Post Counts :shrug:

burn the muthafookers

you've been known to post some huge totals in your time as well.

It's not so black and white now is it.... I mean there are people here with many thousands of worthwhile posts, then twats like me who have 50% worthy and 50% UTTER shite (debate the figures if you feel you must ;) ), but there are also those who have n000 posts of little or no value, purely because they are chasing a post count.

I've seen a few fora with a can't post for 5 mins after posting thing...might be a plan here? tho it would doubtles depress MICK and MIKE. :D

NOOLigan wrote: you've been known to post some huge totals in your time as well.

He's been known to post horsecrap by the panamax shipload. :D

But I do not object.

NOOLigan wrote: you've been known to post some huge totals in your time as well.

errrr, you're missing the point......again

Barney Army wrote:

NOOLigan wrote: you've been known to post some huge totals in your time as well.

errrr, you're missing the point......again

Ron has a degree in point missing ;)

Your beef is with them being some form of incentive to talk shite yes?

Steve Campbell wrote: Your beef is with them being some form of incentive to talk shite yes?

sort of, amusing shite is great.

24hr word association

EDIT: actually, just shoot Ron & Cozzie and everything is fine

Barney Army wrote:

Steve Campbell wrote: Your beef is with them being some form of incentive to talk shite yes?

sort of, amusing shite is great.

24hr word association

well i have never resorted to quoting myself, or had my threads removed. i think i am fairly harmless,as most of us are. this is BCD and just about anything goes. if you don't like it, then you know what you can do, and i'm not implying anything rude here.

Barney Army wrote:

Steve Campbell wrote: Your beef is with them being some form of incentive to talk shite yes?

sort of, amusing shite is great.

24hr word association

EDIT: actually, just shoot Ron & Cozzie and everything is fine

damnit we need to fix Cozzie....she's looking at a life of bake offs and PTA meetings otherwise ;)

What about acting as everyones internet surfer? Just copying and pasting links that most people will have seen anyway. And then quoting yourself and adding your opinion!

Drop the counts, watch the wankers fuck off.

Why does anyone give a toss about the counts anyway? The more counts the more you need to get a life!! :\ohwell:

Uncle Liam wrote: What about acting as everyones internet surfer? Just copying and pasting links that most people will have seen anyway. And then quoting yourself and adding your opinion!

Drop the counts, watch the wankers fuck off.

Bzzzzt wrong...wont get rid of ME :D Nowt wrong with the odd interesting link, I've not read the whole internet yet ( waiting for the film actually)

Fay wrote: Why does anyone give a toss about the counts anyway? The more counts the more you need to get a life!! :\ohwell:

which is why they should be removed.

I dont want everyone to see what a sad twat I am

Here's what I would do. Keep the post counts for display on an individual's profile (which others could only see if the member had chosen to make their profile visible), but remove them from the public display alongside the poster's name etc.

Post counts have caused quite a few problems over the years, but now we have a few prats deliberately trying to inflate their totals by persistantly posting mindless shite (you are lucky I ain't the site owner, you'd have been binned by now), the suggestion above makes most sense. Those who are proud of their totals can either sit in a lonely place and wank over how many posts they have managed, or can just choose to make their profile available to others by selecting the relevant option. Those who don't care needn't bother.

Barney Army wrote:

Fay wrote: Why does anyone give a toss about the counts anyway? The more counts the more you need to get a life!! :\ohwell:

which is why they should be removed.

I dont want everyone to see what a sad twat I am

But your picture's up on yer C2 profile

Barney Army wrote:

Fay wrote: Why does anyone give a toss about the counts anyway? The more counts the more you need to get a life!! :\ohwell:

which is why they should be removed.

I dont want everyone to see what a sad twat I am

Who's Counting ?

Steve Campbell wrote:

But your picture's up on yer C2 profile

I aint embarassed about my head :D

That's your head?????

Delete my POST, CUNT!

I say lose the post counts!

i'll moan as to why later when i have more time (and as an excuse to bump up my post count by 1 more! )

Al Jarvis wrote:

Technically, I'm permanently logged in at work, I don't choose to log in/out all the time.

