Queen Elizabeth Throws Panties at Tom Jones...:uhoh:

...and invites him back to her place for a knighthood!

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060329/ap_en_mu/tom_jones_4

Submit your own clever knock on a Jones classic here :p

Sorry, Tabsy, but there is nothing remotely clever about Tom Jones' songs...

What's new pussycat? She's a lady Sex Bomb....NOT

Come on, you can put it in a box and wrap it up, but it's still sh*t.

"I love being a queen and I have always been a royalist," Jones said after the investiture.

Wow, who would have thought of that?

Comrade Shampanyov, Last Gentleman of the Mohicans wrote: "I love being a queen and I have always been a royalist," Jones said after the investiture.

Comrade Shampanyov, Last Gentleman of the Mohicans wrote: "I love being a queen and I have always been a royalist," Jones said after the investiture.

all this sycophantic bullshit. bring on the republic.

Surely that should have been:

Tom Jones is Pants and so is Queen Elizabeth...

Snorri xxx

NOOLigan wrote: all this sycophantic bullshit. bring on the republic.

No way....Liz only has 2 functions.....

1. Extract money from moron tourists. (and I truly think the royals MUST bring in more than they make off the civil list, could be wrong tho).
2. in THEORY, stop an insane prime minister starting a war.

I mean if she was making laws and stuff I'd object, but she's just a nice old German lady who scams yanks.

Steve Campbell wrote:

NOOLigan wrote: all this sycophantic bullshit. bring on the republic.

No way....Liz only has 2 functions.....

1. Extract money from moron tourists. (and I truly think the royals MUST bring in more than they make off the civil list, could be wrong tho).
2. in THEORY, stop an insane prime minister starting a war.

I mean if she was making laws and stuff I'd object, but she's just a nice old German lady who scams yanks.

how much money does the uk taxpayer contribute towards maintaining one of the richest families in the uk if not the world?

the queen only acts on advice of her prime minister. only in the event of a deadlock in parliament may she intervene.

need i remind you that in wwii both italy and japan were monarchies. all those people who think that having a monarch somehow strengthens their political system are just kidding themselves.

They cost a LOT less than the bad arms debts of a hundred dodgy dictators that the UK taxpayer has underwritten to pay off, and they do extract wealth from idiots.

FWIW she doesn;t even advise the PM. Not that anyone could advise fuckin tony bush.

Steve Campbell wrote: They cost a LOT less than the bad arms debts of a hundred dodgy dictators that the UK taxpayer has underwritten to pay off, and they do extract wealth from idiots.

FWIW she doesn;t even advise the PM. Not that anyone could advise fuckin tony bush.

you misread. the monarch only acts on advice of the prime minister.

NOOLigan wrote:

Steve Campbell wrote:

NOOLigan wrote: all this sycophantic bullshit. bring on the republic.

No way....Liz only has 2 functions.....

1. Extract money from moron tourists. (and I truly think the royals MUST bring in more than they make off the civil list, could be wrong tho).
2. in THEORY, stop an insane prime minister starting a war.

I mean if she was making laws and stuff I'd object, but she's just a nice old German lady who scams yanks.

how much money does the uk taxpayer contribute towards maintaining one of the richest families in the uk if not the world?

We make more off them than we spend on them. They generate huge tourism revenue.