Faith groups protest against gay rights bill

Comrade Shampanyov wrote:

EdelBrock wrote: Alas I can't get youtube at work......it's not a vid of me wanking off is it?

No, that one is live streaming....

y'all are so fucked up in the head, I love it!

Minx wrote: Just because you don't come across prejudice in your life doesn't mean it doesn't exist...

Well my arsehole definately has prejudices......things only come out of it, nothing goes in.....so should I stop giving service to it?

Spotnick wrote: Well, I live in Canada, I can marry however I want, man or woman, over 18, anytime... no need for love! Well actually I can't, polygamy is illegal ;-)

You can now do fake gay weddings, just like there were in the past for man and woman that marry because of their parents companies and stuff like that.

It will bring a new breed of Gold diggers ;-)

But well, it's life... they have the right to have the same things as the other.. the only thing that bugs me is adoption... I know the argument that there are very bad families around, many children are raised with only one parent... but I wouldn't want to be the one who goes through high-school telling everybody he has 2 dads... I believe that could be very damagable...

Agreed. Rosie Odonnel was on her shows complaining about how her adopted son doesn't seem to be acting normal, and blamed it on him, but if you heard all the crap she was discussing on national tv, it was like.....

maybe its because there's no dad and two moms (or is one the dad? )

EdelBrock wrote:

Spotnick wrote: Well, I live in Canada, I can marry however I want, man or woman, over 18, anytime... no need for love! Well actually I can't, polygamy is illegal ;-)

You can now do fake gay weddings, just like there were in the past for man and woman that marry because of their parents companies and stuff like that.

It will bring a new breed of Gold diggers ;-)

But well, it's life... they have the right to have the same things as the other.. the only thing that bugs me is adoption... I know the argument that there are very bad families around, many children are raised with only one parent... but I wouldn't want to be the one who goes through high-school telling everybody he has 2 dads... I believe that could be very damagable...

Agreed. Rosie Odonnel was on her shows complaining about how her adopted son doesn't seem to be acting normal, and blamed it on him, but if you heard all the crap she was discussing on national tv, it was like.....

maybe its because there's no dad and two moms (or is one the dad? )

JesusfuckingChrist. And you live in California?????

Doctor Clayhead wrote:

JesusfuckingChrist. And you live in California?????

What the hell has that got to do with anything?

I'm in Southern CA, not middle like ol' popey (he's smack dab in gay-lover-land)

EdelBrock wrote:

Spotnick wrote: Well, I live in Canada, I can marry however I want, man or woman, over 18, anytime... no need for love! Well actually I can't, polygamy is illegal ;-)

You can now do fake gay weddings, just like there were in the past for man and woman that marry because of their parents companies and stuff like that.

It will bring a new breed of Gold diggers ;-)

But well, it's life... they have the right to have the same things as the other.. the only thing that bugs me is adoption... I know the argument that there are very bad families around, many children are raised with only one parent... but I wouldn't want to be the one who goes through high-school telling everybody he has 2 dads... I believe that could be very damagable...

Agreed. Rosie Odonnel was on her shows complaining about how her adopted son doesn't seem to be acting normal, and blamed it on him, but if you heard all the crap she was discussing on national tv, it was like.....

maybe its because there's no dad and two moms (or is one the dad? )

must be cos she's a Dyke then....nothinh to do with her being an asshole?

EdelBrock wrote:

Doctor Clayhead wrote:

JesusfuckingChrist. And you live in California?????

What the hell has that got to do with anything?

I'm in Southern CA, not middle like ol' popey (he's smack dab in gay-lover-land)

SoCal is just as liberal as NorCal, until you get to San Diego. It's all the military bases that skew things. Even with the military presence, San Diego, is just barely a Republican town.

And San Francisco has a large gay population because it's a tolerant city. When gay people get tired of the gay-bashing in their shitty little All-American hometowns, they leave for New York, San Francisco, and other cosmopolitan meccas, where they can just live their lives in peace...

I suppose God had nothing to with homosexual animals either, or those Satanic asexually reproducing plants!

I suppose God also told the Pope that condoms should be banned in Africa as well so that the whole continent can die of HIV!

:DOH!:

Whenever Rosie opens her mouth, I go into ignore mode. She has nothing important to say.

Craig W wrote: I suppose God had nothing to with homosexual animals either, or those Satanic asexually reproducing plants!

I suppose God also told the Pope that condoms should be banned in Africa as well so that the whole continent can die of HIV!

:DOH!:

I always rely on contraceptive advice from a man who claims to be celebate(and has probably impregnated 1000 nuns).Then again all popes used to be cardinals who used to be priests, so he's probably followed God's path to avoiding sex with women....raping young boys. Christians, loathe them or ignore them, you can't like them.

Comrade Shampanyov wrote: SoCal is just as liberal as NorCal, until you get to San Diego. It's all the military bases that skew things. Even with the military presence, San Diego, is just barely a Republican town.