Same here.

It's a tricky one this...

If we want NOOL to survive we need people to come visit and post on it; post count 'reward' titles motivate visitors.

I may have a warped logic here, but the way I see it, NOOL's survival helps NO's survival in some small way as well; the band know that the fans are active and passionate... and if they wanted to, they can see what we're thinking....

A lot of Kerrrrrap! gets posted- the only way to avert this is to kill, or limit access to Behind Closed Doors... but that would also damage the community...

Best thing may be for us to all ignore what we don't like...

I used to just come here to read the news; I never thought I would be approaching 2K's worth of posts, but posting on NOOL is a good bit of fun when you've nothing better to do... I just don't know how you would limit the crap-

Maybe thread creation should be moderator controlled; i.e. you can't put up a new thread until a moderator has pre-approved it; but would the moderator's be up for that kind of increase in workload?

Al Jarvis wrote: Get rid of the login count first. That doesn't even make sense. Mine, at last count, said 12k or something which, in 4 years, means I've logged in here 10 times a day or something. Which ain't quite true, I just work in browsers all day long and constantly switch between them which inflates my login count artificially. Technically, I'm permanently logged in at work, I don't choose to log in/out all the time.

yup, my Opera opens NOOL among others when it's run, and stays running for how ever many weeks the machine stays booted for.

Craig W wrote: It's a tricky one this...

If we want NOOL to survive we need people to come visit and post on it; post count 'reward' titles motivate visitors.

I may have a warped logic here, but the way I see it, NOOL's survival helps NO's survival in some small way as well; the band know that the fans are active and passionate... and if they wanted to, they can see what we're thinking....

A lot of Kerrrrrap! gets posted- the only way to avert this is to kill, or limit access to Behind Closed Doors... but that would also damage the community...

Best thing may be for us to all ignore what we don't like...

I used to just come here to read the news; I never thought I would be approaching 2K's worth of posts, but posting on NOOL is a good bit of fun when you've nothing better to do... I just don't know how you would limit the crap-

Maybe thread creation should be moderator controlled; i.e. you can't put up a new thread until a moderator has pre-approved it; but would the moderator's be up for that kind of increase in workload?

Aye, no amount of wank I see posted here raises more than a momentary "FFS" and fear for the bugger responsible.Nothing other than people being personally nasty to each other and meaning it really registers on me at all. I made myself deeply unpopular here by being too gobby, so I quitened down a bit, dunno how much good it did, but I aint out to make enemies in life ;)

I find it a little hard to see how any amount of shite is bad in THIS forum, because it is the "backroom bar" if you will, Ceremony and DR should be bullshit free by and large.

Anyway I think OldMonkey's idea of removing post counts from the posts themselves would be a good idea because it would remove tem as a bragging pice but still allow secret gloating, for those who like that sort of thing.

Al Jarvis wrote:

Craig W wrote: Maybe thread creation should be moderator controlled; i.e. you can't put up a new thread until a moderator has pre-approved it; but would the moderator's be up for that kind of increase in workload?

No offence, but I think this is an awful idea. I certainly wouldn't post here anymore if I had to go cap in hand to someone to get what I wanted to post cleared first.

I wouldn't like this either... just brainstorming an extreme conclusion...

I think things are fine the way they are all round- This is a cracking website and if people think a thread is rubbish; just ignore it- it's only a bit of fun!

Could we have a feature whereby you can ignore all posts by a certain user, sort of an Owens Button?

(No offence CO, just that your name had a better ring to it than Shampanyov....)

Fair point though.

oldmonkey wrote: Could we have a feature whereby you can ignore all posts by a certain user, sort of an Owens Button?

(No offence CO, just that your name had a better ring to it than Shampanyov....)

Hmmm. Interesting.

Christopher Owens wrote:

oldmonkey wrote: Could we have a feature whereby you can ignore all posts by a certain user, sort of an Owens Button?

(No offence CO, just that your name had a better ring to it than Shampanyov....)

Hmmm. Interesting.

