Bush in Texas to rethink Iraq course

You mean....if you put a million dubya's in a million white houses, they'd eventually come up with a foreign policy that doesn't look like they're sketching out the role of "Ultimate Evil Overloard" in some el-cheapo sci fi show.

Can some foreign leader please express a desire to try Bush for war crimes? Iran's president is nutty enough to do so. It would make me laugh.

Guardian cartoonist Steve Bell

Young woman: When is a joke not a joke? Young man: When it's told to an Englishman.

Thanks, that was an actual joke copyright 1896.

My questions to an IQ Society, there are a lot of these "clubs", but I wanted to know :

Why is it that some of the same persons are running different societies,all asking for money, and that in itself suspicious to me? I mean, if the lizards are going to take over why the hell have societies to make all of you feel special and have someone to relate to when it certainly isn't going to save your ass,balls, or face let alone your intelligence? We're at war here goddam it. Make yourself useful and build a defense system you whores. Thank you for your time.

I don't know if that makes sense. Jap face wouldn't quit yapping over me long enough for me to get my thoughts out into correct alignment on the screen.Oh,well/.////.,;,.;.,

before you re-do something, don't you have to DO it in the first place?

Re-thinking implies original thought.

C'mon, after 4 years... isn't now the time to put some thought into the "plan" for Iraq? Now Bush has about 4 years of experience of dealing with Iraq and can now start thinking about a plan for what the USA is doing in Iraq.

...but all these same questions about Iraq were asked by many 4 years ago, 3 years ago, 2 years ago, 1 year ago... and Bush arrogantly ignored these discussions. I know a girl whose brother was killed in October, she has been devastated... will her brother have died for a reason?

Spotnick wrote:

Doctor? wrote: before you re-do something, don't you have to DO it in the first place?

Re-thinking implies original thought.

Well, they had all those precious documents they have show to the UN saying there were WMD over there... ;)

oh yes, those ones. Well, while they are still invisible documents that only smart people like shrub can see (like the weapons), he's crossing out "iraq!" and writing "Iran" in in crayon ( or getting someone who can read and write to do it for him anyway).

If the sole premise of the war was WoMaD's (the CIA will confirm no Al-Q activity in Iraq prior to the US invasion), then surely the relatives of the dead on both sides, have a fairly strong case against the US Govt for unprovoked aggression, since said weapons are now demonstrably fictional.

I ran into a Dalek the other day, and we got talking, and you know what it said to me...."that Bush, he's a right cunt him"

Spotnick wrote:

Doctor? wrote: before you re-do something, don't you have to DO it in the first place?

Re-thinking implies original thought.

Well, they had all those precious documents they have show to the UN saying there were WMD over there... ;)

Actually, that's a great point Spotty. UN Resolution after UN Resolution after UN Resolution are filled with accounts of Iraqi stockpiles of WMD that cannot be accounted for.

*Kim Jong-il in Team America * "Hans Brix?? Oh no!"

Doctor? wrote:

Spotnick wrote:

Doctor? wrote: before you re-do something, don't you have to DO it in the first place?

Re-thinking implies original thought.

Well, they had all those precious documents they have show to the UN saying there were WMD over there... ;)

oh yes, those ones. Well, while they are still invisible documents that only smart people like shrub can see (like the weapons), he's crossing out "iraq!" and writing "Iran" in in crayon ( or getting someone who can read and write to do it for him anyway).

If the sole premise of the war was WoMaD's (the CIA will confirm no Al-Q activity in Iraq prior to the US invasion), then surely the relatives of the dead on both sides, have a fairly strong case against the US Govt for unprovoked aggression, since said weapons are now demonstrably fictional.

I ran into a Dalek the other day, and we got talking, and you know what it said to me...."that Bush, he's a right cunt him"

On the:

WMDs: There have been many found, but they are dated around the Iran/Iraq war. Some are still usable, while others shelf life has expired. So to say that "none have been found" is a misnomer.

Al-Q: While there was no activity at the time, I think (and this is purely speculation), that they were looking at Saddam's history with accepting peoples kicked out of a country after being considered 'terrorists'. Kuwait, back in the early 90s, kicked out ALL the Palastinians after multiple terrorist attacks caused by Palastinian groups. Saddam allowed ALL Palastinians to enter his country, with no real backround check. I think, that there might have been a concern that after the attack on Afganastan, Saddam would do the same with Al-Q......but again this is purely speculation.

Saddam had his own WMD's?

Or did he just have all of the old US ones lying around.

BTW, a mustard gas shell is not a WMD.

So..the US has found the full Nuke program it killed all those kids to find, well I#m glad of that, now if you would just SHOWS them to us.

The definition of a WMD is:

Any weapon or device that is intended, or has the capability, to cause death or serious bodily injury to a significant number of people through the release, dissemination, or impact of toxic or poisonous chemicals or their precursors, a disease organism, or radiation or radioactivity.

So mustard gas does fall in this catagory. The mustard gas was mostly expired but there was also sarin gas was the main still usable, with a few others in the minority.

Also there wasn't any talk of nukes in Iraq, as far as I remember.....it was the chemical and biological weapons that the WMD was refered to at the begining of the war.

Where does depleted uranium ammunition fall?

god tamer wrote: Where does depleted uranium ammunition fall?

Usually from an A-10 Warthog.

My favourite US plane without a doubt.

I will NEVER forget the BBC report from the Gulf part one ( the one where we were probably the good guys)....."some ten miles away the American A10 Thunderbolts were working over the Iraqi armour", the voice stops, and even over the engines of the local vehicles you can hear "ggggrrrrrrrrp ggggrrrrrrrrrrrp", such an incredible sound, I've seen closer footage of them in action, but like a good bassline, that noise needs MILES to develop properly.

Yet another example of the liberal media taking something that Bush is doing and running around with the wrong end in its grip...

Because Bush is in Texas to rethink the golf course he wants to put in the place of Saddam's old palace.

C'mon, "fair and balanced", get it right for once! Fore! :p

Taboo # 7 wrote: Yet another example of the liberal media taking something that Bush is doing and running around with the wrong end in its grip...

Because Bush is in Texas to rethink the golf course he wants to put in the place of Saddam's old palace.

C'mon, "fair and balanced", get it right for once! Fore! :p

Thought the course was already in place:

http://www.theleafchronicle.com/news/stories/20040411/themission/204061.html

Jeffari-al-Texani wrote: I suppose wherever it lands...

On innocents, agent orange for our generation. WMD a matter of distinction.

Except.....

Agent orange involves taking things out of nature and processing them to be MORE dangerous as a defoliation chemical. BUT, we take uranium from nature, REDUCE it's radioactivity levels, and let it go again...it's cleaning up is all. Humans need to get a grip about radiation......guess what that noise coming from NO's sound system is.....yup it's "radiation" quick everyone make shrieking noises and run around in panic.

FACT: without ionizing radiation, you would not be here. Fact, the sun (which is a happy smiley thing) produces millions of times more radiation, every second than would be released by all our bombs "which are bad things".

Don't mind me BTW, I am just in one of my "everyone's full of it about absolutely everything" moods....I'm pretty sure I could convincingly argue against gravity while falling from a tall building.

Jeffari-al-Texani wrote: Oh wait...can chimps think at all???

Yes, they can.

Thereby effectively refuting the premnise that W is a chimp.