Post Counts :shrug:
Archived86 replies · 1,593 views
Should Post Counts be deleted?
Closed-
yes - they only serve to increase moronic posts. 11 (65%)
-
no - I am am proud of my post count, and I am a twat. 6 (35%)
17 votes · voting closed
Spotnick wrote: Well... we debated this over the years did we?
But Tim, to be honest.. this forum was created so all the crap can go here instead of the main forum, so that was the idea
But even the biggest crap poster then (Shug not to name him) resigned moderating this forum.
Cheers fer NOT naming me Nicos. Me resigning shows how much standards have dropped recently ;)
Too many fcukin fruitcakes wanting to to talk politics and religion (threads which were always going to end in personal attacks and insults - even if the original post was harmless). I don't mind some of the messenger type threads if they are amusing and others get involved, but that doesnae happen very often. Patrick & Huntsman were the masters for those type of threads ![]()
I still drop by here, but it's far less frequent these days.
oldmonkey wrote: Could we have a feature whereby you can ignore all posts by a certain user, sort of an Owens Button?
(No offence CO, just that your name had a better ring to it than Shampanyov....)
Hmmm. Interesting.
Christopher Owens wrote:
oldmonkey wrote: Could we have a feature whereby you can ignore all posts by a certain user, sort of an Owens Button?
(No offence CO, just that your name had a better ring to it than Shampanyov....)
Hmmm. Interesting.
I think "cozzie switch" mightbe a better term....tho you are welcome to use "campbell device" as well.
A plonk button....how very quaint, almost like the real internet :D
Well, I'm using the occasion of my 9,000th post to say...I need to get out more ![]()
But seriously, the idea of getting rid of posts counts is good in theory (like Communism), but it won't work. As much as there are certain people here who are only here to up their post counts, there are others who like to talk to folks across the world and see how much time they could've put to better use. When you've got an international forum where freedom of speech (to an extent, so long as you're not a dick to everyone around you) is a given, you're going to have people abuse it. ![]()
I remember when I first started here, I'd keep tabs of my post count and mark each new landmark ("100 posts! Yeah") with some lame-ass comment on how much I felt like I'd "done" something because I had 2,000 posts, 3,000 posts, etc. I compared it to kill counts that WWII aces accumulated (yes I am that lame)...but then when you get into the 6,000th time you've had your sexuality questioned because you bring up David Hasselhoff in every posts, you start to see that you might have a problem. ![]()
Would it be a deterrant to all the shite talk here? For a little while, yeah. But then there'd be some other measure for how much crap you can post here. So...I guess I'm on the side of "might work for a while, but doubt it's permenant" ![]()
I hope I've spent my 9,000th post well ![]()
Shug wrote:
Spotnick wrote: Well... we debated this over the years did we?
But Tim, to be honest.. this forum was created so all the crap can go here instead of the main forum, so that was the idea
But even the biggest crap poster then (Shug not to name him) resigned moderating this forum.
Cheers fer NOT naming me Nicos. Me resigning shows how much standards have dropped recently ;)
Too many fcukin fruitcakes wanting to to talk politics and religion (threads which were always going to end in personal attacks and insults - even if the original post was harmless). I don't mind some of the messenger type threads if they are amusing and others get involved, but that doesnae happen very often. Patrick & Huntsman were the masters for those type of threads
I still drop by here, but it's far less frequent these days.
Wait what? You'd rather have garbage "Hi How are you" and "check your email threads" than debate? That seems crazy. Debate about politics religion sports etc is all part of the internet...sadly enough.
It's certainly the signal in the low signal to noise ratio in this forum.
Spotnick wrote: Well... we debated this over the years did we?
But Tim, to be honest.. this forum was created so all the crap can go here instead of the main forum, so that was the idea
But even the biggest crap poster then (Shug not to name him) resigned moderating this forum.
Many people used this forum as an alternative for instant messaging, as long as it's still on topic and not disruptive... I don't really mind. But it also means less people will read them. I barely read 1 of 20 threads on here.
And seriously, does the post count have really any value? I'm seriously not proud of mine and wish it would be 10 times lower than it is
I'm about 6 posts away from not posting anymore... But yeah.. post count is important to the people who are "trashing" the forum.
When it's people complaining about being off topic versus people being off topic I 99% of the time side with the latter, especially in an off topic forum.
But now that I understand that what, for the most part, people are complaining about are the conversation threads, I have to agree.