Actually most of So Cal is borderline on either side. LA tends to be highly liberal due to its high proportion of hispanics. San Diego used to be comfortably conservative, but there are more and more peole moving from other areas into San Diego which has made as you mentioned, barely conservative. Riverside and san bernidino are about the same way. Orange county is just a mess. All in all, though, So Cal is as conservative as it gets in Cali (though I am not too well versed in real northern Ca, I mean who really cares about what Redding thinks? )

And San Francisco has a large gay population because it's a tolerant city. where they can just live their lives in peace...

Or more correctly, where they can get a piece

Doctor Clayhead wrote:

EdelBrock wrote:

Spotnick wrote: Well, I live in Canada, I can marry however I want, man or woman, over 18, anytime... no need for love! Well actually I can't, polygamy is illegal ;-)

You can now do fake gay weddings, just like there were in the past for man and woman that marry because of their parents companies and stuff like that.

It will bring a new breed of Gold diggers ;-)

But well, it's life... they have the right to have the same things as the other.. the only thing that bugs me is adoption... I know the argument that there are very bad families around, many children are raised with only one parent... but I wouldn't want to be the one who goes through high-school telling everybody he has 2 dads... I believe that could be very damagable...

Agreed. Rosie Odonnel was on her shows complaining about how her adopted son doesn't seem to be acting normal, and blamed it on him, but if you heard all the crap she was discussing on national tv, it was like.....

maybe its because there's no dad and two moms (or is one the dad? )

JesusfuckingChrist. And you live in California?????

Rosie O'Donnell is a shite mom. Not because she's a d*ke but because she's an awful human being and just a fucking pig! Being gay is probably the only thing she has going for her as a parent, because maybe it'll show her kids to overcome the adversity of having such a crap mother

EdelBrock wrote:

Comrade Shampanyov wrote: SoCal is just as liberal as NorCal, until you get to San Diego. It's all the military bases that skew things. Even with the military presence, San Diego, is just barely a Republican town.

Actually most of So Cal is borderline on either side. LA tends to be highly liberal due to its high proportion of hispanics. San Diego used to be comfortably conservative, but there are more and more peole moving from other areas into San Diego which has made as you mentioned, barely conservative. Riverside and san bernidino are about the same way. Orange county is just a mess. All in all, though, So Cal is as conservative as it gets in Cali (though I am not too well versed in real northern Ca, I mean who really cares about what Redding thinks? )

And San Francisco has a large gay population because it's a tolerant city. where they can just live their lives in peace...

Or more correctly, where they can get a piece

Hispanics are not all liberal, especially in LA. Also, San Francisco is only tolerant of people who think a certain way.

EdelBrock wrote:

Comrade Shampanyov wrote: SoCal is just as liberal as NorCal, until you get to San Diego. It's all the military bases that skew things. Even with the military presence, San Diego, is just barely a Republican town.

Actually most of So Cal is borderline on either side. LA tends to be highly liberal due to its high proportion of hispanics. San Diego used to be comfortably conservative, but there are more and more peole moving from other areas into San Diego which has made as you mentioned, barely conservative. Riverside and san bernidino are about the same way. Orange county is just a mess. All in all, though, So Cal is as conservative as it gets in Cali (though I am not too well versed in real northern Ca, I mean who really cares about what Redding thinks? )

True, Orange County was always the conservative balance to L.A.. although L.A. prolly outweighs O.C. population-wise.

But the coastal cities are the state's real population centers, and San Diego excepted, they are the west coast bastions of the liberal archipelago. It's not until you go inland, into the central valley, that you start finding solidly conservative communities (Redding included, prolly).

Chrissy says, 'RELAX'! wrote: Hispanics are not all liberal, especially in LA. Also, San Francisco is only tolerant of people who think a certain way.

San Francisco tends to have a low tolerance level for intolerance, if that's what you mean. Anti-gay and/or racist hate mongers would be well advised not to hold their rallies in San Francisco.

It depends on which San Franciscans you're talking about, though. The City's blue collar population is fairly conservative, although that may be relative to the rest of San Francisco, rather than to the country. Frank Jordan was a conservative San Francisco mayor, but almost anywhere else in America, he'd be a liberal.

Chrissy says, 'RELAX'! wrote: Hispanics are not all liberal, especially in LA. Also, San Francisco is only tolerant of people who think a certain way.

Where did you get your info on L.A.? Hispanics tend to be liberal on the voting stance, and is the main reason L.A> is liberal. Now in thier day to day life, I think they act more conservative.

Probably right on San Fran, but I've never lived there, so couldn't say for sure.

Er, first, in California, they're not "Hispanics," they're "Latinos."

As far as politics go, they are prolly in general socially conservative but economically liberal.

Comrade Shampanyov wrote: Er, first, in California, they're not "Hispanics," they're "Latinos."

As far as politics go, they are prolly in general socially conservative but economically liberal.

Latinos are only if they are an American citizen, illegals are considered Hispanic.

EdelBrock wrote:

Comrade Shampanyov wrote: Er, first, in California, they're not "Hispanics," they're "Latinos."

