Skip to content

U.S. Soldiers arrested for raping, killing Iraqi woman and her family

Archived

20 replies · 267 views

This is an archived legacy thread. Replies are closed, but the discussion is preserved.

Alleged Rape, Murders in Iraq

By RYAN LENZ, Associated Press Writer 25 minutes ago

BEIJI, Iraq - A group of American soldiers in an insurgent-riddled town allegedly noticed a young Iraqi woman when on patrol and later returned to rape her, according to U.S. officials Friday. In an apparent cover-up attempt, she and three members of her family then were killed and her body was set on fire.

Five U.S. troops are being investigated, a U.S. military official told The Associated Press. It was the sixth known inquiry into alleged slayings of Iraqi civilians by U.S. troops.

The suspects in the killing, which took place in March, were from the same platoon as two soldiers kidnapped and killed south of Baghdad this month, said the official, who is close to the investigation and spoke on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the case.

One soldier was arrested after admitting his role in the alleged attack on the family, the U.S. official said. The official said the rape and killings appear to have been a "crime of opportunity," noting that the soldiers had not been attacked by insurgents but had noticed the woman on previous patrols.

One of the family members they allegedly killed was a child, said a senior Army official who also requested anonymity because the investigation is ongoing. Some of the suspects allegedly burned the woman's body to cover up the attack, the U.S. official said.

In Baghdad, the U.S. military issued a sparse statement, saying only that Maj. Gen. James D. Thurman, commander of the 4th Infantry Division, ordered a criminal investigation into the alleged slaying of a family of four in Mahmoudiya, 20 miles south of Baghdad.

However, the U.S. official said the soldiers were assigned to the 502nd Infantry Regiment. The official told the AP that the suspects were from the same platoon as two slain soldiers whose mutilated bodies were found June 19, three days after they were abducted by insurgents near Youssifiyah southwest of Baghdad.

The military has said one and possibly both of the slain soldiers were tortured and beheaded. The official said the mutilation of the slain soldiers stirred feelings of guilt and led at least one member of the platoon to reveal the rape-slaying on June 22.

According to the senior Army official, the alleged incident was first revealed by a soldier during a routine counseling-type session. The official said that soldier did not witness the incident but heard about it.

A second soldier, who also was not involved, said he overhead soldiers conspiring to commit the crimes and then later saw bloodstains on their clothes, the official said.

Before the soldier disclosed the alleged assault, senior officers had been aware of the family's death but believed it was a result of sectarian violence, the official said.

One of the five suspects has already been discharged for unspecified charges unrelated to the killings and is believed to be in the United States, two U.S. officials said on condition of anonymity because the investigation is ongoing. The others have had their weapons taken away and are confined to a U.S. base near Mahmoudiya.

The allegations of rape could generate a particularly strong backlash in Iraq, a conservative, strongly religious society in which many women will not even shake hands with men who are not close relatives.

The case is among the most serious against U.S. soldiers allegedly involved in the deaths of Iraqi civilians. At least 14 U.S. troops have been convicted.

Last week, seven Marines and one Navy medic were charged with premeditated murder in the shooting death of an Iraqi man near Fallujah west of Baghdad.

U.S. officials are also investigating allegations that U.S. Marines killed two dozen unarmed Iraqi civilians Nov. 19 in the western town of Haditha in a revenge attack after a fellow Marine died in a roadside bombing.

Other cases involve the deaths of three male detainees in Salahuddin province in May, the shooting death of unarmed Iraqi man near Ramadi in February, and the death of an Iraqi soldier after an interrogation in 2003 at a detention camp in Qaim.

The allegations have aroused public anger against the U.S. military presence at a time when the new Iraqi government and U.S. authorities are trying to reach out to disaffected Sunni Arabs to quell the insurgency and calm sectarian tensions.

On Saturday, Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki leaves for a whirlwind trip to Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and the United Arab Emirates to seek support for his national reconciliation initiative, which includes an amnesty for the mostly Sunni insurgents.

Al-Maliki is also expected to brief the Sunni leadership of those three countries on his efforts to deal with the divisions between Shiites and Sunnis. Iraq's neighbors in the Persian Gulf fear sectarian tensions will spill over into their countries, which are dominated by Sunnis but have large Shiite minorities.

On Friday, radical Shiite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr rejected al-Maliki's initiative because it does not include a timetable for the withdrawal of U.S.-led foreign troops.

"We demand the occupation forces to leave the country, or at least a timetable should be set for their withdrawal," al-Sadr said during a sermon.

Despite al-Maliki's efforts, there has been no letup in Iraq's violence. The U.S. military reported four more American service members have died, including a Marine killed Friday in fighting west of Baghdad. Three Army soldiers died in combat the day before, the military said.

___

AP correspondent Ryan Lenz is embedded with the 101st Airborne Division in Beiji, Iraq. He was previously embedded with the 502nd Infantry Regiment in Mahmoudiya. AP correspondent Lolita C. Baldor in Washington contributed to this report.