Links from the internet, political, religious, and sports discussions, posts for advice, sharing events in your life, etc etc.. that's what an off topic forum is about. Not "check your email" and other conversations
Steve Campbell wrote: Anyway I think OldMonkey's idea of removing post counts from the posts themselves would be a good idea because it would remove tem as a bragging pice but still allow secret gloating, for those who like that sort of thing.
Surely there's no-one here though who could possibly gloat about a postcount?! Speak up if there is. Only thing with postcounts is that it does suggest some sort of longevity. And I've certainly seen, say, Mike change his name before, or Jeff, and thought 'oh, a new poster' then clocked their count and realised it's just a name change. Er, which I've also just done.
when i get up some sunday afternoon's may post count has somehow risen without me knowing how ![]()
El Jarvo wrote:
Steve Campbell wrote: Anyway I think OldMonkey's idea of removing post counts from the posts themselves would be a good idea because it would remove tem as a bragging pice but still allow secret gloating, for those who like that sort of thing.
Surely there's no-one here though who could possibly gloat about a postcount?! Speak up if there is. Only thing with postcounts is that it does suggest some sort of longevity. And I've certainly seen, say, Mike change his name before, or Jeff, and thought 'oh, a new poster' then clocked their count and realised it's just a name change. Er, which I've also just done.
dude, cozzie and missy jem (whom I'm not attacking here) have bragged about post counts, and there's tons of "I'VE DONE IT!" posts when people reach 1000 or somat, and they all tend to be in a very short amount of time
Personally, I couldn't give a toss whether the post count stays or goes... and the same goes for Behind Closed Doors to be honest! Occasionally there are some decent threads here but they're few and far between these days.
I think we all have our little group of NOOL mates we've made over the years and I bet we all chat to them regularly enough via IM or e-mail. I just don't see the point of clogging up the board with pointless FAO messages nobody gives a shit about or using the board as a slow IM chat.
Also, certain thread topics have been run into the ground lately... I log onto BCD each day and there's fifteen new Pearl Jam threads (Jack's a good lad I'm sure, but he's overdoing it and it's just tedious now) or Garden Shed threads which I definitely missed the in-joke on.
Don't envy Tim or Jeff their jobs of moderating (seems a dirty word these days so I'll say "looking after") the forum as yer all
![]()
Woah there, that was back in the bad old days, but in case you hadn't realised i do like to take the piss quite a lot. I'm very rarely a top poster these days. Too busy. I couldn't give a fuck if anybody could see my count anyway. If i was bothered i'd be on the computer at night as well!![]()
I can sympathize with the folks who seem to get a thrill out of seeing their post counts climb, but I'm well past the point where I choose to make a big deal of it :D
Say, did I mention that I just hit 9,000? ![]()
Anyway, it's easy to get carried away when you're first getting into the "groove" of NOOL (or any message board, for that matter). It's a bit like the Algonquin Round Table of internet bickering and kvetching, if anyone today knew what the hell the Algonquin Round Table was :p
But once you go through the "trial by fire" of being the guy/gal that everyone loves to hate, if you stick around you find that this is a community of people who might not always say it, but generally care about you. They might not always like you, but they'll acknowledge your existence as a worthy contributor if you bring something to the table. If you're just going on about whatever bowel movement you had today, you'll get run out pretty quickly ![]()
As evidenced by my tenure, I've been around long enough to know that there are "slow periods" on this site, and certain people who are currently annoyances just happened to get on a streak at times like now when there's not a whole lot going on. It's thawing out from winter for most folks, and looking forward to summer (when it's too hot to go outside and you might as well shoot bollocks on the net all day). Once you get that initial "ohmigod, I really have something to say!" stage, you become a better person for it.
Or you become a drunk :beer2:
So let's all take a breather from "Mrs. Cozzie and the Vicious Circle" and remember that in the real world, world leaders are misleading us into wars that aren't justified, celebrities are forcing their bullshit religious ideas on us, and *someone* closed my thread about Wacko Jacko yesterday. Compared to all that...this is really just so much sound and fury ![]()
Did I mention that I now have 9001 posts? ![]()
The whole point of this forum was for us lot having a laugh though Missy - that why we hark back to the old days ![]()
And RE:Chrissi....As moderator I had to read most of the stuff that were in them threads, I have no problem with a proper debate if everyone is sensible and behaves, but on subjects like Politics and Religion it didnae take long for people to spit the dummy and resort to insults and name calling. So yeah, I'd like to see this place go back to the way it used to be. People having a craic! There are several people on here who I choose to ignore - yourself included - I am sure there are several who choose this option with my posts, it's nae skin off my nose.
