27 replies · 583 views
Bless; poor guy nearly killed himself today. I really hope he recovers and finds himself, and stops getting raped in prison, and repents all sins .............don't you? It must be so terrible for him.
Two names - Holly & Jessica.
Shame he didn't succeed.
Wino wrote: Bless; poor guy nearly killed himself today. I really hope he recovers and finds himself, and stops getting raped in prison, and repents all sins .............don't you? It must be so terrible for him.
Two names - Holly & Jessica.
Shame he didn't succeed.
Not at all. I want him to go through the hell of prison for the rest of his natural life. Death is too good for him, too easy.
They should let him out though surely?
Into a playground of Women waiting for their kids to come out of school!
He's one of those people that will never be released, like Ian Brady.
Just make the c___ suffer in his cell for 40 years, and if, like Brady, he refuses to eat, then force-feed him. Don't let him take the easy option like Hermann Goering, Fred West and Harold Shipman.
People like him are actually credible admissions to Guantanamo.
No; I know where you are coming from but.......let the ****ard die. Why keep him? Rid this mortal coil and all that. Worthless piece of SH1t.
What is it they say to keep a prisoner behind bars? £600 a week? Sod that. Of course, on suicide watch, he retains the services of 'specialists'; what a load of old ........
If he want's to die, let him. Close the door and kiss goodbye.
What a dark place he must live in.
I cringe when I think of the things I've done.
Wonder how he feels...
It's the first i've heard about this.
How did he attempt to do it? Overdose, hanging..?
People like Huntley should be closely monitored for the entire length of their sentence for suicide attempts, they don't deserve an easy way out, they should be made to live with their crimes. No doubt he'll find God at some point too.
Wino wrote:
If he want's to die, let him.
Unfortunately this would be granting his wishes. Perhaps the nightmares are driving him crazy. Let them continue to do so.
His Holiness, The Pope wrote: He's only killed a few people. You Brits need to get some proper serial killers.
We have plenty.. Dennis Nielson, Peter Sutcliffe, Fred West to name just a few.
Ian Huntley has a particular resonance, because of the way the media descended almost 24/7 on the little town of Soham, and how, for two weeks, we all believed these girls were alive. Various live interviews with him and his girlfriend, saying how shocked they were at their disappearance, will live long in the memory of the people that watch Sky News. The fact that thier killer was a 'regular' on TV made it all the more shocking.
Burt Reynolds wrote:
His Holiness, The Pope wrote: He's only killed a few people. You Brits need to get some proper serial killers.
We have plenty.. Dennis Nielson, Peter Sutcliffe, Fred West to name just a few.
Ian Huntley has a particular resonance, because of the way the media descended almost 24/7 on the little town of Soham, and how, for two weeks, we all believed these girls were alive. Various live interviews with him and his girlfriend, saying how shocked they were at their disappearance, will live long in the memory of the people that watch Sky News. The fact that thier killer was a 'regular' on TV made it all the more shocking.
What do you mean by he was a regular on TV? Did he have a show or something?
D'oh! wrote: [qWhat do you mean by he was a regular on TV? Did he have a show or something?
No, he was in the news all the time.
D'oh! wrote:
Burt Reynolds wrote:
His Holiness, The Pope wrote: He's only killed a few people. You Brits need to get some proper serial killers.
We have plenty.. Dennis Nielson, Peter Sutcliffe, Fred West to name just a few.
Ian Huntley has a particular resonance, because of the way the media descended almost 24/7 on the little town of Soham, and how, for two weeks, we all believed these girls were alive. Various live interviews with him and his girlfriend, saying how shocked they were at their disappearance, will live long in the memory of the people that watch Sky News. The fact that thier killer was a 'regular' on TV made it all the more shocking.
What do you mean by he was a regular on TV? Did he have a show or something?
He did numerous interviews, for the two weeks prior to being discovered. His wife, who was in on it, was their teacher. She was on TV, holding up notes from the girls, saying how sweet they were, looking tearful.
In terms of TV coverage, it was pretty much 24/7 for best part of a month. Nation was gripped in finding out what had happened to the girls, in the thin hope they were still alive. What hit the UK so hard, were that two of the interviewees people had got used to, were the perpetrators.
