Doctor? wrote:
It sticks in my throat, but XP actually is solid (painfully slow, but nevertheless, solid), I'd say my linux machine only outlasts it about 2 to 1, as opposed to about 30 to 1 with 98SE
Vista just seems like Xp, plus a pile of (very pretty) bloat, and DRM gone mad.
If I could change just ONE thing about windows, it would be that it would not stick the desktop up half an hour before it's in any way willing to let you interact with it. Either load all the taskbar shite first, THEN show the desktop, or stick the desktop up, and BACKGROUND the loading of the 800 flummies that live in the sys tray. In a way it's a testament to Xp that I LEAVE anything in autorun, on 98 I had to kill everything except drivers to get something resembling a stable OS.
As ever I will be dragged kicking and screaming onto vista about 4 years (and a couple of new PC's) from now.
That's the compromise they did when people were thinking it was too slow.. not it looks like it's booting faster, but in reality, it's not.
Though I believe Bill's dream is now a Windows that is automatic when you press on.
Well, Vista will be a good OS, but people will apply the "why fix it if it ain't broken" rule... today, Moore's law is no longer true, people don't need to upgrade their computer, and who the hell cares if their os is better... they will mostly upgrade when they won't have the choice...
Otherwise, it's not really needed... I found a lof of annoyments in it, enough to make me reinstall XP, and the DRM is indeed gone mad, so is the security thing... I mean, it pops up a window to stop you every 5 mins from doing the stuff you are doing... it gets very annoying...
Secure, maybe, but at which cost?
We'll see.... time will tell!
Linux will never get serious until they merge all the various versions into one big legit one... just like Firefox, do one group and work on it.