But I will say that I at least feel part of this community - you will find me at most gigs, and you will also see the stories and pictures on here as well, and I've had the pleasure of meeting up with onliners from all over the world.
It seems to me that quite a few of the people who post mainly on here have rarely mentioned the Order, and yet it's a neworder site. ![]()
I ignore ALL of Shugs football threads, because all he does is talk shite and spit the dummy out when his rival team wins! ![]()
Post counts should still be used. Aside from measuring achievement from going to the next level, it gives me a measure of safety of who my audience is. In other words, it's better than myspace or chat because it's safer.
Speaking of which:
Cozzie, if that is your real name, what exactly do you know about New Order? And what do you like about them?
ChrissMari wrote: dude, cozzie and missy jem (whom I'm not attacking here) have bragged about post counts, and there's tons of "I'VE DONE IT!" posts when people reach 1000 or somat, and they all tend to be in a very short amount of time
I wrote a fcuking essay when I hit a 1000 posts, but that was a rarity in them days!
I never been called Dude before. ![]()
My comment was actually aimed at Chrissmari for dragging my name into it. My reason for using this forum is just for having a laugh to break the monotony of my day up. I think real reason nobody mentions NO on here much is because there's a few other forums for NO stuff.
Life's too short innit ![]()
[magenta]Missy Jem[/magenta] wrote: My comment was actually aimed at Chrissmari for dragging my name into it. My reason for using this forum is just for having a laugh to break the monotony of my day up. I think real reason nobody mentions NO on here much is because there's a few other forums for NO stuff.
Life's too short innit
you talk enough shite to break my day up and all Missy ;)
Uncle Liam wrote: Speaking of which:
Cozzie, if that is your real name, what exactly do you know about New Order? And what do you like about them?
NO has changed my life. What started me to be a NO fan from a Nirvana fan was the purchase of International in Oct. 2005, shortly after my college life began. Before then, I knew that the group came with "Blue Monday" first before Orgy. I was stunned by the lyrics, profound and ambiguous. Also, I downloaded Joy Division's LWTUA from the Donnie Darko Soundtrack. According to a fact on the Real Player, NO was derived from JD. So the group who did BM also did JD, Sweet...
Anyway, there a many things I like about NO. Their lyrics have double meanings most of the time. It's the only group that I don't mind listening to long songs. They give a technological and human faces to rock.
NO is the model for any modern band. Etc. ![]()
Changed your life? I dont think i've ever heard anything quite so pretentious! And it was International? Bloody Hell.
it's quite simple. Ignore what you want. People's nonsense doesn't bother me unless its not properly titled. If you must have a tesco thread properly put it in the thread title. I find 90% of threads follow this.
Politics, sports, and bullshit are part of everyday conversation. Why should BCR be any different? ISn't that purpose of this forum?
About International, Liam: I got it from a used record store in Chapel Hill. International was a starter. Then when I went to other record stores in college, that's was when I started building my JD/NO collection. Except for Movement, I got the rest of their albums with. Also got CD's for JD, Electronic, compilations such as Substance. DVDs include New Order Story, Collection, 316, 511, and 24 HPP.
ghost rider wrote:
One last bit, why doesn't anybody get irritated at the many football threads? I am not bothered by them, but it may be bullshit to some.
Cos that was one of the founding reasons this forum was created, when there was only Digital Republic, Nicos got fed up with us posting about footy. Most of the people who have been posting since the start are all football fans.
And Liam, I've said it before, yer a cunt.
Uncle Liam wrote: Changed your life? I dont think i've ever heard anything quite so pretentious! And it was International? Bloody Hell.
it's easy for your life to be changed at 19 by something like that.
Hell a sneeze can change your life at 19
[brown]alistair[/brown] wrote:
I think we all have our little group of NOOL mates we've made over the years and I bet we all chat to them regularly enough via IM or e-mail. I just don't see the point of clogging up the board with pointless FAO messages nobody gives a shit about or using the board as a slow IM chat.
This isn't intended as a reply to Alisatir, just using his post as a starting point...
But how do you meet NOOL mates? The main reason I started posting was beacuse, believe it or not, having lurked for a while, I wanted to get involved with the community and get to know some people who shared not just a love of NO, but in many other cases, interests in sport, humour, etc. Things change, and I'm sure back in the old days you did have to post a lot (but over a longer time) to get to know people and established, and I'm sure a lot of that talk was about NO, but that shouldn't mean that it becomes a closed shop and noone else can get involved - with BCD it makes it easier to post a lot in a shorter space of time, than if everything had to be NO-related... Is it bad because it's different or bad because it's bad? I ignore anything about films, formula 1, a lot of politics stuff, but I am interested in what people are listening to, silly threads (that are clearly labelled) when I've got time to spare and above all NO when I have something to say, which right now is obviously not that often...
