Degrading poll about men

Because I had to make up for the other one...

Also I guess physical preferences in this post too.

don't think it does really. mind you, if i didn't have this "baby's arm", i probably wouldn't say that.

Yes - it matters to the man - never seems to matter too much to the woman tho

I don't think size matters if you know what you're doing, but i do think you need to be of a minimum size. And i'm not saying what that is :p

[magenta]Missy Jem[/magenta] wrote: I don't think size matters if you know what you're doing, but i do think you need to be of a minimum size. And i'm not saying what that is :p

I agree.. mind you my on again off again is 6'6" and it's all in proportion. At first, it was really friggin painful. :(

So I guess it can go either way

[magenta]Missy Jem[/magenta] wrote: I don't think size matters if you know what you're doing, but i do think you need to be of a minimum size. And i'm not saying what that is :p

hehehe, good point. besides there is many other lets say gadgets used in action :p

btw I voted YES

:sex:

ahhh crap

"motion of the ocean not the size of the waves"

"just like the ocean or the sea" will never mean the same again. :(

I'd say nope; one of my worst ever experiences was with a guy that was huge... He was so lazy! Mind you good technique and blessed in the trouser department is a winning combination.

I voted yes - because too big or too long can be painful :( but it is true that you have to know what you're doing more than having the equipment

You can go mountain climbing with all the gear you can find, but it won't do you any good without the knowledge and know-how

in the middle. not too small, but not too big. of course, he's got to have love technique.

depends on the woman you get, some do like a bigger ermmm......some dont care, just want to get it done and dusted if i can say that lol

AgentWood wrote: in the middle. not too small, but not too big. of course, he's got to have love technique.

can you at least say what this middle thing means. do you measure in american or british metrics btw??

Richie Soans wrote:

AgentWood wrote: in the middle. not too small, but not too big. of course, he's got to have love technique.

can you at least say what this middle thing means. do you measure in american or british metrics btw??

i measure in inches. so i'd say no smaller than 6 inches, no larger than 8 or 9.

Motion of the Ocean.. unless youre a loose goose.

tis true, that many a worthy organ hasn't got what it takes to play a Cathedral. :D

Scattermcbrain wrote: You can go mountain climbing with all the gear you can find, but it won't do you any good without the knowledge and know-how

I love that.

AgentWood wrote:

Richie Soans wrote:

AgentWood wrote: in the middle. not too small, but not too big. of course, he's got to have love technique.

can you at least say what this middle thing means. do you measure in american or british metrics btw??

i measure in inches. so i'd say no smaller than 6 inches, no larger than 8 or 9.

i second these measurements

Barney Army wrote: ahhh crap

"motion of the ocean not the size of the waves"

"just like the ocean or the sea" will never mean the same again. :(

me either now

Pat McCrotch wrote:

AgentWood wrote: in the middle. not too small, but not too big. of course, he's got to have love technique.

does that mean knowing how to pop in a Barry White CD???

Barry is good, but give me early 70s Al Green ("still in Love With You record or "Call Me"-his best)

Stevie Wonder is good for love....

Teddy Pendergrass is just for hot sweaty love making....

or The Isley Brothers new cd "Baby Making Music"

Tempted wrote:

AgentWood wrote:

Richie Soans wrote:

AgentWood wrote: in the middle. not too small, but not too big. of course, he's got to have love technique.

can you at least say what this middle thing means. do you measure in american or british metrics btw??

i measure in inches. so i'd say no smaller than 6 inches, no larger than 8 or 9.

i second these measurements

for me it was "hmmm" "hey" "YIkes" and "FAINT"

Scattermcbrain wrote: I voted yes - because too big or too long can be painful :(

haha, it's not how big or long it is, luv ...... It's all about how wild you/him/both are in bed actually. When it hurts, just take it slowly, usually takes no more than one day to recover haha ;-)

Yes, bear in mind, if you've ever had a crap shag - it takes two to tango! You are partly to blame!!

[magenta]Missy Jem[/magenta] wrote: Yes, bear in mind, if you've ever had a crap shag - it takes two to tango! You are partly to blame!!

What is a crap shag??

Dunno, just heard from friends

Dirty boy!