I think "cozzie switch" mightbe a better term....tho you are welcome to use "campbell device" as well.

A plonk button....how very quaint, almost like the real internet :D

Well, I'm using the occasion of my 9,000th post to say...I need to get out more

But seriously, the idea of getting rid of posts counts is good in theory (like Communism), but it won't work. As much as there are certain people here who are only here to up their post counts, there are others who like to talk to folks across the world and see how much time they could've put to better use. When you've got an international forum where freedom of speech (to an extent, so long as you're not a dick to everyone around you) is a given, you're going to have people abuse it.

I remember when I first started here, I'd keep tabs of my post count and mark each new landmark ("100 posts! Yeah") with some lame-ass comment on how much I felt like I'd "done" something because I had 2,000 posts, 3,000 posts, etc. I compared it to kill counts that WWII aces accumulated (yes I am that lame)...but then when you get into the 6,000th time you've had your sexuality questioned because you bring up David Hasselhoff in every posts, you start to see that you might have a problem.

Would it be a deterrant to all the shite talk here? For a little while, yeah. But then there'd be some other measure for how much crap you can post here. So...I guess I'm on the side of "might work for a while, but doubt it's permenant"

I hope I've spent my 9,000th post well

Shug wrote:

Spotnick wrote: Well... we debated this over the years did we?

But Tim, to be honest.. this forum was created so all the crap can go here instead of the main forum, so that was the idea

But even the biggest crap poster then (Shug not to name him) resigned moderating this forum.

Cheers fer NOT naming me Nicos. Me resigning shows how much standards have dropped recently ;)

Too many fcukin fruitcakes wanting to to talk politics and religion (threads which were always going to end in personal attacks and insults - even if the original post was harmless). I don't mind some of the messenger type threads if they are amusing and others get involved, but that doesnae happen very often. Patrick & Huntsman were the masters for those type of threads

I still drop by here, but it's far less frequent these days.

Wait what? You'd rather have garbage "Hi How are you" and "check your email threads" than debate? That seems crazy. Debate about politics religion sports etc is all part of the internet...sadly enough.

It's certainly the signal in the low signal to noise ratio in this forum.

Spotnick wrote: Well... we debated this over the years did we?

But Tim, to be honest.. this forum was created so all the crap can go here instead of the main forum, so that was the idea

But even the biggest crap poster then (Shug not to name him) resigned moderating this forum.

Many people used this forum as an alternative for instant messaging, as long as it's still on topic and not disruptive... I don't really mind. But it also means less people will read them. I barely read 1 of 20 threads on here.

And seriously, does the post count have really any value? I'm seriously not proud of mine and wish it would be 10 times lower than it is

I'm about 6 posts away from not posting anymore... But yeah.. post count is important to the people who are "trashing" the forum.

When it's people complaining about being off topic versus people being off topic I 99% of the time side with the latter, especially in an off topic forum.

But now that I understand that what, for the most part, people are complaining about are the conversation threads, I have to agree.

Links from the internet, political, religious, and sports discussions, posts for advice, sharing events in your life, etc etc.. that's what an off topic forum is about. Not "check your email" and other conversations

when i get up some sunday afternoon's may post count has somehow risen without me knowing how

El Jarvo wrote:

Steve Campbell wrote: Anyway I think OldMonkey's idea of removing post counts from the posts themselves would be a good idea because it would remove tem as a bragging pice but still allow secret gloating, for those who like that sort of thing.

Surely there's no-one here though who could possibly gloat about a postcount?! Speak up if there is. Only thing with postcounts is that it does suggest some sort of longevity. And I've certainly seen, say, Mike change his name before, or Jeff, and thought 'oh, a new poster' then clocked their count and realised it's just a name change. Er, which I've also just done.

dude, cozzie and missy jem (whom I'm not attacking here) have bragged about post counts, and there's tons of "I'VE DONE IT!" posts when people reach 1000 or somat, and they all tend to be in a very short amount of time

Woah there, that was back in the bad old days, but in case you hadn't realised i do like to take the piss quite a lot. I'm very rarely a top poster these days. Too busy. I couldn't give a fuck if anybody could see my count anyway. If i was bothered i'd be on the computer at night as well!