0 likes

Pontiac 68?

0 likes

Nah, he's in SoCal.

0 likes

:ignore:

0 likes

Hope I didn't offend, 68.... Just a bit tasteless humor that, what with the seriousness of the charges.

0 likes

This stuff just keeps rolling on and on, and getting worse and worse.

No smoke without fire.:(

0 likes

No insult made.

Haven't heard of this. I really don't know what to say. I hope the allegations are wrong. If not, and it looks, by the article, that they are guilty, this sure isn't helping our cause. I have absolutely no explanation for this.

If they are guilty, i say they get strung up, tortured and burned.

JHC

0 likes

Well as long as they get done for it this is a good thing surely, it's them doing this and getting away with it that's concerning.

Well not withstanding it would be better for them not to do it again.

0 likes

68Pontiac wrote:

If they are guilty, i say they get strung up, tortured and burned.

JHC

Is this typical punishment given to/meted out by the armed forces? It might explain why all these problems and allegations keep appearing, especially if the 'string em up' attitude is taken into conflict.

0 likes

Burt Reynolds wrote:

68Pontiac wrote:

If they are guilty, i say they get strung up, tortured and burned.

JHC

Is this typical punishment given to/meted out by the armed forces? It might explain why all these problems and allegations keep appearing, especially if the 'string em up' attitude is taken into conflict.

No, they would go to a military prison, which is more regimented than a civilian prison. Rank structure still exists, and they go about breaking rocks and such. The only benefit to being in a military prison, is that since it is more regimented, you don't have any raping or stabbings in the prison.

JHC

0 likes

68Pontiac wrote:

Burt Reynolds wrote:

68Pontiac wrote:

If they are guilty, i say they get strung up, tortured and burned.

JHC

Is this typical punishment given to/meted out by the armed forces? It might explain why all these problems and allegations keep appearing, especially if the 'string em up' attitude is taken into conflict.

No, they would go to a military prison, which is more regimented than a civilian prison. Rank structure still exists, and they go about breaking rocks and such. The only benefit to being in a military prison, is that since it is more regimented, you don't have any raping or stabbings in the prison.

JHC

oooh NOO!.. A Military prison. How awful. Poor buggers.:evil4:

Hey!, Guantanamo is gonna be out of use shortly. Could put all the sensory deprivation equipment to good use. Wire them up by the testicles perhaps.

0 likes

AND... I think you missed my point, Pontiac.

Once again.:crazy:

0 likes

well we can I say, the immorality stems from the jackass himself, Bush. Leading a war on false pretenses(let's drop the false intelligence...lies!!!!) , and torturing prisoners gave rise to cancer and it spread to the regular officers on the ground.It was bound to happen.

0 likes

68Pontiac wrote: No insult made.

Haven't heard of this. I really don't know what to say. I hope the allegations are wrong. If not, and it looks, by the article, that they are guilty, this sure isn't helping our cause. I have absolutely no explanation for this.

If they are guilty, i say they get strung up, tortured and burned.

JHC

Er, I thought the key rationale for the U.S. invasion was to STOP people getting "strung up, tortured and burned"?

Go, Western Democracy!!!

0 likes

I would like to point out that nobody was hung, tortured, raped or burned in the taking of this photograph.

That salute is for you, Mike!

0 likes

afterall, these stories are the bright side of war for soldiers... it is so common since the birth of humanity...

(I must have woken on the wrong side of bed today)

0 likes

My kneejerk reaction is these things happen in war, and the more futile and unjustified the war the more likely they are to happen. Its partly because these things always happen in wars that politicians should be damn careful about starting them without good reason.

To what extent the soldiers who perpetuate such horrors should be personally punished I have no idea, not having ever been in the situation they were in, I'd leave it to those who have experience of being in their shoes to decide their fate. But in a just world Blair and Bush would be prosecuted. Blair should certainly be facing trial, given his blatant lies and the disaster they led to.

0 likes

404 error wrote: My kneejerk reaction is these things happen in war, and the more futile and unjustified the war the more likely they are to happen. Its partly because these things always happen in wars that politicians should be damn careful about starting them without good reason.

To what extent the soldiers who perpetuate such horrors should be personally punished I have no idea, not having ever been in the situation they were in, I'd leave it to those who have experience of being in their shoes to decide their fate. But in a just world Blair and Bush would be prosecuted. Blair should certainly be facing trial, given his blatant lies and the disaster they led to.

very well said.

99% of soldiers are just earning a crust, doing a job. Obv this is a bit extreme but in general who are we to have a pop at them?

Imagine the army going on strike for better pay?

0 likes

well said gentlemen

0 likes

You're leaving NewOrderOnline

This link goes to an external website we don't operate, which has its own privacy policy and terms.

Destination:
Continue ↗