patrick stewart appreciation society wrote:
this is very true,i do enjoy a commentary as long as the peopel do them are interested in doing it - take Rob Reiner for instance on stand by me - God that was painful to listen to he just sounds so bored.
I don't like it when commentarys are sliced together like T2:ultimate edition, Seven, and one flew over the cuckoo's nest.
But i think Michael Mann is the king of the directors commentary the guy is just a fountain of info, why he did what he did, the look of the character, his motivation for doing a certain thing in the film ,the whole theory behind the story etc, a under-rated genius in my opinion
Yes yes yes, I hate the spliced-together commentary! 
How much cost-efficent would it be just to get the people who want to talk about the film together so they can have an actual conversation? 
Oh, if you haven't listened to the commentary on "Anchorman", you must. It's hilarious (they even bring in Lou Rawls at one point, for a very bizarre conversation) 
Okay...I know I'm going to get ragged for renting "Love Actually", but not only did I rent it...I watched it with the commentary by Bill Nighy, Hugh Grant, et al. Very funny stuff 
The one movie I'd have loved to have a commentary, but didn't? Why, it's the one I've been quoting with this little fella last night:

C'mon, you know Landis isn't doing anything! What was Bluto's motivations, Landis? Tell me! 