[brown]alistair[/brown] wrote: I log onto BCD each day and there's fifteen new Pearl Jam threads (Jack's a good lad I'm sure, but he's overdoing it and it's just tedious now) or Garden Shed threads which I definitely missed the in-joke on.
Only 10 people have so far voted in this poll - far less than people have contributed to the discussion - is this really about post counts? 90% of the time it should be easy to ignore anything in BCD that doesn't interest you, if threads are properly titled, so ignore them, ignore the forum if you must... The Shed threads will die soon anyway... :)
I'm really not bothered about post counts, but I don't think people should be censured for posting on BCD just because some people don't find the posts amusing or relevant... I've deliberately tried to avoid lots of posting recently because I don't want to be lumped in with the 'Pariahs'... I'd like to get to know people, be a part of this, but because I'm relatively new, I don't want to step on anyone who's been here longer's toes...
Thank you for your time,
Snorri xxx
Snorrimon wrote:
[brown]alistair[/brown] wrote:
I think we all have our little group of NOOL mates we've made over the years and I bet we all chat to them regularly enough via IM or e-mail. I just don't see the point of clogging up the board with pointless FAO messages nobody gives a shit about or using the board as a slow IM chat.
This isn't intended as a reply to Alisatir, just using his post as a starting point...
But how do you meet NOOL mates? The main reason I started posting was beacuse, believe it or not, having lurked for a while, I wanted to get involved with the community and get to know some people who shared not just a love of NO, but in many other cases, interests in sport, humour, etc. Things change, and I'm sure back in the old days you did have to post a lot (but over a longer time) to get to know people and established, and I'm sure a lot of that talk was about NO, but that shouldn't mean that it becomes a closed shop and noone else can get involved - with BCD it makes it easier to post a lot in a shorter space of time, than if everything had to be NO-related... Is it bad because it's different or bad because it's bad? I ignore anything about films, formula 1, a lot of politics stuff, but I am interested in what people are listening to, silly threads (that are clearly labelled) when I've got time to spare and above all NO when I have something to say, which right now is obviously not that often...
[brown]alistair[/brown] wrote: I log onto BCD each day and there's fifteen new Pearl Jam threads (Jack's a good lad I'm sure, but he's overdoing it and it's just tedious now) or Garden Shed threads which I definitely missed the in-joke on.
Only 10 people have so far voted in this poll - far less than people have contributed to the discussion - is this really about post counts? 90% of the time it should be easy to ignore anything in BCD that doesn't interest you, if threads are properly titled, so ignore them, ignore the forum if you must... The Shed threads will die soon anyway... :)
I'm really not bothered about post counts, but I don't think people should be censured for posting on BCD just because some people don't find the posts amusing or relevant... I've deliberately tried to avoid lots of posting recently because I don't want to be lumped in with the 'Pariahs'... I'd like to get to know people, be a part of this, but because I'm relatively new, I don't want to step on anyone who's been here longer's toes...
Thank you for your time,
Snorri xxx
Not doing yourself any favours by being a West Ham fan, mate!![]()
Only kidding![]()
Snorrimon wrote:
But how do you meet NOOL mates?
90% of the time it should be easy to ignore anything in BCD that doesn't interest you.
I'd like to get to know people, be a part of this, but because I'm relatively new, I don't want to step on anyone who's been here longer's toes...
Three interesting points:
You meet NOOL mates by turning up to gigs and certain other events. There's usually fair warning and everyone knows where, when and sometime has access to phone numbers in case they get lost.
90% of the time it SHOULD BE easy to ignore things that are of no interest to you, but recently it has not been. Any thread that may interest you is normally on page 2, having been pushed there by all the identical threads that don't interest you at all.
Even threads that are of interest or entertainment lose their sheen after the sixtieth one in the same day.
It's nice to hear someone say that they don't want to step on anyone's toes - most new people on here seem to want to step on them as hard as they can.
Maybe Shug's critisism in starting this thread should not be taken as an insult, but a reminder that there are others on here who feel pushed out by the dominance of a few.
It's pissing me off as much as anyone else, as Shug knows very well. I don't want to get involved in a slanging match, just want everyone to post with a little more consideration.
Please?