I can sympathize with the folks who seem to get a thrill out of seeing their post counts climb, but I'm well past the point where I choose to make a big deal of it :D

Say, did I mention that I just hit 9,000?

Anyway, it's easy to get carried away when you're first getting into the "groove" of NOOL (or any message board, for that matter). It's a bit like the Algonquin Round Table of internet bickering and kvetching, if anyone today knew what the hell the Algonquin Round Table was :p

But once you go through the "trial by fire" of being the guy/gal that everyone loves to hate, if you stick around you find that this is a community of people who might not always say it, but generally care about you. They might not always like you, but they'll acknowledge your existence as a worthy contributor if you bring something to the table. If you're just going on about whatever bowel movement you had today, you'll get run out pretty quickly

As evidenced by my tenure, I've been around long enough to know that there are "slow periods" on this site, and certain people who are currently annoyances just happened to get on a streak at times like now when there's not a whole lot going on. It's thawing out from winter for most folks, and looking forward to summer (when it's too hot to go outside and you might as well shoot bollocks on the net all day). Once you get that initial "ohmigod, I really have something to say!" stage, you become a better person for it.

Or you become a drunk :beer2:

So let's all take a breather from "Mrs. Cozzie and the Vicious Circle" and remember that in the real world, world leaders are misleading us into wars that aren't justified, celebrities are forcing their bullshit religious ideas on us, and *someone* closed my thread about Wacko Jacko yesterday. Compared to all that...this is really just so much sound and fury

Did I mention that I now have 9001 posts?

I ignore ALL of Shugs football threads, because all he does is talk shite and spit the dummy out when his rival team wins!

Post counts should still be used. Aside from measuring achievement from going to the next level, it gives me a measure of safety of who my audience is. In other words, it's better than myspace or chat because it's safer.

Speaking of which:

Cozzie, if that is your real name, what exactly do you know about New Order? And what do you like about them?

My comment was actually aimed at Chrissmari for dragging my name into it. My reason for using this forum is just for having a laugh to break the monotony of my day up. I think real reason nobody mentions NO on here much is because there's a few other forums for NO stuff.

Life's too short innit

[magenta]Missy Jem[/magenta] wrote: My comment was actually aimed at Chrissmari for dragging my name into it. My reason for using this forum is just for having a laugh to break the monotony of my day up. I think real reason nobody mentions NO on here much is because there's a few other forums for NO stuff.

Life's too short innit

you talk enough shite to break my day up and all Missy ;)

Uncle Liam wrote: Speaking of which:

Cozzie, if that is your real name, what exactly do you know about New Order? And what do you like about them?

NO has changed my life. What started me to be a NO fan from a Nirvana fan was the purchase of International in Oct. 2005, shortly after my college life began. Before then, I knew that the group came with "Blue Monday" first before Orgy. I was stunned by the lyrics, profound and ambiguous. Also, I downloaded Joy Division's LWTUA from the Donnie Darko Soundtrack. According to a fact on the Real Player, NO was derived from JD. So the group who did BM also did JD, Sweet...

Anyway, there a many things I like about NO. Their lyrics have double meanings most of the time. It's the only group that I don't mind listening to long songs. They give a technological and human faces to rock.

NO is the model for any modern band. Etc.

Changed your life? I dont think i've ever heard anything quite so pretentious! And it was International? Bloody Hell.

it's quite simple. Ignore what you want. People's nonsense doesn't bother me unless its not properly titled. If you must have a tesco thread properly put it in the thread title. I find 90% of threads follow this.

Politics, sports, and bullshit are part of everyday conversation. Why should BCR be any different? ISn't that purpose of this forum?

About International, Liam: I got it from a used record store in Chapel Hill. International was a starter. Then when I went to other record stores in college, that's was when I started building my JD/NO collection. Except for Movement, I got the rest of their albums with. Also got CD's for JD, Electronic, compilations such as Substance. DVDs include New Order Story, Collection, 316, 511, and 24 HPP.

I know!