I say keep him alive, cunt deserves everything he gets. Agree with Col ( again, making a habit of this), I lose sleep of things I've done, none of which are even in the same space time continuum as bumping off two wee girls. Then again, someone as fucked as that.....do they feel at all?
Doctor? wrote: I say keep him alive, cunt deserves everything he gets. Agree with Col ( again, making a habit of this), I lose sleep of things I've done, none of which are even in the same space time continuum as bumping off two wee girls. Then again, someone as fucked as that.....do they feel at all?
Two suicide attempts says he does, I reckon. So deny him what he wants. Forty years of dreaming that stuff would be hell on earth.
He's only killed a few people. You Brits need to get some proper serial killers.
Yah, now Ted Bundy was sheer class 
I do subscribe to both points of view (let him wallow, let him die) but guess I need to get off the fence.
I'd go for this voluntary euthanasia thing for 'proper' lifers. It does rankle with me that some of my taxes go towards keeping the likes of these people alive while the NHS will often tell cancer sufferers and the like that there is nothing more they can do for them. The subtext very often is that it makes no financial sense to carry on. Just think on how many more courses of drugs/therapies could be funded by the money saved in this way
On a slight tangent. My dog is soft as shite but would kill any other dog which threatens my children given half the chance. He could get the doggie death penalty for that. It doesn't make sense
I hereby withdraw my taxes. Why the fook should we continue to pay to keep that bastard alive? There's gonna be an inquiry now into how he got to hoard the pills and how he was left unsupervised long enough to OD, wouldn't it do the whole world a favour if they'd just let him croak it?
I was thinking about this on the way home last night. While I am reticent about supporting the death penalty (though DNA evidence can help), shouldn't there be the option in certain circumstances (like child murder, serial murder etc) for the convicted killer to request his own death? It will certainly save the taxpayer money and rid the country of some scum.
Let him live,50 years in prison with people spitting at him,and raping him. I despise people like this,some say its an illness-i dont belive that.
Tax wise I think we're still paying for Venables & Thompsons's anonymity aren't we? Stick them in a cell with Huntley.
Most people thought they couldn't feel any less sympathetic for him during his trial, then amazed themselves by managing to do just that following his ridiculous defence argument. For those who don't know, he claimed that these two fit young girls just simultaneously fell into a bath of water, banged their heads, drowned and there was nothing he could do about it. All he wanted to plead guilty to was concealing their bodies for a bit. He conforms to most people's definition of evil; with a well-known face like his, he'll probably be treated like a monster by everyone he ever meets.
Tim's point is exactly right - we're paying a lot of money to keep this man in a constant state of terrible despair with no possible chance of rehabilitation or release. This man will never do anything for the community. And think about the impact on the family of those girls each time his name comes into the news: it can’t be helping them, can it?
What is the purpose of prison for Huntley? If it's punishment, where do we stop? Would a daily flogging torture this man any more? Is it to act as a deterrent to others? Would Huntley’s plight serve to deter anyone else from committing similar crimes? Somehow I think not. Anyone in a dark enough place to contemplate such terrible things is unlikely to give prison a moments thought. Following his crime Huntley knew he would be in serious trouble and this surely drove him in his desperation to hide what he’d done.
All that’s left is the fact that a country has a duty of care to all citizens, no matter how badly they’ve behaved. In this instance I think that duty would best be served by ending his sorry life.
PHD wrote: Tax wise I think we're still paying for Venables & Thompsons's anonymity aren't we? Stick them in a cell with Huntley.
That was horrible,probably the worst murder i can remember.
D'oh! wrote:
What do you mean by he was a regular on TV? Did he have a show or something?
I've just spat my tea over my computer, thanks a lot 
There was a similar case just two weeks ago, where a four year old boy was taken and beaten round the head with a brick. Thankfully he's alright.
This country is grim.
Missy Jem wrote: There was a similar case just two weeks ago, where a four year old boy was taken and beaten round the head with a brick. Thankfully he's alright.
This country is grim.
Aye and fuck all will happen to the little twat that did it.
