Clayhead Liberation Faction wrote:
She bites, she bites!! From the footage I saw at the weekend it seems quite a few of the Arse fanbase also dislike bread, Bonz!! Wot, no panini???!!?
Of course, you're right - if it had been a similar situation involving Stoke fans and a high-profile former player things would have turned out the same in terms of reaction from (what we once used to call) the terraces. My point is less about Arsenal fans (usually such a placid bunch, no?!) and more about the logic here. Adebayor certainly deserves serious a boot up the arse for violent conduct and a firm slap on the wrist for his "incendiary" goal celebration, but that hardly excuses the Arsenal fans for turning into a bunch of demented violent baboons, does it?? There was provocation, sure, but that's context - not an excuse.
Again, if it was Stoke the situation would have been as hostile, if not worse. However, I would speculate that if it had been Stoke - what with our long-term reputation for 'football-related disorder' and all - the authorities would be handing out banning orders for individual fans left, right and centre rather than simply saying "it was all the player's fault - he incited them".
Go figure.

When I say i hate bread, I mean I hate it!
I know what you're saying, I see where you're coming from. I'm not saying that banning orders should not be given, where necersarry and fans can't be held responsible for their behaviour, but really how bad was it? - i wasn't there, but I saw it on MOTD and can imagine how I would have felt watching him run up to me while my team were losing. I would not have thrown anything, but i'd be lying if I said there have not been moments in football in my 25 years that have not enraged me and a few choice words not fallen from my mouth.
If he had not run up there, would it still have happened? Probably not. You've forced me to try and find footage on youtube but i can't find any decent footage of the Arsenal fans except this;
And although there's no excusing any violence, to me, and i've seen a fair few nasty moments in football - i'd say, minus the throwing of objects, that it's a minority rattled few pushing forward and ranting their rage - I mean, in comaprison to say..............
One organised, one not. Violence, racial abuse all unacceptable and deserve a banning, and we all take responsibility for our individual actions - but we also know, human behaviour is not rational, especially when it comes to footy. To me, the Arsenal thing was more a an angry rage in a football moment rather than an attempt to incite real violence at a football game. I'm not saying though, that certain individuals may not desreve a banning order for events that happened.
Come on, even you've got to say by placid Arsenal's standards, it's hardly rock and roll of football violence, is it?