Uncle Liam wrote: Changed your life? I dont think i've ever heard anything quite so pretentious! And it was International? Bloody Hell.

it's easy for your life to be changed at 19 by something like that.

Hell a sneeze can change your life at 19

[brown]alistair[/brown] wrote:

I think we all have our little group of NOOL mates we've made over the years and I bet we all chat to them regularly enough via IM or e-mail. I just don't see the point of clogging up the board with pointless FAO messages nobody gives a shit about or using the board as a slow IM chat.

This isn't intended as a reply to Alisatir, just using his post as a starting point...

But how do you meet NOOL mates? The main reason I started posting was beacuse, believe it or not, having lurked for a while, I wanted to get involved with the community and get to know some people who shared not just a love of NO, but in many other cases, interests in sport, humour, etc. Things change, and I'm sure back in the old days you did have to post a lot (but over a longer time) to get to know people and established, and I'm sure a lot of that talk was about NO, but that shouldn't mean that it becomes a closed shop and noone else can get involved - with BCD it makes it easier to post a lot in a shorter space of time, than if everything had to be NO-related... Is it bad because it's different or bad because it's bad? I ignore anything about films, formula 1, a lot of politics stuff, but I am interested in what people are listening to, silly threads (that are clearly labelled) when I've got time to spare and above all NO when I have something to say, which right now is obviously not that often...

[brown]alistair[/brown] wrote: I log onto BCD each day and there's fifteen new Pearl Jam threads (Jack's a good lad I'm sure, but he's overdoing it and it's just tedious now) or Garden Shed threads which I definitely missed the in-joke on.

Only 10 people have so far voted in this poll - far less than people have contributed to the discussion - is this really about post counts? 90% of the time it should be easy to ignore anything in BCD that doesn't interest you, if threads are properly titled, so ignore them, ignore the forum if you must... The Shed threads will die soon anyway... :)

I'm really not bothered about post counts, but I don't think people should be censured for posting on BCD just because some people don't find the posts amusing or relevant... I've deliberately tried to avoid lots of posting recently because I don't want to be lumped in with the 'Pariahs'... I'd like to get to know people, be a part of this, but because I'm relatively new, I don't want to step on anyone who's been here longer's toes...

Thank you for your time,

Snorri xxx

Snorrimon wrote:

[brown]alistair[/brown] wrote:

I think we all have our little group of NOOL mates we've made over the years and I bet we all chat to them regularly enough via IM or e-mail. I just don't see the point of clogging up the board with pointless FAO messages nobody gives a shit about or using the board as a slow IM chat.

This isn't intended as a reply to Alisatir, just using his post as a starting point...

But how do you meet NOOL mates? The main reason I started posting was beacuse, believe it or not, having lurked for a while, I wanted to get involved with the community and get to know some people who shared not just a love of NO, but in many other cases, interests in sport, humour, etc. Things change, and I'm sure back in the old days you did have to post a lot (but over a longer time) to get to know people and established, and I'm sure a lot of that talk was about NO, but that shouldn't mean that it becomes a closed shop and noone else can get involved - with BCD it makes it easier to post a lot in a shorter space of time, than if everything had to be NO-related... Is it bad because it's different or bad because it's bad? I ignore anything about films, formula 1, a lot of politics stuff, but I am interested in what people are listening to, silly threads (that are clearly labelled) when I've got time to spare and above all NO when I have something to say, which right now is obviously not that often...

[brown]alistair[/brown] wrote: I log onto BCD each day and there's fifteen new Pearl Jam threads (Jack's a good lad I'm sure, but he's overdoing it and it's just tedious now) or Garden Shed threads which I definitely missed the in-joke on.

Only 10 people have so far voted in this poll - far less than people have contributed to the discussion - is this really about post counts? 90% of the time it should be easy to ignore anything in BCD that doesn't interest you, if threads are properly titled, so ignore them, ignore the forum if you must... The Shed threads will die soon anyway... :)

I'm really not bothered about post counts, but I don't think people should be censured for posting on BCD just because some people don't find the posts amusing or relevant... I've deliberately tried to avoid lots of posting recently because I don't want to be lumped in with the 'Pariahs'... I'd like to get to know people, be a part of this, but because I'm relatively new, I don't want to step on anyone who's been here longer's toes...

