FAO Moderators

Okay, here is one of the guidelines from the Comunity Standards:

Respectfulness – We expect our member to show respect for others. Respecting their person, their musical tastes, their time and their opinions – even if you disagree with them.

Liam launched into an unprovoked attack on my favourite band, which I didn't like, so I started my own thread which was promptly locked up because i "broke the rules" so to speak.

Why has his thread not been locked when it CLEARLY breaks the above guideline? It doesn't make sense and it's not fair that he can get away with launching a crap argument against a great band when he's clearly in the wrong. Explain please.

Just forget about it and stop getting riled over it.

Cos it aint what you do, or how you do it round here. It's who yer "IN" with. Don't you know this website is the only reason NO stay together man...it's vital...you can'tbe going against the almighty NOOL Junta.

PPL have been treating you like shit since day one mate and no one's said BOO to them.

If your face don't fit, you get the shit.

their musical tastes

told you ....selective rules.

I would have thought breaking a guideline would mean a locked thread, and he broke one.

me calling him a wanker or something is also an opinion, maybe he's the best guy in the world, and you said opinions are allowed.

is there a guideline for calling someone names? Okay so i was out of line, but how am i gonna react when someone says my favourite band are shit for no reason, and then his argument is non existent.

NEW ORDER ARE SHIT, that's why we love em

"Digital Mike Binoche" wrote: NEW ORDER ARE SHIT, that's why we love em

ya got that right :D

I wonder which of the two singers would be judged shite by a singing tutor? LOL

Shug just resigned as a moderator, and when The Pope tried, he bited the dust and unfortunatly we haven't seem him in a while...

Well I have offered my services and appear to be the peoples favourite, plus I'm on every day to check on the posts.

Diggy Mike, the Voice of reason

well it's been made massively clear to me by several people, both on their own behalf and speaking for others....that I am not in the least welcome here. So that should make the clean up go easier.

Only stickin around cos I already worked so hard on C2 tunes.

Jack_H wrote: is there a guideline for calling someone names? Okay so i was out of line, but how am i gonna react when someone says my favourite band are shit for no reason, and then his argument is non existent.

Point out that his argument is nonexistent, and therefore, (IMPLY that) he is a wanker.

Ya gotta get creative, Jack/son. Use humor, I mean humour. Take the piss. Make him look like a wanker without ever saying he's a wanker.

Kids.

yeah but sometimes implying stuff sucks

Jack_H wrote: yeah but sometimes implying stuff sucks

Eh, don't get lazy on us. Take the piss, it's more fun than a shouting match. Use yer native intelligence. It's good exercise.

And way more effective than trading accusations of being bell-ends.

Steve Campbell wrote: well it's been made massively clear to me by several people, both on their own behalf and speaking for others....that I am not in the least welcome here. So that should make the clean up go easier.

Only stickin around cos I already worked so hard on C2 tunes.

I think you should stick around because some people here want you to stick around. It's not as if you're that bell-end JSB, izzit? :D

You know Jack, that old cnut Comrade is actually right.

WISDOM OF AGES

only messin' Blue

You takin' the piss? Bee-otch.

Jack_H wrote: yeah but sometimes implying stuff sucks

Hhhmmmmm. Cheap. Polite though ... on occasions.

played man

well said shug after all this is BEHIND CLOSED DOORS

How to take the piss. Lesson 1.

Liam (known Tory): "Pearl Jam are shite."

Jack/sontwatto: (known Pearl Jam afficionados): "Granted, they're no Skrewdriver."

Comment: Liam is taking the piss by slagging Jack/sontwatto's favorite band; note that his attack on Jack/sontwatto is indirect. Jack/sontwatto responds by implying that Liam is a Skrewdriver afficionado; again, an indirect attack.

Beats all hell outta "You're a bell-end." "No, you're a bell-end."

If Mike promises NOT to wear anymore Hawaiin t-shirts at gigs, I would consider voting for him.

Oh ok then!

jack/sontwatto?????????

Sorry, Jack/son AND Twatto. :D

No shug, it wasn't at you in particular, or even at the mods, so much as te general vibe round here. It's turned into some fucking western saloon (albiet the pianny player knows ceremony).

And as for a few jars? LOL not likely.

Steve Campbell wrote: It's turned into some fucking western saloon (albiet the pianny player knows ceremony).

Surely no reason to get outta Dodge?

Jack_H wrote: Okay, here is one of the guidelines from the Comunity Standards:

Respectfulness – We expect our member to show respect for others. Respecting their person, their musical tastes, their time and their opinions – even if you disagree with them.

Liam launched into an unprovoked attack on my favourite band, which I didn't like, so I started my own thread which was promptly locked up because i "broke the rules" so to speak.

Why has his thread not been locked when it CLEARLY breaks the above guideline? It doesn't make sense and it's not fair that he can get away with launching a crap argument against a great band when he's clearly in the wrong. Explain please.

boo fookin hoo. All i've heard all day of you is fucking crying and moaning and complaining. "somebody doesnt like my favourite band " yer little tag line says "I Love pearl jam, and odnt care if you dont." Then why start crying like a little baby?