nod:

0 likes

i like all the versions,but my fav is the 95' version.

0 likes

I prefer original version :clap:

0 likes

Original please.

0 likes

Original version I don´t like The 95 version!!!:\ohwell:

0 likes

Always the original!

0 likes

Original. First time I heard 1963 was on the Substance sides cassette that came out shortly after Substance. Almost too perfect of a b-side. I remember reading that Hooky and Sumner jokingly forgot what was on the "b-side to 1963". Both tracks were produced by Hague and they both carried a tone of hope, yet despair. Even though they sounded alike in parts, those two original compositions remain forever in my very new order time capsule.

"I will always feel for you..."

0 likes

The original one! :idea:

0 likes

original for me.

:smoking:

0 likes

ORIGINAL!

0 likes

Original. The longer an NO song is the better. I like how the keyboard fits into the melancolic atmosphere of the song.

0 likes

Played 1963 more than True Faith when it was released. I much prefer the original, if some of the bass from the remix was thrown in that would make it perfect.

0 likes

original version..

0 likes

I normally prefer the original, but here I like the 1994 version. It jazzed up a pretty good song, for me. Maybe it helps that I didn't much care for this song when I first heard it, but I grew to like it while listening to it on "Best of"...

0 likes

Arthur Baker all the way. Hooky makes it so much better

0 likes

You're leaving NewOrderOnline

This link goes to an external website we don't operate, which has its own privacy policy and terms.

Destination:
Continue ↗