Thank you for your time,

Snorri xxx

Not doing yourself any favours by being a West Ham fan, mate!

Only kidding

Snorrimon wrote:

But how do you meet NOOL mates?

90% of the time it should be easy to ignore anything in BCD that doesn't interest you.

I'd like to get to know people, be a part of this, but because I'm relatively new, I don't want to step on anyone who's been here longer's toes...

Three interesting points:

You meet NOOL mates by turning up to gigs and certain other events. There's usually fair warning and everyone knows where, when and sometime has access to phone numbers in case they get lost.

90% of the time it SHOULD BE easy to ignore things that are of no interest to you, but recently it has not been. Any thread that may interest you is normally on page 2, having been pushed there by all the identical threads that don't interest you at all.

Even threads that are of interest or entertainment lose their sheen after the sixtieth one in the same day.

It's nice to hear someone say that they don't want to step on anyone's toes - most new people on here seem to want to step on them as hard as they can.

Maybe Shug's critisism in starting this thread should not be taken as an insult, but a reminder that there are others on here who feel pushed out by the dominance of a few.

It's pissing me off as much as anyone else, as Shug knows very well. I don't want to get involved in a slanging match, just want everyone to post with a little more consideration.

Please?

Bonzette wrote:

Snorrimon wrote:

This isn't intended as a reply to Alisatir, just using his post as a starting point...

But how do you meet NOOL mates? The main reason I started posting was beacuse, believe it or not, having lurked for a while, I wanted to get involved with the community and get to know some people who shared not just a love of NO, but in many other cases, interests in sport, humour, etc. Things change, and I'm sure back in the old days you did have to post a lot (but over a longer time) to get to know people and established, and I'm sure a lot of that talk was about NO, but that shouldn't mean that it becomes a closed shop and noone else can get involved - with BCD it makes it easier to post a lot in a shorter space of time, than if everything had to be NO-related... Is it bad because it's different or bad because it's bad? I ignore anything about films, formula 1, a lot of politics stuff, but I am interested in what people are listening to, silly threads (that are clearly labelled) when I've got time to spare and above all NO when I have something to say, which right now is obviously not that often...

I'm really not bothered about post counts, but I don't think people should be censured for posting on BCD just because some people don't find the posts amusing or relevant... I've deliberately tried to avoid lots of posting recently because I don't want to be lumped in with the 'Pariahs'... I'd like to get to know people, be a part of this, but because I'm relatively new, I don't want to step on anyone who's been here longer's toes...

Thank you for your time,

Snorri xxx

Not doing yourself any favours by being a West Ham fan, mate!

Only kidding

Er, thats flying a bit close to the wind isnt it??

Snorri, you said it all.... I've made some really good friends on Nool and there is a real community here despite the efforts of some real miserable gits to be found on a couple of the other threads right now!

But you've still got FA chance in the FA Cup

remove the "top" posters in the last 24 hours. it's not a contest. invariably they are not top posts.

EDIT - I mean remove the section of the website that lists the "top" posters of the last 24 hours, i am not advocating their extinction.

Bit harsh HIBSTER.Give them a FAIR trial before SHOOTING them.BTW please get rid of those COMMUNITY POINTS.

ChrissMari wrote:

Uncle Liam wrote: Changed your life? I dont think i've ever heard anything quite so pretentious! And it was International? Bloody Hell.

it's easy for your life to be changed at 19 by something like that.

Hell a sneeze can change your life at 19

I sincerely hope you support Man Yoo sporting eric the king as an avatar

DoN wrote:

ChrissMari wrote:

Uncle Liam wrote: Changed your life? I dont think i've ever heard anything quite so pretentious! And it was International? Bloody Hell.

it's easy for your life to be changed at 19 by something like that.

Hell a sneeze can change your life at 19

I sincerely hope you support Man Yoo sporting eric the king as an avatar

OI-don't HIJACK this GREAT thread. THREAD THE READ or RED the THREAD

Get rid of the posters names also ?

