[darkgreen]Green[/darkgreen] wrote:
Nice insight into LaRussa Tabsy, can't argue against that. IF the Cards make it into the WS and lose, I'll just here some more BS talk about them losing to a "team of destiny" once again, I've despised the Cardinals for at least the last twenty years, their complete meltdown because of one bad call in 1985 (Denkinger's miscall would've only been the FIRST out of the inning; suck it up and get on with the task at hand, you losers) still has me shaking my head.
As long as the Mets pitching staff, held together presently by band-aids, duct tape, and prayer, doesn't completely unravel, I still like their chances to advance to the Series.
Demerit points to A. Pujols for his ill-advised comments about Tom Glavine after Game 1 and not being "impressed at all" by his stuff: He made your team look silly, so what the hell are you talking about? What a goober. 
Don't get me wrong, there are some managers who deserve to be singled out for their skills at maintaining a contending team and holding it together (even if they have only one or zero champioships to their name). Case in point: local boy Bobby Cox (well, GA is one state over). Sure, the Braves haven't won the big game since '95, but up until this past year they've always contended for the spot and walked away with the NL East title. There's something to be said for persistance in the face of constant disappointment. 
But to elevate LaRussa as "the saviour of basic fundamental baseball" when the guy had two known dopers on his A's team (and one with the Cards) and he starts to lose his luster. I'm not saying LaRussa is a bad manager, or even not good at times. But he's more often wrong than right (borne out by the Series against the BoSox two years ago), and the madness just has to stop. If the Cards fold, and I think they will (but predictions about baseball can be about as accurate as ones about when the world will end), I think they need to seriously reconsider whether LaRussa is really worth it. 