As far as politics go, they are prolly in general socially conservative but economically liberal.

Latinos are only if they are an American citizen, illegals are considered Hispanic.

I'm referring to what La Raza calls itself in California. They don't call themselves "Hispanic." They call themselves "Latino."

Well, that's one way to kill a thread, change the discussion to something no one gives a rat's ass about (and I'm partly at fault at that too)

Doctor? wrote:

EdelBrock wrote:

Spotnick wrote: Well, I live in Canada, I can marry however I want, man or woman, over 18, anytime... no need for love! Well actually I can't, polygamy is illegal ;-)

You can now do fake gay weddings, just like there were in the past for man and woman that marry because of their parents companies and stuff like that.

It will bring a new breed of Gold diggers ;-)

But well, it's life... they have the right to have the same things as the other.. the only thing that bugs me is adoption... I know the argument that there are very bad families around, many children are raised with only one parent... but I wouldn't want to be the one who goes through high-school telling everybody he has 2 dads... I believe that could be very damagable...

Agreed. Rosie Odonnel was on her shows complaining about how her adopted son doesn't seem to be acting normal, and blamed it on him, but if you heard all the crap she was discussing on national tv, it was like.....

maybe its because there's no dad and two moms (or is one the dad? )

must be cos she's a Dyke then....nothinh to do with her being an asshole?

It has nothing to do with being a dyke. Any kid who has Rosie O'Donnell for a mother is probably not going to turn out normal. Ever since she stopped her talk show about five years ago, she just seems to try to take the spotlight as a pseudo-gay rights activist and it's kind of annoying, because she really doesn't do anything.

Going back to the original topic, although I don't know how much of a separation of church and state your government has, religious groups should not have any influence in it. Over on this side of the pond, right-wing religious nuts already seem to have too much influence. If they can't deal with homosexuals having the same rights they do, well, they should just hole themselves up in a cave and stay there so the rest of us don't have to listen to them.

This blue-eyed boy that wants to be wrote: If they can't deal with homosexuals having the same rights they do, well, they should just hole themselves up in a cave and stay there so the rest of us don't have to listen to them.

Well, can't gays do the same thing? ....the holing up in the cave deal?

EdelBrock wrote:

This blue-eyed boy that wants to be wrote: If they can't deal with homosexuals having the same rights they do, well, they should just hole themselves up in a cave and stay there so the rest of us don't have to listen to them.

Well, can't gays do the same thing? ....the holing up in the cave deal?

Lets' see... There's some group that can't live in peace with their neighbors, so the obvious solution is for their neighbors to go hole up in a cave somewhere. Yeah, that makes sense...

EdelBrock wrote:

This blue-eyed boy that wants to be wrote: If they can't deal with homosexuals having the same rights they do, well, they should just hole themselves up in a cave and stay there so the rest of us don't have to listen to them.

Well, can't gays do the same thing? ....the holing up in the cave deal?

Back to the pre-Stonewall days? Sounds great!

Comrade Shampanyov wrote:

EdelBrock wrote:

This blue-eyed boy that wants to be wrote: If they can't deal with homosexuals having the same rights they do, well, they should just hole themselves up in a cave and stay there so the rest of us don't have to listen to them.

Well, can't gays do the same thing? ....the holing up in the cave deal?

Lets' see... There's some group that can't live in peace with their neighbors, so the obvious solution is for their neighbors to go hole up in a cave somewhere. Yeah, that makes sense...

I'm only pointing out that Blueboy's comments make as much sense......

EdelBrock wrote:

Comrade Shampanyov wrote:

EdelBrock wrote:

This blue-eyed boy that wants to be wrote: If they can't deal with homosexuals having the same rights they do, well, they should just hole themselves up in a cave and stay there so the rest of us don't have to listen to them.

Well, can't gays do the same thing? ....the holing up in the cave deal?

Lets' see... There's some group that can't live in peace with their neighbors, so the obvious solution is for their neighbors to go hole up in a cave somewhere. Yeah, that makes sense...

I'm only pointing out that Blueboy's comments make as much sense......

But my point is they're not the same thing...

Comrade Shampanyov wrote:

EdelBrock wrote:

Comrade Shampanyov wrote:

EdelBrock wrote:

This blue-eyed boy that wants to be wrote: If they can't deal with homosexuals having the same rights they do, well, they should just hole themselves up in a cave and stay there so the rest of us don't have to listen to them.

Well, can't gays do the same thing? ....the holing up in the cave deal?

Lets' see... There's some group that can't live in peace with their neighbors, so the obvious solution is for their neighbors to go hole up in a cave somewhere. Yeah, that makes sense...

I'm only pointing out that Blueboy's comments make as much sense......

But my point is they're not the same thing...

Well if we want to get technical, one takes it in the bumm, the other listens with their bumm.....

Oh dear....

Sending the victim of persecution off to live in a cave and sending the persecutor off to live in a cave aren't equally sensible suggestions...

How about firebombing both, or just one of them? Is that ok?