Bonzette wrote:

Snorrimon wrote:

[brown]alistair[/brown] wrote:

I think we all have our little group of NOOL mates we've made over the years and I bet we all chat to them regularly enough via IM or e-mail. I just don't see the point of clogging up the board with pointless FAO messages nobody gives a shit about or using the board as a slow IM chat.

This isn't intended as a reply to Alisatir, just using his post as a starting point...

But how do you meet NOOL mates? The main reason I started posting was beacuse, believe it or not, having lurked for a while, I wanted to get involved with the community and get to know some people who shared not just a love of NO, but in many other cases, interests in sport, humour, etc. Things change, and I'm sure back in the old days you did have to post a lot (but over a longer time) to get to know people and established, and I'm sure a lot of that talk was about NO, but that shouldn't mean that it becomes a closed shop and noone else can get involved - with BCD it makes it easier to post a lot in a shorter space of time, than if everything had to be NO-related... Is it bad because it's different or bad because it's bad? I ignore anything about films, formula 1, a lot of politics stuff, but I am interested in what people are listening to, silly threads (that are clearly labelled) when I've got time to spare and above all NO when I have something to say, which right now is obviously not that often...

[brown]alistair[/brown] wrote: I log onto BCD each day and there's fifteen new Pearl Jam threads (Jack's a good lad I'm sure, but he's overdoing it and it's just tedious now) or Garden Shed threads which I definitely missed the in-joke on.

Only 10 people have so far voted in this poll - far less than people have contributed to the discussion - is this really about post counts? 90% of the time it should be easy to ignore anything in BCD that doesn't interest you, if threads are properly titled, so ignore them, ignore the forum if you must... The Shed threads will die soon anyway... :)

I'm really not bothered about post counts, but I don't think people should be censured for posting on BCD just because some people don't find the posts amusing or relevant... I've deliberately tried to avoid lots of posting recently because I don't want to be lumped in with the 'Pariahs'... I'd like to get to know people, be a part of this, but because I'm relatively new, I don't want to step on anyone who's been here longer's toes...

Thank you for your time,

Snorri xxx

Not doing yourself any favours by being a West Ham fan, mate!

Only kidding

Ahh Bonzette, at last our paths cross on a post...

what an exciting game last night, that late strike from Forsell really spiced up the relegation battle and Birminghams win against Blackburn has kept them in the race for survival!

hibster wrote: remove the "top" posters in the last 24 hours. it's not a contest. invariably they are not top posts.

Either that or change the title to "Top ten most annoying gobshites in the last 24hrs"

.

I just spent the past 10 mins trying to think of a really smart comment to say to you about United, and you beat me to it!

:p

Bacon Sandwich wrote: Get rid of the posters names also ?

over reacting a tad mike!

over reacting a tad mike!

Just trying to have a laugh really

Bacon Sandwich wrote:

over reacting a tad mike!

Just trying to have a laugh really

You should be BANNED for that mate!

Bonzette wrote:

I just spent the past 10 mins trying to think of a really smart comment to say to you about United, and you beat me to it!

:p

:p

Shug wrote:

ghost rider wrote:

One last bit, why doesn't anybody get irritated at the many football threads? I am not bothered by them, but it may be bullshit to some.

Cos that was one of the founding reasons this forum was created, when there was only Digital Republic, Nicos got fed up with us posting about footy. Most of the people who have been posting since the start are all football fans.

And Liam, I've said it before, yer a cunt.

quite harsh. I remember having a little spat with you, but i thought it was quite benign. We made nice through email, right? As for Liam, i really dont remember.Quite possible, as he sometimes can be confrontational.

Anyhow, Im sure that many people on this site dont consider me a cunt.

My, we're all building up our post counts :)

[magenta]Missy Jem[/magenta] wrote: My comment was actually aimed at Chrissmari for dragging my name into it. My reason for using this forum is just for having a laugh to break the monotony of my day up. I think real reason nobody mentions NO on here much is because there's a few other forums for NO stuff.

Life's too short innit

I agree Missy. I find the forum is good for stress relief as I hate my job at the moment, and this gives me a bit of a different outlet. Also, I don't have many other people to talk to who are interested in NO and I am able to find out info about NO here that I wouldn't necessarily hear about otherwise.

Spotnick wrote:

I think it will be removed in the next release, that and the fact that the last topics will only be about the "on-topic" forums.

That's a great idea. I bet it's occasionally quite daunting to get to the first page and see some of the BCD thread titles.

The first page is, amongst other things, an advert to newcomers to the site!

Lose the number of posts next to each message posted, but keep the post ranks there, as a bit of a compromise - that way people who really care can see roughly how many messages someone has posted and feel proud of their rank, without it being so explicit as to exactly how many messages have been posted... Lose the Top Posters thing as well, but above all realise that if you're relatively new to NOOL (like me) you can't just come in and hijack everything, repesct those who have been here longer, but also for those who have been here a while, realise that things do change - some of the "in the good old days" comments sound like grandparents comlaining about their grandchildren's taste in music or clothes, etc. - just because things were different in the beginning doesn't mean they should stay like that - maybe 1000 posts was a real achievement once upon a time, now it's not - some people seem to covertly really care about newbies posting lots, because it belittles their own post count?

Snorri xxx

Keep the forum, keep the post counts.

Bar access to BCD for those with under 500 posts If quality control is what people are bothered about and NOOL can survive a drop in activity.

Snorrimon wrote: Lose the number of posts next to each message posted, but keep the post ranks there, as a bit of a compromise - that way people who really care can see roughly how many messages someone has posted and feel proud of their rank, without it being so explicit as to exactly how many messages have been posted... Lose the Top Posters thing as well, but above all realise that if you're relatively new to NOOL (like me) you can't just come in and hijack everything, repesct those who have been here longer, but also for those who have been here a while, realise that things do change - some of the "in the good old days" comments sound like grandparents comlaining about their grandchildren's taste in music or clothes, etc. - just because things were different in the beginning doesn't mean they should stay like that - maybe 1000 posts was a real achievement once upon a time, now it's not - some people seem to covertly really care about newbies posting lots, because it belittles their own post count?

Snorri xxx

I agree with all of that, apart from the last sentence, I reckon thats way off the mark

9/10

Fair enough, guys, it was just a thought - I was trying to imaine what I'd feel like if I had been here since the start only to be confronted by the current situation - maybe I secretly care about post-counts more than I think... I wasn't suggesting that that was the case with everyone, but maybe for some part of the whole - "it was better in the old days" thing, sort of "I earned my post-count the hard way, these youngsters don't know they're born"! EDIT: Never thought of it like that before, Al, probably because I would never dream of doing so - I think seeing how much time needs to be spent on here even to post 1000 meassges of shite, I respect anyone who has a high post count - I do think some newbies are a little inconsiderate in how they treat the fora...

Probably is way off the mark... Back to the shed for a bacon sandwich...

Snorri xxx

[magenta]Missy Jem[/magenta] wrote: My comment was actually aimed at Chrissmari for dragging my name into it. My reason for using this forum is just for having a laugh to break the monotony of my day up. I think real reason nobody mentions NO on here much is because there's a few other forums for NO stuff.

Life's too short innit

(that's a scream not a yawn)

I said it wasn't a friggin attack. That's just the first I remember of people comparing post counts was when you first joined.

Jesus christ.

Snorrimon wrote: I think seeing how much time needs to be spent on here even to post 1000 meassges of shite, I respect anyone who has a high post count - I do think some newbies are a little inconsiderate in how they treat the fora...

Probably is way off the mark... Back to the shed for a bacon sandwich...

Snorri xxx

it's about three weeks these days isn't it?

I have opened a BCD Official SILLY Thread, hope that is allowed. One thread for all the silly stuff.

It really is easy, people who wanna post daft stuff on one thread ONLY can, and people who wanna avoid Daft stuff know where it is and have nothing to complain about.

Diggy Mike - The Vocie of reason